journal article·2022-03-29Open access

Critical Materials Determination as a Complement to the Product Recycling Desirability Model for Sustainability in Malaysia

Al Amin Mohamed Sultan, Yoong Qi Hang, Wan Hasrulnizzam Wan Mahmood, Mohd Shamsuri Md Saad, Paul Tarisai Mativenga

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 7

Abstract

End-of-life waste disposal is a major issue in Malaysia, where the country’s economy has suffered due to waste recovery issues. Many countries have successfully identified critical materials and products for increasing recycling rates, but not in Malaysia. Thus, the Malaysian government and businesses have had difficulty prioritising products for recycling. The absence of critical materials data has meant that a recovery strategy could not be planned wisely. In addition, the Product Recycling Desirability Model that was utilised by many countries to improve their recycling strategy could not be applied to Malaysia, as it requires critical materials data as input. To start with, Malaysia’s important materials have been identified. Next, two risk dimensions are defined: supply risk and material risk. The indicators are then weighted according to Malaysia’s scenarios. The scores are analyzed and applied to the Product Desirability Model to find desirable products for recycling. As a result, 89 materials were classified as critical to Malaysia’s economy, with palladium, rhodium, gold, platinum, and tellurium ranking first through to fifth. Critical materials scoring was used for the first time in Malaysia to comprehend the Product Recycling Desirability Model, a tool for prioritizing products for recycling. Additional analysis reveals that car batteries, tyres, PET bottles, mobile phones, and DVD-R are the top five most important recyclable products in Malaysia. With the material security database readily available and the novel evaluation system being employed to prioritize critical material supply, using risk supply and material security for Malaysia, the government, or private sector, can strategically start to implement recycling policies and initiatives to strengthen recycling efforts, which help to increase recycling rates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Extraction and Separation Processes · Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fakulti Kejuruteraan Pembuatan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Hang Tuah Jaya, Melaka 76100, Malaysia

Infineon Technologies Sdn Bhd, Free Trade Zone Batu Berendam, Melaka 75350, Malaysia

Fakulti Teknologi Kejuruteraan Mekanikal dan Pembuatan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Hang Tuah Jaya, Melaka 76100, Malaysia

Institut Pengurusan Teknologi dan Keusahawanan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Hang Tuah Jaya, Melaka 76100, Malaysia

School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Funding

Ministry of Education

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Reverse channel choice in a closed-loop supply chain with new and differentiated remanufactured goods
2. Sustainable design of a municipal solid waste management system in an integrated closed-loop supply chain network using a fuzzy approach: A case study
3. Sustainable industrial and operation engineering trends and challenges Toward Industry 4.0: A data driven analysis
4. Environmental benefits of recycling
5. Economic potential assessment of neodymium recovery from Malaysia e-waste resource10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.354 ↗
6. Lithium-ion batteries towards circular economy: A literature review of opportunities and issues of recycling treatments10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110500 ↗
7. Recycling of end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) for building products: Concept of processing framework from automotive to construction industries in Malaysia10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.145 ↗
8. Opportunities to improve recycling of automotive lithium ion batteries10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.039 ↗
9. Barteková, E., and Kemp, R. (2021, August 23). Critical Raw Material Strategies in Different World Regions (Issue 31). Available online: https://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2016/wp2016-005.pdf.
10. Methodology of metal criticality determination10.1021/es203534z ↗
11. Gupta, V., Biswas, T., and Ganean, K. (2016). Critical Non-Fuel Mineral Resources for India’s Manufacturing Sector: A Vision for 2030.
12. Chinese assessments of “critical” and “strategic” raw materials: Concepts, categories, policies, and implications
13. Criticality assessment of metals for japan’s resource strategy10.2320/matertrans.M2014380 ↗
14. Material criticality and circular economy: Necessity of manufacturing oriented strategies10.1016/j.procir.2019.01.056 ↗
15. Forecasting quantities of critical raw materials in obsolete feature and smart phones in Greece: A path to circular economy10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114566 ↗
16. How economic indicators impact the EU internal demand for critical raw materials10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102417 ↗
17. Selecting and prioritizing material resources by criticality assessments10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.006 ↗
18. A review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104617 ↗
19. Materials Availability: Comparison of material criticality studies—Methodologies and results Working Paper III
20. Schrijvers, D., Blengini, G.A., Cimprich, A., Chen, W., Correia, V., Eggert, R., Gupta, V., Hagelüken, C., Hirohata, A., and Ku, A. (2021, August 25). Material Criticality: An Overview for Decision-Makers. Available online: https://irtc.info/brochure/.
21. Morley, N., and Eatherley, D. (2008). Material Security: Ensuring Resource Availability for the UK Economy, C-Tech Innovation Ltd.
22. Criticality of non-fuel minerals: A review of major approaches and analyses10.1021/es200563g ↗
23. Recommendations for assessing materials criticality
24. Sébastien, S., Kong, M.A., Planchon, M., Saidi, N., Devauze, C., Petavratzi, E., Gunn, G., Brown, T., Shaw, R., and Lefebvre, G. (2017). Study on the review of the list of Critical Raw Materials Criticality Assessments. Office of the European Union (Issue 2), European Commission.
25. Fortier, S.M., Nassar, N.T., Lederer, G.W., Brainard, J., Gambogi, J., and McCullough, E.A. (2018). Draft Critical Mineral List—Summary of Methodology and Background Information—U.S. Geological Survey.
26. Evaluating the sufficiency of Japan’s mineral resource entitlements for supply risk mitigation10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.02.004 ↗
27. Mineral resources of high-tech metals in Russia: State of the art and outlook10.1134/S1075701516020021 ↗
28. Sustainable Location Identification Decision Protocol (SuLIDeP) for determining the location of recycling centres in a circular economy10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.104 ↗
29. What should be recycled: An integrated model for product recycling desirability10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.201 ↗
30. Dahmus, J., and Gutowski, T. (2006, January 8–11). Material Recycling at Product End-of-Life. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650062 ↗
31. Eco-Innovation (2020, August 23). Glossary of Terms Used in the Eco-Innovation Observatory. European Commission’s Directorate-General for the Environment. Available online: http://www.eco-innovation.eu/.
32. In search of technology readiness level (TRL) 1010.1016/j.ast.2015.07.007 ↗
33. Minerals and Geoscience Department Malaysia (2014). Malaysian Minerals Yearbook 2013.
34. Spencer, B. (2022, January 23). 2016 Minerals Yearbook Malaysia [Advance Release] (Issue May), Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/media/files/mineral-industry-malaysia-2016-pdf.
35. NRC (2008). Minerals, Critical Minerals, and the U.S. Economy—Report in Brief, NRC.