Show source-provided references
1. IRENA (2020). Global Renewables Outlook: Energy Transformation 2050, IRENA.
2. IEA (2020, April 29). Data & Statistics [WWW Document]. Available online: https://www.iea.org.
3. IEA (2020, April 29). Renewables 2019. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2019.
4. Mes, T.Z.D., de Stams, A.J.M., Reith, J.H., and Zeeman, G. (2003). Methane production by anaerobic digestion of wastewater and solid wastes. Bio-Methane & Bio-Hydrogen: Status and Perspectives of Biological Methane and Hydrogen Production, Dutch Biological Hydrogen Foundation.
5. Van Foreest, F. (2012). Perspectives for Biogas in Europe, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
10.26889/9781907555633 ↗6. IEA (2020, May 05). Outlook for Biogas and Biomethane: Prospects for Organic Growth. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/outlook-for-biogas-and-biomethane-prospects-for-organic-growth/.
7. IEA (2020, May 05). The Role of Gas in Today’s Energy Transitions. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-gas-in-todays-energy-transitions/.
8. Biogas between Renewable Energy and Bio-Economy Policies—Opportunities and Constraints Resulting from a Dual Role
9. Contributions of Flexible Power Generation from Biomass to a Secure and Cost-Effective Electricity Supply—A Review of Potentials, Incentives and Obstacles in Germany
10. Flexible bioenergy supply for balancing fluctuating renewables in the heat and power sector—A review of technologies and concepts
11. Renewable energy from biogas with reduced carbon dioxide footprint: Implications of applying different plant configurations and operating pressures
10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.076 ↗12. GCC-STAT (2021, April 28). GCC Statistical Center [WWW Document]. Available online: https://www.gccstat.org/.
13. IRENA (2020, August 24). Data & Statistics [WWW Document]. Available online: https://www.irena.org/Statistics.
14. Alsheyab, M., and Kusch-Brandt, S. (2018). Potential Recovery Assessment of the Embodied Resources in Qatar’s Wastewater. Sustainability, 10.
10.3390/su10093055 ↗15. Abushammala, M.F.M., Qazi, W.A., Azam, M.H., Mehmood, U.A., Al-Mufragi, G.A., and Alrawahi, N.A. (2016, January 15–16). Generation of electricity from biogas in Oman. Proceedings of the 2016 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City, ICBDSC 2016, Muscat, Oman.
10.1109/ICBDSC.2016.7460374 ↗16. Shanableh, A., Maalej, M., Barakat, S., Omar, M., Al-Toubat, S., Al-Ruzouq, R., and Hamad, K. (2017, January 18–20). Extraction Solvent’s Effect on Biogas Production from Mixtures of Date Seed and Wastewater Sludge. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials & Civil Engineering Systems (ASCMCES-17), Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
17. Biodegradable waste to biogas: Renewable energy option for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
18. Estimation of bioenergy potential for local biomass in the United Arab Emirates
20. Ferella, F., and Broeke, L.J.P. (October, January 27). An integrated approach for the generation of renewable energy from biomass and waste streams. Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
23. Modeling of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Plant for Electricity Generation in Kuwait
27. Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: Brief overview and energy efficiency assessment
10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.014 ↗28. Pretreatment and co-digestion of wastewater sludge for biogas production: Recent research advances and trends
10.1016/j.rser.2019.109287 ↗31. McCarty, L.P. (1972). Energetics of organic matter degradation. Water Microbiol., 91–118.
32. Biochemical methane potential prediction of plant biomasses: Comparing chemical composition versus near infrared methods and linear versus non-linear models
10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.115 ↗35. Korres, N.E., Kiely, P.O., Jonathan, S.W., and Benzie, J.A.H. (2013). Bioenergy Anaerobic by Digestion and Wastes: Using Agricultural Biomass and Organic Wastes, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. [1st ed.].
36. Process characteristics, inhibition factors and methane yields of anaerobic digestion process, with particular focus on microalgal biomass fermentation
10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.041 ↗39. Rittmann, B.E., and McCarty, P.L. (2001). Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications, McGraw-Hill Education.
40. Hafner, S.D., and Rennuit, C. (2021, June 17). Predicting Methane and Biogas Production with the Biogas Package. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/biogas/vignettes/predBg_function.pdf/.
41. SCAD (2021, April 28). Statistics Centre Abu Dhabi [WWW Document], Water Stat., Available online: https://www.scad.gov.ae/.
42. Field accumulation risks of heavy metals in soil and vegetable crop irrigated with sewage water in western region of Saudi Arabia
10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.09.023 ↗43. Characterization of domestic wastewater treatment in Oman from three different regions and current implications of treated effluents
10.1007/s10661-013-3572-x ↗44. PSA (2021, April 28). Qatar Planning and Statistics Authority—Water Statistics [WWW Document], Available online: https://www.psa.gov.qa/.
45. MPW (2021, April 28). Ministry of Public Works (Kuwait) [WWW Document], Available online: https://www.mpw.gov.kw/.
46. CSB (2020, July 20). Statistics of the Environment [WWW Document], Cent. Stat. Bur., Available online: https://www.csb.gov.kw/.
47. Filer, J., Ding, H.H., and Chang, S. (2019). Biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay method for anaerobic digestion research. Water, 11.
10.3390/w11050921 ↗48. The Anaerobic Biodegradability of Municipal Sludge and Fat, Oil, and Grease at Mesophilic Conditions
10.2175/106143007X220699 ↗49. US EPA (2021, June 17). Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-04/documents/emission-factors_apr2021.pdf/.
50. Chow, W.L., Chong, S., Lim, J.W., Chan, Y.J., Chong, M.F., Tiong, T.J., Chin, J.K., and Pan, G.T. (2020). Anaerobic co-digestion of wastewater sludge: A review of potential co-substrates and operating factors for improved methane yield. Processes, 8.
10.3390/pr8010039 ↗51. Thanikal, J., Torrijos, M., Sousbie, P., Rizwan, S., Kumar, R., and Yazidi, H. (2014, January 2). Municipal sewage sludge as co-substrate in anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste and biogas yield. Proceedings of the IWA Conference on Small Water and Wastewater Systems and Resources Oriented Sanitation, Muscat, Oman.
52. Methane production from process water of sewage sludge hydrothermal carbonization. A review. Valorising sludge through hydrothermal carbonization
10.1080/10643389.2018.1561104 ↗53. Development of statistical predictive models for estimating the methane yield of Italian municipal sludges from chemical composition: A preliminary study
10.2166/wst.2019.063 ↗55. An overview of bio augmentation of methane by anaerobic co-digestion of municipal sludge along with microalgae and waste paper
10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.121 ↗56. Valorization of biogas production through disintegration of waste activated sludge using visible light ZnO-ZnS/Ag2O-Ag2S photocatalyst
10.1016/j.psep.2018.08.022 ↗58. IRENA (2021, January 01). Biogas for Road Vehicles: Technology Brief. Abu Dhabi., Available online: https://www.irena.org/publications/2017/Mar/Biogas-for-road-vehicles-Technology-brief/.
60. Fraunhofer ISE (2021, January 01). Levelized Cost of Electricity Renewable Energy Technologies. Available online: https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/publications/studies/cost-of-electricity.html/.