journal article·2021-11-02Open access

The Role of Biomethane from Sewage Sludge in the Energy Transition: Potentials and Barriers in the Arab Gulf States Power Sector

Mohammad Alshawaf, Abdalrahman Alsulaili, Mohamed Alwaeli, Huda Allanqawi

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 21

Abstract

The increasing energy and water demands by the Arab Gulf states highlight the importance of sustainable use of energy resources. Wastewater sludge management for energy recovery creates an opportunity for sector integration for both wastewater treatment plants and renewable energy production. The objective of this study was to theoretically estimate the biomethane potential of wastewater sludge, together with identification of the role of biomethane in the region. The prediction of biomethane potential was based on the theoretical stoichiometry of biomethanation reactions, using the R-based package ‘Process Biogas Data and Predict Biogas Production’. The biomethane potential of sludge ranges between 232–334 × 106 m3, with a total heat-value up to 10.7 trillion BTUs annually. The produced biomethane can generate up to 1665 GWh of electric energy, an equivalent amount to the current levels of electricity generation from wind and solar power combined. The findings from the case study on Kuwait’s indicate that biomethane could displace 13 × 106 m3 of natural gas, or approximately 86,000 barrels of crude oil, while simultaneously reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 86% when compared to the base-scenario. Despite its potential, biomethane recovery in the region is hindered by technical-, economic-, and policy-based barriers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production · Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Environmental Technology Management Department, College of Life Sciences, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 5969, Safat, Kuwait City 13060, Kuwait

Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 5969, Safat, Kuwait City 13060, Kuwait

Department of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Pumping Stations and Treatment Plants Department, Ministry of Public Works, Safat, Kuwait City 13001, Kuwait

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. IRENA (2020). Global Renewables Outlook: Energy Transformation 2050, IRENA.
2. IEA (2020, April 29). Data & Statistics [WWW Document]. Available online: https://www.iea.org.
3. IEA (2020, April 29). Renewables 2019. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2019.
4. Mes, T.Z.D., de Stams, A.J.M., Reith, J.H., and Zeeman, G. (2003). Methane production by anaerobic digestion of wastewater and solid wastes. Bio-Methane & Bio-Hydrogen: Status and Perspectives of Biological Methane and Hydrogen Production, Dutch Biological Hydrogen Foundation.
5. Van Foreest, F. (2012). Perspectives for Biogas in Europe, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.10.26889/9781907555633 ↗
6. IEA (2020, May 05). Outlook for Biogas and Biomethane: Prospects for Organic Growth. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/outlook-for-biogas-and-biomethane-prospects-for-organic-growth/.
7. IEA (2020, May 05). The Role of Gas in Today’s Energy Transitions. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-gas-in-todays-energy-transitions/.
8. Biogas between Renewable Energy and Bio-Economy Policies—Opportunities and Constraints Resulting from a Dual Role
9. Contributions of Flexible Power Generation from Biomass to a Secure and Cost-Effective Electricity Supply—A Review of Potentials, Incentives and Obstacles in Germany
10. Flexible bioenergy supply for balancing fluctuating renewables in the heat and power sector—A review of technologies and concepts
11. Renewable energy from biogas with reduced carbon dioxide footprint: Implications of applying different plant configurations and operating pressures10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.076 ↗
12. GCC-STAT (2021, April 28). GCC Statistical Center [WWW Document]. Available online: https://www.gccstat.org/.
13. IRENA (2020, August 24). Data & Statistics [WWW Document]. Available online: https://www.irena.org/Statistics.
14. Alsheyab, M., and Kusch-Brandt, S. (2018). Potential Recovery Assessment of the Embodied Resources in Qatar’s Wastewater. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10093055 ↗
15. Abushammala, M.F.M., Qazi, W.A., Azam, M.H., Mehmood, U.A., Al-Mufragi, G.A., and Alrawahi, N.A. (2016, January 15–16). Generation of electricity from biogas in Oman. Proceedings of the 2016 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City, ICBDSC 2016, Muscat, Oman.10.1109/ICBDSC.2016.7460374 ↗
16. Shanableh, A., Maalej, M., Barakat, S., Omar, M., Al-Toubat, S., Al-Ruzouq, R., and Hamad, K. (2017, January 18–20). Extraction Solvent’s Effect on Biogas Production from Mixtures of Date Seed and Wastewater Sludge. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials & Civil Engineering Systems (ASCMCES-17), Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
17. Biodegradable waste to biogas: Renewable energy option for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
18. Estimation of bioenergy potential for local biomass in the United Arab Emirates
19. Waste to biodiesel: A preliminary assessment for Saudi Arabia10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.024 ↗
20. Ferella, F., and Broeke, L.J.P. (October, January 27). An integrated approach for the generation of renewable energy from biomass and waste streams. Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
21. Energy recovery and nutrients recycling from municipal sewage sludge10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136775 ↗
22. Potential of fecal waste for the production of biomethane, bioethanol and biodiesel10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.05.013 ↗
23. Modeling of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Plant for Electricity Generation in Kuwait
24. Production of syngas via gasification using optimum blends of biomass10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118499 ↗
25. The state of technologies and research for energy recovery from municipal wastewater sludge and biosolids10.1016/j.coesh.2019.12.004 ↗
26. Sludge: A waste or renewable source for energy and resources recovery?10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.029 ↗
27. Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: Brief overview and energy efficiency assessment10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.014 ↗
28. Pretreatment and co-digestion of wastewater sludge for biogas production: Recent research advances and trends10.1016/j.rser.2019.109287 ↗
29. Methods for determination of biomethane potential of feedstocks: A review10.18331/BRJ2017.4.2.3 ↗
30. The Methane Fermentation of Carbohydrates10.1021/ja01332a039 ↗
31. McCarty, L.P. (1972). Energetics of organic matter degradation. Water Microbiol., 91–118.
32. Biochemical methane potential prediction of plant biomasses: Comparing chemical composition versus near infrared methods and linear versus non-linear models10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.115 ↗
33. Biogas Production: Current State and Perspectives10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7 ↗
34. Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants10.1007/s11157-004-2502-3 ↗
35. Korres, N.E., Kiely, P.O., Jonathan, S.W., and Benzie, J.A.H. (2013). Bioenergy Anaerobic by Digestion and Wastes: Using Agricultural Biomass and Organic Wastes, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. [1st ed.].
36. Process characteristics, inhibition factors and methane yields of anaerobic digestion process, with particular focus on microalgal biomass fermentation10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.041 ↗
37. The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.021 ↗
38. Software for biogas research: Tools for measurement and prediction of methane production10.1016/j.softx.2018.06.005 ↗
39. Rittmann, B.E., and McCarty, P.L. (2001). Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications, McGraw-Hill Education.
40. Hafner, S.D., and Rennuit, C. (2021, June 17). Predicting Methane and Biogas Production with the Biogas Package. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/biogas/vignettes/predBg_function.pdf/.
41. SCAD (2021, April 28). Statistics Centre Abu Dhabi [WWW Document], Water Stat., Available online: https://www.scad.gov.ae/.
42. Field accumulation risks of heavy metals in soil and vegetable crop irrigated with sewage water in western region of Saudi Arabia10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.09.023 ↗
43. Characterization of domestic wastewater treatment in Oman from three different regions and current implications of treated effluents10.1007/s10661-013-3572-x ↗
44. PSA (2021, April 28). Qatar Planning and Statistics Authority—Water Statistics [WWW Document], Available online: https://www.psa.gov.qa/.
45. MPW (2021, April 28). Ministry of Public Works (Kuwait) [WWW Document], Available online: https://www.mpw.gov.kw/.
46. CSB (2020, July 20). Statistics of the Environment [WWW Document], Cent. Stat. Bur., Available online: https://www.csb.gov.kw/.
47. Filer, J., Ding, H.H., and Chang, S. (2019). Biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay method for anaerobic digestion research. Water, 11.10.3390/w11050921 ↗
48. The Anaerobic Biodegradability of Municipal Sludge and Fat, Oil, and Grease at Mesophilic Conditions10.2175/106143007X220699 ↗
49. US EPA (2021, June 17). Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-04/documents/emission-factors_apr2021.pdf/.
50. Chow, W.L., Chong, S., Lim, J.W., Chan, Y.J., Chong, M.F., Tiong, T.J., Chin, J.K., and Pan, G.T. (2020). Anaerobic co-digestion of wastewater sludge: A review of potential co-substrates and operating factors for improved methane yield. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8010039 ↗
51. Thanikal, J., Torrijos, M., Sousbie, P., Rizwan, S., Kumar, R., and Yazidi, H. (2014, January 2). Municipal sewage sludge as co-substrate in anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste and biogas yield. Proceedings of the IWA Conference on Small Water and Wastewater Systems and Resources Oriented Sanitation, Muscat, Oman.
52. Methane production from process water of sewage sludge hydrothermal carbonization. A review. Valorising sludge through hydrothermal carbonization10.1080/10643389.2018.1561104 ↗
53. Development of statistical predictive models for estimating the methane yield of Italian municipal sludges from chemical composition: A preliminary study10.2166/wst.2019.063 ↗
54. Air Pollution and the Demand for Hospital Services: A Review10.1016/j.envint.2004.01.004 ↗
55. An overview of bio augmentation of methane by anaerobic co-digestion of municipal sludge along with microalgae and waste paper10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.121 ↗
56. Valorization of biogas production through disintegration of waste activated sludge using visible light ZnO-ZnS/Ag2O-Ag2S photocatalyst10.1016/j.psep.2018.08.022 ↗
57. Wastewater sludge stabilization using pre-treatment methods10.1016/j.psep.2016.05.022 ↗
58. IRENA (2021, January 01). Biogas for Road Vehicles: Technology Brief. Abu Dhabi., Available online: https://www.irena.org/publications/2017/Mar/Biogas-for-road-vehicles-Technology-brief/.
59. Biogas as a Renewable Energy Fuel—A Review of Biogas Upgrading, Utilisation and Storage10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.035 ↗
60. Fraunhofer ISE (2021, January 01). Levelized Cost of Electricity Renewable Energy Technologies. Available online: https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/publications/studies/cost-of-electricity.html/.