Biomechanical Effects of Diameters of Implant Body and Implant Platform in Bone Strain around an Immediately Loaded Dental Implant with Platform Switching Concept
Source abstract
Abstract
Dental implants designed with platform switching have been used clinically to reduce crestal bone resorption. The aim of this study was to determine the biomechanical effects of loading types, diameter of platform, and implant diameter in bone strain around immediately loaded implants with platform switching concept. Platform-switching features of dental implants with various diameters of implant body and implant platform (named as RP5.0, RP4.3, and NP3.5) were inserted into artificial bone blocks. The initial implant stability was confirmed using a Periotest device before the loading test. Rosette strain gauges were placed on the alveolar region around the implants, and peak values of the bone strain during a 190-N vertical load or 30-degree lateral load were measured by a data acquisition system. The Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc pairwise comparisons were performed as statistical analyses. The median Periotest values of the RP5.0, RP4.3, and NP3.5 implants ranged from −6.59 to −7.34. The RP5.0 implant always showed the lowest bone strain around the implant, regardless of whether a vertical or lateral load was applied. Relative to the RP4.3 and NP3.5 implants, the RP4.3 implant produced a higher bone strain (by approximately 8%) under a vertical load but a lower bone strain (by approximately 25%) under a lateral load. This study confirmed that using a wider implant could relieve the bone strain around an immediately loaded implant with platform switching concept especially under lateral loading.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan
Funding
Chang Gung Medical Foundation · Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: Current status and future developments
2. Dental implants10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.007 ↗
3. Implantology and periodontal disease: The panacea to problem solving?10.2174/1874210601711010460 ↗
4. Critical soft-tissue dimensions with dental implants and treatment concepts10.1111/prd.12045 ↗
5. Factors and techniques influencing peri-implant papillae10.1097/ID.0b013e3181d43bd6 ↗
6. Soft tissue enhancement around dental implants10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00256.x ↗
7. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025 ↗
8. Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.015 ↗
9. Bone strain and interfacial sliding analyses of platform switching and implant diameter on an immediately loaded implant: Experimental and three-dimensional finite element analyses10.1902/jop.2009.090013 ↗
10. Implant–Bone Interface Stress Distribution in Immediately Loaded Implants of Different Diameters: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00453.x ↗
11. Biomechanical simulation of various surface roughnesses and geometric designs on an immediately loaded dental implant10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.03.008 ↗
12. Biomechanical effects of the implant material and implant–abutment interface in immediately loaded small-diameter implants10.1007/s00784-013-1099-8 ↗
13. Biomechanical evaluation of one-piece and two-piece small-diameter dental implants: In-vitro experimental and three-dimensional finite element analyses10.1016/j.jfma.2016.01.002 ↗
14. Rationale for the application of immediate load in implant dentistry: Part I10.1097/01.id.0000140461.25451.31 ↗
15. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00124.x ↗
16. Influence of implasnt length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.008 ↗
17. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels
18. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1902/jop.2010.100232 ↗
19. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: The results of a randomized-controlled trial10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01867.x ↗
20. Implant platform switching concept: An updated review
21. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: A three-dimensional finite element analysis
22. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: Is there any biomechanical rationale?10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01398.x ↗
23. Effect of microthreads and platform switching on crestal bone stress levels: A finite element analysis10.1902/jop.2008.080178 ↗
24. Immediate restoration of NobelActive implants placed into fresh extraction sites in the anterior maxilla10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00254 ↗
25. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of NobelActiveTM dental implants10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02313.x ↗
26. A single-center retrospective analysis of 1001 consecutively placed NobelActive implants10.1097/ID.0b013e3182344fce ↗
27. Clinical evaluation of the NobelActive implant system: A case series of 107 consecutively placed implants and a review of the implant features10.1563/1548-1336-35.6.283 ↗
28. Effect of implant design on initial stability of tapered implants10.1563/1548-1336-35.3.130 ↗
29. Misch, C.E. (1999). Contemporary Implant Dentistry, Mosby Co. [2nd ed.].10.1097/00008505-199901000-00012 ↗
30. A biomechanical assessment of the relation between the oral implant stability at insertion and subjective bone quality assessment10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01047.x ↗
31. In vitro evaluation of a mechanical testing chewing simulator10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.010 ↗
32. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: A three-dimensional finite element analysis10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60259-0 ↗
33. Fem and Von Mises Analysis of OSSTEM® Dental Implant Structural Components: Evaluation of Different Direction Dynamic Loads10.2174/1874210601812010219 ↗
34. Three-dimensional evaluation of different prosthesis retention systems using finite element analysis and the Von Mises stress test