journal article·2022-07-06Open access

Reliability and Efficiency of Metamodel for Numerical Back Analysis of Tunnel Excavation

Yo-Hyun Choi, Sean Seungwon Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 14

Abstract

During tunnel construction, the ground properties, initially evaluated, are continuously assessed and verified through back analysis. This procedure generally requires many numerical analyses, so a metamodel based on artificial neural networks has been used to reduce the number of analyses. More datasets can be used to create more reliable metamodels. However, there are no established rules regarding the optimum number of datasets for a reliable metamodel. Metamodels predicting the vertical displacement of the tunnel crown using five ground parameters (unit weight (γ), uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), material constant mi, geological strength index (GSI), and coefficient of lateral pressure (K)), with 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 values per property, were created to confirm the reliability of the metamodel based on the number of datasets in this study. Metamodels using 6 and 8 values for each property showed 5% and 1% mean absolute percent errors, respectively. These numbers of each of the properties would be appropriate for developing the metamodel. Among the five parameters, only the results of the global sensitivity analyses of GSI and K are higher than 0.9. According to these results, it is verified that assessments based only on these parameters are sufficient in the back analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Earth Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea

Funding

Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport · National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Korean government (MSIT)

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Back analysis of measured displacements of tunnels10.1007/BF01033278 ↗
2. Development of a back analysis program for reasonable derivation of tunnel design parameters
3. Back-analysis of Shimizu Tunnel No. 3 by distinct element modeling10.1016/j.tust.2006.10.001 ↗
4. Back analysis of the measurements performed during the excavation of a shallow tunnel in sand10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199911)23:13<1407::AID-NAG934>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
5. Numerical back analysis for estimation of soil parameters in the Resalat Tunnel project10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00087-7 ↗
6. Longitudinal deformation profile of a tunnel in weak rock mass by using the back analysis method10.1016/j.tust.2017.10.003 ↗
7. Allemang, D., and Hendler, J. (2011). Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-385965-5.10002-0 ↗
8. A case study on a tunnel back analysis to minimize the uncertainty of ground properties based on artificial neural network10.9711/KTAJ.2012.14.1.037 ↗
9. Song, W.-Y. (2011). A Case Study of a Back Analysis of Tunnel Behavior Using Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm, Suwon University.
10. A tunnel back analysis using artificial neural network technique and face mapping data10.9711/KTAJ.2012.14.4.357 ↗
11. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6 ↗
12. Different numerical estimators for main effect global sensitivity indices10.1016/j.ress.2017.04.003 ↗
13. Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., and Tarantola, S. (2008). Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470725184 ↗
14. Board, M. (2011). Itasca FLAC–Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, 7.0, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc.
15. Estimation of the Poisson’s rate of the intact rock in the function of the rigidity
16. Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition
17. A numerical study on the evaluation and prediction of behaviour of overstressed rock masses around deep tunnels10.9711/KTAJ.2016.18.6.557 ↗
18. Sharma, P.V. (1997). Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171168 ↗
19. Recent developments in rock support estimates by the RMi
20. Marinos, P., and Hoek, E. (2000, January 19). GSI: A geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength estimation. Proceedings of the ISRM International Symposium, Melbourne, Australia.
21. KICT (2021). Yearbook of Road Bridge and Tunnel Statistics 2021.
22. An ANN to predict ground condition ahead of tunnel face using TBM operational data10.1007/s12205-019-1460-9 ↗
23. Mamaqani, B.H.M.H. (2014). Numerical Modeling of Ground Movements Associated with Trenchless Box Jacking Technique, The University of Texas at Arlington.
24. Hecht-Nielsen, R. (2000, January 19). Kolmogorov’s mapping neural network existence theorem. Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Networks, Melbourne, Australia.
25. Hush, D.R. (1989, January 24–26). Classification with neural networks: A performance analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems Engineering, Fairborn, OH, USA.10.1109/ICSYSE.1989.48672 ↗
26. Choi, Y.-H., and Lee, S.S. (2021). Predictive Modelling for Blasting-Induced Vibrations from Open-Pit Excavations. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11167487 ↗