A Theoretical Approach to Ordinal Classification: Feature Space-Based Definition and Classifier-Independent Detection of Ordinal Class Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Ordinal classification (OC) is a sub-discipline of multi-class classification (i.e., including at least three classes), in which the classes constitute an ordinal structure. Applications of ordinal classification can be found, for instance, in the medical field, e.g., with the class labels order, early stage-intermediate stage-final stage, corresponding to the task of classifying different stages of a certain disease. While the field of OC was continuously enhanced, e.g., by designing and adapting appropriate classification models as well as performance metrics, there is still a lack of a common mathematical definition for OC tasks. More precisely, in general, a classification task is defined as an OC task, solely based on the corresponding class label names. However, an ordinal class structure that is identified based on the class labels is not necessarily reflected in the corresponding feature space. In contrast, naturally any kind of multi-class classification task can consist of a set of arbitrary class labels that form an ordinal structure which can be observed in the current feature space. Based on this simple observation, in this work, we present our generalised approach towards an intuitive working definition for OC tasks, which is based on the corresponding feature space and allows a classifier-independent detection of ordinal class structures. To this end, we introduce and discuss novel, OC-specific theoretical concepts. Moreover, we validate our proposed working definition in combination with a set of traditionally ordinal and traditionally non-ordinal data sets, and provide the results of the corresponding detection algorithm. Additionally, we motivate our theoretical concepts, based on an illustrative evaluation of one of the oldest and most popular machine learning data sets, i.e., on the traditionally non-ordinal Fisher’s Iris data set.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques · Machine Learning and Data Classification
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Neural Information Processing, Ulm University, James-Franck-Ring, 89081 Ulm, Germany
Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Bellmann, P., Lausser, L., Kestler, H.A., and Schwenker, F. (2020). Introducing Bidirectional Ordinal Classifier Cascades Based on a Pain Intensity Recognition Scenario, Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.10.1007/978-3-030-68780-9_58 ↗
2. Is an ordinal class structure useful in classifier learning?10.1504/IJDMMM.2008.022537 ↗
3. Detecting Ordinal Class Structures
4. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
5. Liu, Y., Kong, A.W., and Goh, C.K. (2017, January 19–25). Deep Ordinal Regression Based on Data Relationship for Small Datasets. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Melbourne, Australia.10.24963/ijcai.2017/330 ↗
6. Classification of cervical cells leveraging simultaneous super-resolution and ordinal regression10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108208 ↗
7. Niu, Z., Zhou, M., Wang, L., Gao, X., and Hua, G. (2016, January 27–30). Ordinal Regression with Multiple Output CNN for Age Estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.532 ↗
8. Chen, S., Zhang, C., Dong, M., Le, J., and Rao, M. (2017, January 21–26). Using Ranking-CNN for Age Estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.86 ↗
9. Ordinal Regression Methods: Survey and Experimental Study10.1109/TKDE.2015.2457911 ↗
10. Metrics to guide a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for ordinal classification10.1016/j.neucom.2013.05.058 ↗
11. Measuring the Performance of Ordinal Classification
12. A Simple Approach to Ordinal Classification
13. Nearest neighbor pattern classification10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 ↗
14. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., and Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees, Wiley.
15. Vapnik, V. (2013). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer Science & Business Media.
16. Abe, S. (2005). Support Vector Machines for Pattern Classification, Springer. Advances in Pattern Recognition.
17. New approaches to support vector ordinal regression10.1145/1102351.1102370 ↗
18. Modelling ordinal relations with SVMs: An application to objective aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment10.1016/j.neunet.2005.06.023 ↗
19. Support Vector Ordinal Regression10.1162/neco.2007.19.3.792 ↗
20. Assessing phenotype order in molecular data10.1038/s41598-019-48150-z ↗
21. Ordinal Classification: Working Definition and Detection of Ordinal Structures10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021596 ↗
22. Regression models for ordinal data10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x ↗
23. Agresti, A. (2010). Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470594001 ↗
24. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x ↗
25. Kächele, M., Palm, G., and Schwenker, F. (2015, January 22–24). SMO Lattices for the Parallel Training of Support Vector Machines. Proceedings of the ESANN, Bruges, Belgium.
26. Working Set Selection Using Second Order Information for Training Support Vector Machines
27. Dua, D., and Graff, C. (2017). UCI Machine Learning Repository, University of California.
28. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods10.2307/3001968 ↗
29. Bellmann, P., Thiam, P., and Schwenker, F. (2021, January 10–15). Using Meta Labels for the Training of Weighting Models in a Sample-Specific Late Fusion Classification Architecture. Proceedings of the ICPR, Milan, Italy.10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9412509 ↗
30. Bagging Predictors10.1007/BF00058655 ↗
31. Snoek, C., Worring, M., and Smeulders, A.W.M. (2005, January 6–11). Early versus late fusion in semantic video analysis. Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia, Singapore.10.1145/1101149.1101236 ↗
32. Schäfer, L.M. (2021). Systems Biology of Tumour Evolution: Estimating Orders from Omics Data. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Ulm].
33. Geometrical and Statistical Properties of Systems of Linear Inequalities with Applications in Pattern Recognition10.1109/PGEC.1965.264137 ↗
34. Ordinal Classifiers Can Fail on Repetitive Class Structures
35. Walter, S., Gruss, S., Ehleiter, H., Tan, J., Traue, H.C., Crawcour, S.C., Werner, P., Al-Hamadi, A., and Andrade, A.O. (2013, January 13–15). The biovid heat pain database data for the advancement and systematic validation of an automated pain recognition system. Proceedings of the CYBCONF, Lausanne, Switzerland.10.1109/CYBConf.2013.6617456 ↗
36. Adaptive confidence learning for the personalization of pain intensity estimation systems10.1007/s12530-016-9158-4 ↗
37. Methods for Person-Centered Continuous Pain Intensity Assessment From Bio-Physiological Channels10.1109/JSTSP.2016.2535962 ↗