journal article·2022-10-04Open access

A Conceptual Framework for Designing Virtual Environments for Stress Therapy

Farhah Amaliya Zaharuddin, Nazrita Ibrahim, Azmi Mohd Yusof

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 19

Abstract

Virtual reality for stress therapy has been shown to be effective in reducing stress. However, the majority of the existing studies have only focused on investigating the effectiveness of virtual reality application as a stress reduction tool. Limited information was communicated on how the virtual environments used were designed. Existing design frameworks which may potentially be used as a reference turned out to be providing general guidelines and were not specifically developed for designing a virtual environment for stress therapy. The frameworks were also found to focus on either improving psychological well-being or virtual reality design respectively. To address the identified gap, this study proposed a framework for designing virtual environments for stress therapy. The framework incorporates design requirements from a psychological and information technology point of view. In addition, the framework also highlights the design elements that were specifically needed to design a virtual environment to reduce stress. This paper hence describes the framework and discusses the framework evaluation. Four methods, including (i) questionnaire, (ii) physiological measures, (iii) experiment and (iv) interview were used to evaluate the (i) effectiveness, (ii) usability, (iii) ease of use and (iv) usefulness of the system that implemented the concept of the framework in reducing stress. In addition, the methods were also used to assess the usefulness of the design elements listed in the framework to reduce stress. The results of the evaluation indicated that the system was (i) effective, (ii) usable, (iii) useful and (iv) easy to use to reduce stress. The results also showed that the proposed design elements were useful in aiding the stress-reduction process. As all the results returned positive findings, the framework was thus considered appropriate and suitable to be used as a guideline for designing virtual environments for stress therapy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Art Therapy and Mental Health

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Graduate Studies, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia

Institute of Informatics and Computing in Energy, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia

College of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia

Funding

Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN)

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Method for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury10.5535/arm.19181 ↗
2. Pereira, M.F., Prahm, C., Kolbenschlag, J., Oliveira, E., and Rodrigues, N.F. (2020, January 12–14). A Virtual Reality Serious Game for Hand Rehabilitation Therapy. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 8th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/SeGAH49190.2020.9201789 ↗
3. Stroke Rehabilitation Using Virtual Environments10.1016/j.pmr.2015.06.001 ↗
4. Virtual reality in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review of reviews10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102480 ↗
5. Virtual reality—A valuable tool to advance treatment of mental disorders10.12740/APP/101654 ↗
6. A Literature Overview of Virtual Reality (VR) in Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: Recent Advances and Limitations10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00505 ↗
7. Virtual Reality for Supporting the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety: Scoping Review10.2196/29681 ↗
8. Virtual Reality in Clinical Psychology
9. Virtual Reality Clinical Research: Promises and Challenges10.2196/10839 ↗
10. The Use of Virtual Reality in Psychiatry: A Review10.5765/jkacap.190037 ↗
11. The effects of virtual reality on mental wellness: A literature review
12. Head-Mounted Virtual Reality and Mental Health: Critical Review of Current Research10.2196/games.9226 ↗
13. L’utilisation de la réalité virtuelle dans le traitement des troubles mentaux10.1016/j.lpm.2013.01.065 ↗
14. Effect of Virtual Reality on Stress Reduction and Change of Physiological Parameters Including Heart Rate Variability in People with High Stress: An Open Randomized Crossover Trial10.3389/fpsyt.2021.614539 ↗
15. Straßmann, C., Eimler, S.C., Arntz, A., Keßler, D., Zielinski, S., Brandenberg, G., Dümpel, V., and Handmann, U. (2019, January 4–9). Relax Yourself—Using Virtual Reality to Enhance Employees’ Mental Health and Work Performance. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference, Glasgow, UK.10.1145/3290607.3312946 ↗
16. Lin, X., Mahmud, S., Jones, E., Shaker, A., Miskinis, A., Kanan, S., and Kim, J.-H. (2020, January 6–8). Virtual Reality-Based Musical Therapy for Mental Health Management. Proceedings of the 2020 10th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CCWC47524.2020.9031157 ↗
17. Ahmaniemi, T., Lindholm, H., Muller, K., and Taipalus, T. (2017, January 13–15). Virtual reality experience as a stress recovery solution in workplace. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Life Sciences Conference (LSC), Sydney, Australia.10.1109/LSC.2017.8268179 ↗
18. Das Thoondee, K., and Oikonomou, A. (2017, January 18–20). Using virtual reality to reduce stress at work. Proceedings of the Computing Conference, London, UK.10.1109/SAI.2017.8252142 ↗
19. Taneja, A., Vishal, S.B., Mahesh, V., and Geethanjali, B. (2017, January 16–18). Virtual reality based neuro-rehabilitation for mental stress reduction. Proceedings of the 2017 Fourth International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication and Networking (ICSCN), Chennai, India.10.1109/ICSCN.2017.8085665 ↗
20. Andersen, T., Anisimovaite, G., Christiansen, A., Hussein, M., Lund, C., Nielsen, T., Rafferty, E., Nilsson, N.C., Nordahl, R., and Serafin, S. (2017, January 18–22). A preliminary study of users’ experiences of meditation in virtual reality. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1109/VR.2017.7892317 ↗
21. Positive Technology: Using Interactive Technologies to Promote Positive Functioning10.1089/cyber.2011.0139 ↗
22. Calvo, R.A., and Peters, D. (2014). Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9764.001.0001 ↗
23. Positive Design: An Introduction to Design for Subjective Well-Being
24. The design space of dynamic interactive virtual environments10.1007/s10055-013-0232-y ↗
25. Domain-Specific Design of 3D Interaction Techniques: An Approach for Designing Useful Virtual Environment Applications10.1162/pres.18.5.370 ↗
26. A framework to design 3D interaction assistance in constraints-based virtual environments10.1007/s10055-014-0247-z ↗
27. Zaharuddin, F.A., Ibrahim, N., Yusof, A.M., Rusli, M.E., and Mahidin, E.M.M. (2019, January 19–21). Virtual Environment for VR-Based Stress Therapy System Design Element: User Perspective. Proceedings of the International Visual Informatics Conference, Bangi, Malaysia.10.1007/978-3-030-34032-2_3 ↗
28. Virtual Reality Application for Stress Therapy: Issues and Challenges10.35940/ijeat.A2656.109119 ↗
29. Experts Review on Factors to Consider When Designing Virtual Environment for Stress Therapy10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.1153 ↗
30. Emotional, Restorative and Vitalizing Effects of Forest and Urban Environments at Four Sites in Japan10.3390/ijerph110707207 ↗
31. Mobile health app usability and quality rating scales: A systematic review
32. Hajesmaeel-Gohari, S., Khordastan, F., Fatehi, F., Samzadeh, H., and Bahaadinbeigy, K. (2022). The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 22.10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2 ↗
33. Sauro, J., and Lewis, J. (2011, January 7–12). When Designing Usability Questionnaires, Does It Hurt to Be Positive?. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1145/1978942.1979266 ↗
34. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology10.2307/249008 ↗
35. AlQudah, A.A., Al-Emran, M., and Shaalan, K. (2021). Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112210537 ↗
36. A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics10.1055/s-0038-1668091 ↗
37. Janeczko, E., Bielinis, E., Wójcik, R., Woźnicka, M., Kędziora, W., Łukowski, A., Elsadek, M., Szyc, K., and Janeczko, K. (2020). When Urban Environment Is Restorative: The Effect of Walking in Suburbs and Forests on Psychological and Physiological Relaxation of Young Polish Adults. Forests, 11.10.3390/f11050591 ↗
38. Wang, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, B., and Chiang, Y. (2019). The Influence of Forest Resting Environments on Stress Using Virtual Reality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16183263 ↗
39. (2022, August 17). All About DASS-21: The Depression, Anxiety & Stress Scale. Available online: https://www.my360wellnesshub.com/post/all-about-dass-21-the-depression-anxiety-stress-scale.
40. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) as a Screener for Depression in Substance Use Disorder Inpatients: A Pilot Study10.1159/000485182 ↗
41. Gomez, F. (2016). A Guide to the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 21), Central and Eastern Sydney Primary Health Networks.
42. Baygi, F., Khonsari, N.M., Agoushi, A., Gelsefid, S.H., Gorabi, A.M., and Qorbani, M. (2021). Prevalence and associated factors of psychosocial distress among seafarers during COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry, 21.10.1186/s12888-021-03197-z ↗
43. Virtual Reality Therapy for Mental Stress Reduction
44. Do Data Characteristics Change according to the Number of Scale Points Used? An Experiment Using 5-Point, 7-Point and 10-Point Scales10.1177/147078530805000106 ↗
45. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale
46. Sauro, J., and Lewis, J.R. (2016). Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-802308-2.00002-3 ↗
47. Fernandes, A., Helawar, R., Lokesh, R., Tari, T., and Shahapurkar, A.V. (2014, January 18–19). Determination of stress using Blood Pressure and Galvanic Skin Response. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Communication and Network Technologies, Sivakasi, India.10.1109/CNT.2014.7062747 ↗
48. Best practices for stress measurement: How to measure psychological stress in health research10.1177/2055102920933072 ↗
49. Takayama, N., Morikawa, T., Koga, K., Miyazaki, Y., Harada, K., Fukumoto, K., and Tsujiki, Y. (2022). Exploring the Physiological and Psychological Effects of Digital Shinrin-Yoku and Its Characteristics as a Restorative Environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19031202 ↗