journal article·2009-09

On Measuring of Overall Mechanical Properties of Small Animal Bones using Grid Method

C. Lavet, Y. Lapusta, E. Toussaint, F. Labesse-Jied, G. Poumarat

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 159· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Overall mechanical properties of bones strongly depend on their microstructure. They can be determined by developing adequate micromechanics modeling or by direct experimental measurements. Both approaches are important for a better understanding of the connection between the bone’s microstructure and resulting macro-properties. In this work, a simple experimental method is proposed for the determination of the longitudinal Young’s modulus and Poisson’s coefficient of small, and especially short, bones, based on a combination of compression and grid method. The developed experimental set-up allows measuring the displacement and strain distribution on the surface of the bone sample subjected to a compressive test, as well as the longitudinal Young’s modulus and Poisson’s coefficient. Some results for the determined macroproperties of small bones are presented and compared with the results obtained using a more sophisticated method – the Digital Image Correlation (DIC) one.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Elasticity and Material Modeling · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Akhter M.P., Raab D.M., Turner C.H., Kimmel D.B., Recker R.R. (1992) Characterization of in vivo strain in the rat tibia during external application of a four point bending load. J Biomech 25: 1241–124610.1016/0021-9290(92)90082-C ↗
2. Cowin S.C. (1999) Bone poroelasticity. J Biomech 32: 217–23810.1016/S0021-9290(98)00161-4 ↗
3. Dally J.W., Riley W.F. (1991) Experimental stress analysis. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York
4. Hogan H.A. (1992) Micromechanics modeling of haversian cortical bone properties. J Biomech 25: 549–55610.1016/0021-9290(92)90095-I ↗
5. Inoue, T., Yin, F., Kimura, Y. (2007). Strain distribution and microstructural evolution in multi-pass warm caliber rolling. Materials Science and Engineering 466, 1– 2, 25, 114 – 122.10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.098 ↗
6. Katz J.L. (1980) Anisotropy of Young’s modulus of bone. Nature 283: 106–10710.1038/283106a0 ↗
7. Kavukcuoglu N.B., Denhardt D.T., Guzelsu N., Mann A.B. (2007) Osteopontin deficiency and aging on nanomechanics of mouse bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 83(1): 136–14410.1002/jbm.a.31081 ↗
8. Leung Y.C, Chan L.C., Tang Y., Lee T. (2004) An effective process of strain measurement for severe and localized plastic deformation. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 44(7–8): 669–67610.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.02.009 ↗
9. Lu H., Vendroux G., Knauss W.G. (1997) Surface deformation measurements of a cylindrical specimen by digital image correlation. Journal Experimental Mechanics 37(4): 433–43910.1007/BF02317310 ↗
10. Morimoto Y., Seguchi Y., Higashi T. (1988) Application of Moiré analysis of strain using Fourier transform. Opt. Eng. 27(8): 650–65610.1117/12.7976737 ↗
11. Parks V. (1982) Strain measurement using grids. Opt. Eng. 21: 633–63910.1117/12.7972958 ↗
12. Ramasamy J.G., Akkus O. (2007) Local variations in the micromechanical properties of mouse femur: the involvement of collagen fiber orientation and mineralization. J Biomech 40(4): 910–91810.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.03.002 ↗
13. Sevenhuijsen P.J., Sirkis J.S., Bremand F. (1993) Current trends in obtaining deformation data from grids. Exp. Tech. 17(3): 22–2610.1111/j.1747-1567.1993.tb00747.x ↗
14. Sevostianov I., Kachanov M. (1998) On the relationship between microstructure of the cortical bone and its overall elastic properties. International Journal of Fracture 92: L3–L810.1023/A:1007593916936 ↗
15. Sevostianov I., Kachanov M. (2000) Impact of the porous microstructure on the overall elastic properties of the osteonal cortical bone. J Biomech 33: 881–88810.1016/S0021-9290(00)00031-2 ↗
16. Sirkis J.S., Lim T.J. (1991) Displacement and strain measurement with automated grid methods. Exp. Mech. 31(4): 382–38810.1007/BF02325997 ↗
17. Sklad M.P. (2004) Aspects of automated measurement of proportional and non–proportional deformation in sheet metal forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 145: 377–38410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.09.004 ↗
18. Sowerby R., Chu E., Duncan J.L. (1982) Determination of the large strains in metal forming. J. Strain Anal. 17(4): 95–10110.1243/03093247V172095 ↗
19. Spatz H.C., O’Leary E.J., Vincent J.F. (1996) Young’s moduli and shear moduli in cortical bone. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 263: 287–29410.1098/rspb.1996.0044 ↗
20. Takeda M., Ina H., Kobayashi S. (1982) Fourier–transform method of fringe–pattern analysis for computerbased topography and interferometry. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72: 156–16010.1364/JOSA.72.000156 ↗
21. Tang B., Ngan A.H., Lu W.W. (2007) An improved method for the measurement of mechanical properties of bone by nanoindentation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18(9): 1875–188110.1007/s10856-007-3031-8 ↗
22. Turner C.H., Burr D.B. (1993) Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial. Bone 14: 595–60810.1016/8756-3282(93)90081-K ↗
23. Vacher P., Dumoulin S., Morestin F., Mguil–Touchal S. (1999) Bidimensional strain measurement using digital images. Proc. Mech. Engrg. Part C, J. Mech. Engrg. Sci. 213: 811–81710.1243/0954406991522428 ↗