journal article·2022-06-15Open access

Optimal Placement of Vibration Sensors for Industrial Robots Based on Bayesian Theory

Qiao Hu, Yangkun Zhang, Xingju Xie, Wenbin Su, Yangyang Li, Liuhao Shan, Xiaojie Yu

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 12

Abstract

This paper presents an optimal sensor placement method for vibration signal acquisition in the field of industrial robot health monitoring and fault diagnosis. Based on the general formula of Bayes and relative entropy, the evaluation function of sensor placement is deduced, and the modal confidence matrix is used to express the redundancy of sensor placement. The optimal placement of vibration sensors is described as a discrete variable optimization problem, which is defined as whether the existing sensor layout can obtain joint state information efficiently. The initial layout of the sensor was obtained from the structural simulation results of the industrial robots, and the initial layout was optimized by the derived objective function. The efficiency of the optimized layout in capturing joint state information is proven by the validation experiment with a simulation model. The problem of popularizing the optimization method in engineering is solved by a verification experiment without a simulation model. The optimal sensor placement method provides a theoretical basis for industrial robots to acquire vibration data effectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Robots, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Vibration Analysis Based Condition Monitoring for Industrial Robots
2. Xue, B. (2021, January 22–24). Remote Infrared Monitoring Method for Faults of Indoor Patrol Robot in Substation. Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Symposium on Mechatronics and Industrial Informatics (ISMII), Zhuhai, China.10.1109/ISMII52409.2021.00013 ↗
3. Research Review of Remote Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Industrial Robots
4. Mi, Y., Xu, F., Tan, J., Wang, X., and Liang, B. (2017, January 26–28). Fault-Tolerant Control of a 2-DOF Robot Manipulator Using Multi-Sensor Switching Strategy. Proceedings of the 2017 36th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Dalian, China.10.23919/ChiCC.2017.8028511 ↗
5. Proactive Middleware for Fault Detection and Advanced Conflict Handling in Sensor Fusion10.1007/978-3-030-20915-5_57 ↗
6. Dynamic Manipulability Analysis of Multi-Arm Space Robot10.1017/S0263574720000077 ↗
7. Kinematics Analysis of a Hybrid Manipulator for Computer Controlled Ultra-Precision Freeform Polishing10.1016/j.rcim.2016.08.003 ↗
8. Effects of Joint Clearance on the Motion Accuracy of Robotic Manipulators
9. Yang, J., Zhang, G., Wang, L., Wang, J., and Wang, H. (2021, January 21). Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Joint Nonlinear Motion Control with Considering the Friction Effect. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 19th World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI), Herl’any, Slovakia.10.1109/SAMI50585.2021.9378674 ↗
10. Attitude Data-Based Deep Hybrid Learning Architecture for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Multi-Joint Industrial Robots10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.08.010 ↗
11. Optimal Sensor Placement for Multi-Setup Modal Analysis of Structures10.1016/j.jsv.2017.04.041 ↗
12. Optimal Layout of Sensors in Large-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges Subjected to Moving Vehicular Loads10.1177/1550147719899376 ↗
13. Dual-Type Sensor Placement for Multi-Scale Response Reconstruction10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.05.007 ↗
14. Modified Monkey Algorithm and Its Application to the Optimal Sensor Placement10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.178-181.2699 ↗
15. Optimal Sensors Placement and Spillover Suppression10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.12.007 ↗
16. Robustness of Optimal Sensor Placement under Parametric Uncertainty10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.022 ↗
17. The Connection between Effective Independence and Modal Kinetic Energy Methods for Sensor Placement10.1016/j.jsv.2007.05.004 ↗
18. Kammer, D.C. (1990, January 23–25). Sensor Placement for On-Orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures. Proceedings of the 1990 American Control Conference, San Diego, CA, USA.10.23919/ACC.1990.4791265 ↗
19. Load Dependent Sensor Placement Method: Theory and Experimental Validation10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.04.014 ↗
20. Optimal Reference Sensor Positions Using Output-Only Vibration Test Data10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.039 ↗
21. Optimal Sensor Placement for Acoustic Underwater Target Positioning With Range-Only Measurements10.1109/JOE.2015.2494918 ↗
22. A Bayesian Approach to Optimal Sensor Placement for Structural Health Monitoring with Application to Active Sensing10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.09.003 ↗
23. The Effect of Prediction Error Correlation on Optimal Sensor Placement in Structural Dynamics10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.05.019 ↗
24. Optimal Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring Using Discrete Optimization10.1088/0964-1726/24/12/125034 ↗
25. Influence of Model Errors in Optimal Sensor Placement10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.033 ↗
26. Simulation-Based Optimal Bayesian Experimental Design for Nonlinear Systems10.1016/j.jcp.2012.08.013 ↗