journal article·2022-07-26Open access

Breast Lesions Screening of Mammographic Images with 2D Spatial and 1D Convolutional Neural Network-Based Classifier

Chia-Hung Lin, Hsiang-Yueh Lai, Pi-Yun Chen, Jian-Xing Wu, Ching-Chou Pai, Chun-Min Su, Hui-Wen Ho

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 15

Abstract

Mammography is a first-line imaging examination that employs low-dose X-rays to rapidly screen breast tumors, cysts, and calcifications. This study proposes a two-dimensional (2D) spatial and one-dimensional (1D) convolutional neural network (CNN) to early detect possible breast lesions (tumors) to reduce patients’ mortality rates and to develop a classifier for use in mammographic images on regions of interest where breast lesions (tumors) may likely occur. The 2D spatial fractional-order convolutional processes are used to strengthen and sharpen the lesions’ features, denoise, and improve the feature extraction processes. Then, an automatic extraction task is performed using a specific bounding box to sequentially pick out feature patterns from each mammographic image. The multi-round 1D kernel convolutional processes can also strengthen and denoise 1D feature signals and assist in the identification of the differentiation levels of normality and abnormality signals. In the classification layer, a gray relational analysis-based classifier is used to screen the possible lesions, including normal (Nor), benign (B), and malignant (M) classes. The classifier development for clinical applications can reduce classifier’s training time, computational complexity level, computational time, and achieve a more accurate rate for meeting clinical/medical purpose. Mammographic images were selected from the mammographic image analysis society image database for experimental tests on breast lesions screening and K-fold cross-validations were performed. The experimental results showed promising performance in quantifying the classifier’s outcome for medical purpose evaluation in terms of recall (%), precision (%), accuracy (%), and F1 score.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Brain Tumor Detection and Classification

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung City 41170, Taiwan

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua 50044, Taiwan

Incubation Center, Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua 50044, Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. (2022, July 24). World Cancer Day 2021: Spotlight on IARC Research Related to Breast Cancer. 1965–2022. Available online: https://www.iarc.who.int/featured-news/world-cancer-day-2021/.
2. (2022, July 24). Ministry Health and Welfare, Taiwan. 2021. Cause of Death Statistics, 2022 Years, Available online: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/lp-1800-113.html.
3. Computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis based on image segmentation and interval analysis10.1080/00051144.2020.1785784 ↗
4. Machine learning techniques for breast cancer computer aided diagnosis using different image modalities: A systematic review10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.12.012 ↗
5. Deep learning in mammography and breast histology, an overview and future trends10.1016/j.media.2018.03.006 ↗
6. Oza, P., Sharma, P., Patel, S., and Bruno, A. (2021). A bottom-up review of image analysis methods for suspicious region detection in mammograms. J. Imaging, 7.10.3390/jimaging7090190 ↗
7. Mammogram mass classification using various geometric shape and margin features for early detection of breast cancer
8. (2010, September 30). Mammography-Breast Imaging Lexicon. Available online: https://radiologyassistant.nl/breast/bi-rads/bi-rads-formammography-and-ultrasound-2013#mammography-breast-imaging-lexicon.
9. Gemignani, M.L. (2012). Breast diseases. Clinical Gynecologic Oncology, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-07419-3.00014-X ↗
10. Histopathologic patterns of breast lesions in Hawassa university comprehensive specialized hospital, Sidama Region, Ethiopia: A six-year retrospective study
11. Can we apply the MRI BI-RADSlexicon morphology descriptors on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography?10.1259/bjr.20160157 ↗
12. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: Usefulness of morphological criteria10.1007/s003300100885 ↗
13. A hybrid framework to evaluate breast abnormality using infrared thermal images10.1109/MCE.2019.2923926 ↗
14. Segmentation of ischemic stroke lesion in brain MRI based on social group optimization and fuzzy-Tsallis entropy10.1007/s13369-017-3053-6 ↗
15. Morris, E.A., Comstock, C.E., and Lee, C.H. (2013). ACR BIRADS® magnetic resonance imaging. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, American College of Radiology.
16. Sickles, E., d’Orsi, C., Bassett, L., Appleton, C., Berg, W., Burnside, E., Feig, S., Gavenonis, S., Newell, M., and Trinh, M. (2013). Acr bi-rads® mammogramphy. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, American College of Radiology.
17. (2021, July 20). Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Available online: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/breast-imaging-reporting-and-data-system-bi-rads?lang=us.
18. A novel solution based on scale invariant feature transform descriptors and deep learning for the detection of suspicious regions in mammogram images10.4103/jmss.JMSS_31_19 ↗
19. Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Kegelmeyer, P., Moore, R., Chang, K., and Munishkumaran, S. (1998). Current status of the digital database for screening mammography. Digital Mammography, Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_75 ↗
20. A curated mammography data set for use in computer-aided detection and diagnosis research10.1038/sdata.2017.177 ↗
21. Toward a standard reference database for computer-aided mammography
22. (2022, July 24). Pilot European Image Processing Archive. The Mini-MIAS Database of Mammograms. Available online: http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/pix/mias/.
23. Mammographic Image Analysis Society (2022, July 24). (MIAS) Database v1.21. Available online: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/250394.
24. Classification of mammogram for early detection of breast cancer using SVM classifier and Hough transform10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.083 ↗
25. Development of intelligent systems based on Bayesian regularization network and neuro-fuzzy models for mass detection in mammograms: A comparative analysis10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.10.017 ↗
26. Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network10.1002/mp.12763 ↗
27. Mammography images segmentation via Fuzzy C-mean and K-mean
28. Attention dense-u-net for automatic breast mass segmentation in digital mammogram10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2914873 ↗
29. Du-net: Convolutional network for the detection of arterial calcifications in mammograms10.1109/TMI.2020.2989737 ↗
30. Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x ↗
31. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683 ↗
32. Mammographic mass segmentation using multichannel and multiscale fully convolutional networks10.1002/ima.22423 ↗
33. Sathyan, A., Martis, D., and Cohen, K. (2020, January 14–15). Mass and calcification detection from digital mammogramsusing UNets. Proceedings of the 2020 7th IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing & Machine Intelligence (ISCMI), Stockholm, Sweden.10.1109/ISCMI51676.2020.9311561 ↗
34. Deep learning for mass detection in full field digital mammograms10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103774 ↗
35. Ben-Ari, R., Akselrod-Ballin, A., Karlinsky, L., and Hashoul, S. (2017, January 18–21). Domain specific convolutional neural nets for detection of architectural distortion in mammograms. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, Melbourne, Australia.10.1109/ISBI.2017.7950581 ↗
36. Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., and Mu, X. (2019, January 9–10). Comparison of multiple feature extractors on Faster RCNN for breast tumor detection. Proceedings of the 2019 8th IEEE International Symposium on Next Generation Electronics, Zhengzhou, China.10.1109/ISNE.2019.8896490 ↗
37. Maqsood, S., Damaševičius, R., and Maskeliunas, R. (2022). TTCNN: A breast cancer detection and classification towards computer-aided diagnosis using digital mammography in early stages. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12073273 ↗
38. Suh, Y.J., Jung, J., and Cho, B.-J. (2020). Automated breast cancer detection in digital mammograms of various densities via deep learning. J. Presonalized Med., 10.10.3390/jpm10040211 ↗
39. Chen, P.-Y., Sun, Z.-L., Wu, J.-X., Pai, C.C., Li, C.-M., Lin, C.-H., and Pai, N.-S. (2021). Photoplethysmo graphy analysis with Duffing–Holmes self-synchronization dynamic errors and 1D CNN-based classifier for upper extremity vascular disease screening. Processes, 9.10.3390/pr9112093 ↗
40. Lin, C.-H., Zhang, F.-Z., Wu, J.-X., Pai, N.-S., Chen, P.Y., Pai, C.-C., and Kan, C.-D. (2022). Posteroanterior chest X-ray image classification with a multilayer 1D convolutional neural network based classifier for cardiomegalylevel screening. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11091364 ↗
41. Chen, P.Y., Zhang, X.-H., Wu, J.-X., Pai, C.C., Hsu, J.-C., Lin, C.-H., and Pai, N.-S. (2022). Automaticbreast tumor screening of mammographic images with optimal convolutional neural network. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12084079 ↗
42. Selvaraju, R.R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., and Batra, D. (2016). Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. arXiv.10.1109/ICCV.2017.74 ↗
43. Viola, P., and Jones, M. (2001, January 8–14). Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Kauai, HI, USA.
44. Ehsan, S., Clark, A.F., ur Rehman, N., and McDonald-Maier, K.D. (2015). Integral images: Efficient algorithms for their Computation and storage in resource-constrained embedded vision systems. Sensors, 15.10.3390/s150716804 ↗
45. Kasagi, A., Tabaru, T., and Tamura, H. (2017, January 25–28). Fast algorithm using summed area tables with unified layer performing convolution and average pooling. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing, Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/MLSP.2017.8168154 ↗
46. Fractional differential mask: A fractional differential-based approach for multiscale texture enhancement10.1109/TIP.2009.2035980 ↗
47. Construction of fractional differential masks based on Riemann-Liouville definition
48. Enhancement of chest X-ray images to improve screening accuracy rate using iterated function system and multilayer fractional-order machine learning classifier
49. Improving performance evaluation based on balanced scorecard with grey relational analysis and data envelopment analysis approaches: Case study in water and wastewater companies10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101762 ↗
50. Chest X-ray image denoising using Nesterov optimization method with total variation regularization10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.210 ↗
51. Arteriovenous shunt stenosis assessment based on empirical mode decomposition and 1D convolutional neural network: Clinical trial stage10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102461 ↗
52. Zhang, X.-H. (2021). A Convolutional Neural Network Assisted Fast Tumor Screening System Based on Fractional-Order Image Enhancement: The Case of Breast X-ray Medical Imaging. [Master’s Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology].
53. Chen, X., Liu, S., Sun, R., and Hong, M. (2019, January 6–9). On the convergence of a class of ADAM-type algorithms for non-convex Optimization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, New Orleans, LA, USA.
54. Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review10.1016/j.neunet.2019.01.012 ↗
55. Embedded feature selection using PSO-kNN: Shape-based diagnosis of microcalcification clusters in Mammography10.5383/JUSPN.03.01.002 ↗
56. Deep and machine learning techniques for medical imaging-based breast cancer: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114161 ↗
57. Automatic detection of atherosclerotic plaque and calcification from intravascular ultrasound Images by using deep convolutional neural networks10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3052486 ↗
58. Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., and Isard, M. (2016, January 2–4). Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Symposium Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Savannah, GA, USA.
59. Computer-aided diagnosis of malignant mammograms using Zernike moments and SVM10.1007/s10278-014-9719-7 ↗
60. Tsai, K.-J., Chou, M.-C., Li, H.-M., Liu, S.-T., Hsu, J.-H., Yeh, W.-C., Hung, C.-M., Yeh, C.-Y., and Hwang, S.-H. (2022). A high-performance deep neural network model for BI-RADS classification of screening mammography. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22031160 ↗
61. A new computer-aided diagnosis system with modified genetic feature selection for BI-RADS classification of breast masses in mammograms10.1155/2020/7695207 ↗
62. Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Moore, R., and Kegelmeyer, W.P. (2000, January 11–14). The digital database for screening mammography. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Toronto, ON, Canada.
63. INbreast: Toward a full-field digital mammo-graphic database10.1016/j.acra.2011.09.014 ↗
64. (2022, July 24). Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), Available online: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health/software-medical-device-samd.
65. SaMD N41 (2022, July 24). Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Clinical Evaluation. Available online: http://www.imdrf.org/docs/imdrf/final/technical/imdrf-tech-170921-samd-n41-clinical-evaluation_1.pdf.