Cyclic Flexural and Shear Performances of Beam Elements with Longitudinal Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bars in Exterior Beam-Column Connections
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this study is to examine the effect of the poor anchorage length of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars used for longitudinal reinforcement on the flexural and shear performances of beam elements in exterior beam–column connections made using high-strength materials. Six exterior beam–column connection specimens were tested under reversal cyclic loads applied at the free-end of the beam. The selected strength categories of materials in the beam element were as follows: 35 MPa and 70 MPa for the design compressive strength of concrete, 400 MPa and 600 MPa for the yield strength of conventional longitudinal steel bars, and 800 MPa for the tensile strength of the GFRP bar. All the longitudinal steel bars of the beams satisfied the minimum requirements of the provisions of ACI 318–14, whereas all the longitudinal GFRP bars of the beam were linearly anchored into the column section, resulting in poor anchorage length, especially for the beam with the concrete compressive strength of 35 MPa. The flexure-governed beams with GFRP bars exhibited a greater increasing rate in displacement at the pre-peak state and did not display the plastic flow characteristic after the peak load when compared with companion beams with steel bars. The beams with GFRP bars possessed lower diagonal cracking strengths and shear capacities than the companion beams with steel bars although the shear capacities of the beams with GFRP bars could be conservatively predicted using the design equation of ACI 440.1R–15 provision. The low elastic modulus and elongation capacity of GFRP bars resulted in large displacements and brittle post-peak beam performances. Furthermore, the lack of anchorage length of GFRP bars in exterior beam–column connection significantly reduced the flexural strength and ductility of the beam element.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Korea
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Flexural behavior of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete beams reinforced with GFRP and steel rebars10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.003 ↗
2. Effect of reinforcement ratio on the flexural performance of hybrid FRP reinforced concrete beams10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.054 ↗
3. Flexural and shear capacities of concrete beam reinforced with GFRP bars10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.023 ↗
4. Design recommendations for bond of GFRP rebars to concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(247) ↗
5. ACI Committee 318 (2014). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318–14) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute.
6. ACI Committee 440.1R-15 (2015). Guide for the Design and Construction of structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars, American Concrete Institute.
7. Influence of fibers on flexural behavior and ductility of concrete beams reinforced with GFRP rebars10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.014 ↗
8. Deitz, D.H., Harik, I.E., and Gesund, H. (1999, January 1). One-way slabs reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer reinforcing bars. Proceedings of the ACI Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium, Detroit, MI, USA.
9. (2000). Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC). Section 16. Fiber Reinforced Structures, Canadian Standards Association. CSA-S6-00.
10. (2014). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM International. ASTM C39/C39M-18.
11. (2014). Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression, ASTM International. ASTM C 469.
12. Architectural Institute of Korea (2016). Korea Building Code, Architectural Institute of Korea. (In Korean).
13. Bae, S.J. (2005). Seismic Performance of Full-Scale Reinforced Concrete Columns. [Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin].
14. Park, R., and Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures, Wiley Inter-Science Publication.10.1002/9780470172834 ↗
15. Reinforced lightweight concrete beams in flexure
16. Rotational capacity of reinforced concrete beams10.1061/JSDEAG.0001504 ↗
17. Confined concrete columns with stubs
18. Cyclic flexural tests of hybrid steel–precast concrete beams with simple connection elements10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.045 ↗