Knowledge of Quantum Hidden Variables Enables Backwards-In-Time Signaling
Source abstract
Abstract
Bell’s theorem implies that any completion of quantum mechanics which uses hidden variables (that is, preexisting values of all observables) must be nonlocal in the Einstein sense. This customarily indicates that knowledge of the hidden variables would permit superluminal communication. Such superluminal signaling, akin to the existence of a preferred reference frame, is to be expected. However, here we provide a protocol that allows an observer with knowledge of the hidden variables to communicate with her own causal past, without superluminal signaling. That is, such knowledge would contradict causality, irrespectively of the validity of relativity theory. Among the ways we propose for bypassing the paradox there is the possibility of hidden variables that change their values even when the state does not, and that means that signaling backwards in time is prohibited in Bohmian mechanics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Quantum Information Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba 8410501, Israel
Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel
Dip. Fisica and INFN Sez. Pavia, University of Pavia, via Bassi 6, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
Theoretical Physics Division, Rudjer Bošković Institute, P.O.B. 180, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia
Funding
Foundational Questions Institute
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses10.1016/j.physrep.2005.03.003 ↗
2. Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell10.1103/RevModPhys.65.803 ↗
3. Belinfante, F.J. (1973). A Survey of Hidden-Variables Theories, Pergamon Press.
4. An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations of Gravitation10.1103/RevModPhys.21.447 ↗
5. The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics
6. Incompatible results of quantum measurements10.1016/0375-9601(90)90172-K ↗
7. On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics10.1103/RevModPhys.38.447 ↗
8. Colloquium: Bell’s theorem and locally mediated reformulations of quantum mechanics10.1103/RevModPhys.92.021002 ↗
9. Bell nonlocality10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419 ↗
10. Werner, R.F. (2001). Quantum information theory—An invitation. Quantum Information—An Introduction to Basic Theoretical Concepts and Experiments, Springer. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics.10.1007/3-540-44678-8_2 ↗
11. Faster-than-c Signals, Special Relativity, and Causality10.1006/aphy.2002.6233 ↗
12. Causally symmetric Bohm model10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.04.004 ↗
13. Toy models for retrocausality10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.05.006 ↗
14. Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How the Quantum World Says “Maybe”10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.12.003 ↗
15. Disentangling the quantum world10.3390/e17117752 ↗
16. Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?10.1098/rspa.2016.0607 ↗
17. Wharton, K. (2018). A New Class of Retrocausal Models. Entropy, 20.10.3390/e20060410 ↗
18. Exploring the limits of no backward in time signalling10.22331/q-2019-12-09-211 ↗
19. Aharonov, Y., Cohen, E., and Landsberger, T. (2017). The two-time interpretation and macroscopic time-reversibility. Entropy, 19.10.3390/e19030111 ↗
20. Bohm, D., and Hiley, B.J. (1993). The Undivided Universe, Routledge.
21. Holland, P.R. (1993). The Quantum Theory of Motion, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511622687 ↗
22. Dürr, D., and Teufel, S. (2009). Bohmian Mechanics, Springer.10.1007/b99978 ↗
23. Greenberger, D., Hentschel, K., and Weinert, F. (2009). Bohmian Mechanics. Compendium of Quantum Physics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7 ↗
24. Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3373 ↗
25. Lorentz-invariant “elements of reality” and the joint measurability of commuting observables10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3369 ↗
26. Generic quantum nonlocality10.1016/0375-9601(92)90711-T ↗
27. Measurements of nonlocal variables and demonstration of the failure of the product rule for a pre- and postselected pair of photons10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.100405 ↗
28. A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables10.1103/PhysRev.85.166 ↗
29. Margalit, Y., Zhou, Z., Dobkowski, O., Japha, Y., Rohrlich, D., Moukouri, S., and Folman, R. (2018). Realization of a complete Stern-Gerlach interferometer. arXiv.
30. Daumer, M., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zanghì, N. (1996, January 14–17). Naive realism about operators. Proceedings of the International Conference “Probability, Dynamics and Causality”, Beijing, China.10.1007/978-94-011-5712-4_15 ↗
31. A Turing test for free will10.1098/rsta.2011.0331 ↗
32. Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3197 ↗
33. Observation of 23 supernovae that exploded <300 pc from Earth during the past 300 kyr10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/29 ↗
34. Bohmian mechanics for instrumentalists10.1142/S0219749919500291 ↗
35. Fankauser, J. (2017). Taming the delayed choice quantum eraser. arXiv.
36. Can a future choice affect a past measurement’s outcome?10.1016/j.aop.2015.02.020 ↗
37. Finally making sense of the double-slit experiment10.1073/pnas.1704649114 ↗
38. Relativistic independence bounds nonlocality10.1126/sciadv.aav8370 ↗
39. Peres, A. (1993). Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods, Kluwer ac. Publ.
40. Unperformed experiments have no results10.1119/1.11393 ↗