The Conformity of Rehabilitation Protocols Used for Different Cartilage Repairs of the Knee Joint—A Review on Rehabilitation Standards in German Speaking Countries
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study analysed current rehabilitation protocols to investigate whether there is a standard for early rehabilitation after microfracturing (MFX), matrix-assisted cartilage transplantation (MACT), and osteochondral autograft transfer (OATS) of the knee joint in clinical routine, and if rehabilitation protocols differ in the repair technique used or the localization of the cartilage defect. The evaluation included rehabilitation criteria such as weight-bearing, range of motion, use of an orthosis, motion therapy, and rehabilitation training during the early rehabilitation phase after MFX, MACT, and OATS of the femorotibial and retropatellar joint space. We analysed 153 rehabilitation protocols after cartilage repair of the knee joint, including 137 protocols for after repair of the main weight-bearing (femorotibial) area and 16 for after retropatellar cartilage repair. Most of the protocols differed significantly according to the location of the repair and the procedure performed. Our findings indicate that full weight-bearing can be achieved significantly faster after MFX (5.6 weeks) and OATS (5.3 weeks) than after MACT of the main weight-bearing zone (6.6 weeks, p < 0.001). In addition, after retropatellar cartilage repair, patients are allowed full weight-bearing after 2.1 weeks compared to the main weight-bearing zone (5.3–6.6 weeks; p < 0.001). No standardized rehabilitation recommendations have been established. The present study shows that rehabilitation needs to be adjusted to the surgical technique and the location of the defect zone, and further investigation is warranted to establish standardized rehabilitation protocols after cartilage repair of the knee joint.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Paediatric Surgery and Orthopaedics, Clinic St. Hedwig, Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, KUNO Paediatric University Medical Centre and FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
Centre of Clinical Studies, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Articular cartilage defects in 1000 knee arthroscopies10.1053/jars.2002.32839 ↗
2. Articular cartilage defects: Study of 25,124 knee arthroscopies10.1016/j.knee.2007.02.001 ↗
3. Focal cartilage defects in the knee impair quality of life as much as severe osteoarthritis: A comparison of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in 4 patient categories scheduled for knee surgery10.1177/0363546509352157 ↗
4. Cartilage repair surgery for full-thickness defects of the knee in Germany: Indications and epidemiological data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU)10.1007/s00402-016-2453-5 ↗
5. Autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair
6. Clinical Outcomes After Microfracture of the Knee: Midterm Follow-up10.1177/2325967117753572 ↗
7. Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture for chondral lesions of the knee: Prospective nonrandomized study at 5 years10.1177/0363546508323256 ↗
8. Is implantation of autologous chondrocyte superior to microfracture for articular-cartilage defects of the knee? A systematic review of 5-year follow-up data10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.06.007 ↗
9. Matrix-Applied Characterized Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes Versus Microfracture: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial10.1177/0363546518756976 ↗
10. Current treatments of isolated articular cartilage lesions of the knee achieve similar outcomes10.1007/s11999-012-2304-9 ↗
11. Long-term Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft: A Systematic Review at Long-term Follow-up of 12.3 Years10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.020 ↗
12. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: The role of accelerated chondrocyte senescence
13. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: The role of stress induced chondrocyte damage
14. Autologous chondrocyte implantation postoperative care and rehabilitation: Science and practice10.1177/0363546505281918 ↗
15. The basic science of continuous passive motion in promoting knee health: A systematic review of studies in a rabbit model10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.028 ↗
16. Cartilage atrophy in the knees of patients after seven weeks of partial load bearing10.1002/art.20378 ↗
17. Microfracture: Surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects10.1097/00003086-200110001-00033 ↗
18. Microfracture and specific rehabilitation for treating osteoarthritis of the knee. Indications, surgical technique, and rehabilitation protocol
19. Rehabilitation following osteochondral injury to the knee10.1007/s12178-011-9108-5 ↗
20. Erggelet, C. (2014). Stimulation Thechniques: Microfracturing, Drilling. Techniques in Cartilage Repair Surgery, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-41921-8_4 ↗
21. The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study10.2106/00004623-200509000-00002 ↗
22. The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of full-thickness defects in articular cartilage. An experimental investigation in the rabbit10.2106/00004623-198062080-00002 ↗
23. The use of continuous passive motion following knee cartilage defect surgery: A systematic review10.3928/01477447-20101021-16 ↗
24. Continuous Passive Motion, Early Weight Bearing, and Active Motion following Knee Articular Cartilage Repair; Evidence for Clinical Practice10.1177/1947603510368055 ↗
25. Effect of continuous passive motion for cartilage regenerative surgery—A systematic literature review
26. Rehabilitation after autologous chondrocyte implantation for isolated cartilage defects of the knee10.1177/0363546511404204 ↗
27. Treatment of full-thickness chondral defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte implantation10.2519/jospt.2006.2409 ↗
28. Richardson, J.B. (2014). Classical ACI for Chondral and Ostechondral Defects. Techniques in Cartilage Repair Surgery, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-41921-8_14 ↗
29. Return to Sports Activity and Work after Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation of the Knee: Which Factors Influence Outcomes?10.1177/0363546515614578 ↗
30. Autologous chondrocyte implantation: Current surgery and rehabilitation10.1249/mss.0b013e31815cb228 ↗
31. Return to Sport After Articular Cartilage Repair in Athletes’ Knees: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.028 ↗