Computer-Aided Decision Making for Regional Seismic Risk Mitigation Accounting for Limited Economic Resources
Source abstract
Abstract
Seismic risk mitigation levels for an existing building are a balance between the reduction of risk and the cost of rehabilitation. Evidently, the more that is paid the more risk is reduced; however, due to limited public budgets a practical approach is needed to manage the risk reduction program when a portfolio of buildings is concerned. Basically, decision makers face a challenge when there are a large number of vulnerable buildings and there is no plan for how to allocate the appointed budget. This study develops a technological platform that implements a decision-making procedure to establish how to optimally distribute the budget in order to achieve the maximum possible portfolio risk reduction. Decisions are made based on various presumed intervention strategies dependent on building’s level of risk. The technological platform provides an interactive, user-friendly tool, available online, that supports stakeholders and decision makers in understanding what the best economic resource allocation will be after selecting the available budget for a specific portfolio of buildings. In addition, the ease of use enables the user to analyze the extent of risk reduction achievable for different budget levels. Therefore, the web platform represents a powerful tool to accomplish two challenging tasks, namely optimal budget selection and optimal budget allocation to gain territorial seismic risk mitigation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · BIM and Construction Integration · Construction Project Management and Performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Technologies for Construction, Italian National Research Council (CNR), 80146 Naples, Italy
Department of Engineering, University of Naples Parthenope, 80143 Naples, Italy
ETT S.p.A., 16153 Genova, Italy
Funding
GRISIS project
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. (2021, June 14). Natural Disaster 2019, Emergency Events Database (EM-DAT), Available online: https://www.emdat.be/publications.
2. (2021, June 14). Disaster Risk Reduction: A Global Advocacy Guide, Available online: https://www.ifrc.org/Global/Publications/disasters/reducing_risks/DRR-advocacy-guide.pdf.
3. (2021, June 14). Global Assessment Report (GAR) on Disaster Risk Reduction, Available online: https://gar.undrr.org/sites/default/files/reports/2019-05/full_gar_report.pdf.
4. (2021, June 14). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, Available online: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf.
5. (2021, June 14). Hyogo Framework: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters, Available online: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/1037_hyogoframeworkforactionenglish.pdf.
6. (2021, June 14). Sendai Framework Monitoring System, Available online: https://sendaimonitor.undrr.org/.
7. Seismic Risk Assessment of Residential Buildings in ITALY10.1007/s10518-020-01009-5 ↗
8. IRMA Platform for the Calculation of Damages and Risks of Italian Residential Buildings10.1007/s10518-020-00924-x ↗
9. D’Alpaos, C., and Bragolusi, P. (2020). The market price premium for buildings seismic retrofitting. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12218791 ↗
10. OECD (2018) (2021, June 14). Financial Management of Earthquake Risk. Available online: www.oecd.org/finance/Financial-Management-of-Earthquake-Risk.htm.
11. Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS for earthquake hazard analysis10.1007/s11069-018-3262-7 ↗
12. A decision-making methodology for risk-informed earthquake early warning10.1111/mice.12670 ↗
13. Multi-objective optimization approach to define risk layer for seismic mitigation10.1080/19475705.2016.1199446 ↗
14. Prioritization Strategies to reduce the Seismic Risk of the Public and Strategic Buildings
15. Earthquake Risk–Management Model for Historic Commercial Urban Fabrics10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000359 ↗
16. Preventive planning model for rescue priority management in seismic emergency
17. An automated model for optimizing budget allocation in earthquake mitigation scenarios10.1007/s11069-011-0035-y ↗
18. Implementation of equity in resource allocation for regional earthquake risk mitigation using two-stage stochastic programming10.1111/risa.12321 ↗
19. Caterino, N., Azmoodeh, B.M., and Manfredi, G. (2018). Seismic risk mitigation for a portfolio of reinforced concrete frame buildings through optimal allocation of a limited budget. Adv. Civ. Eng., 18.10.1155/2018/8184756 ↗
20. Seismic risk of RC building classes10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.019 ↗
21. (2008). NTC08, 2008. D.M. 14 Gennaio, Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, Ministero delle Infrastrutture. (In Italian).
22. Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large-scale assessment of RC buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.021 ↗
23. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979::AID-EQE850>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
24. (2004). Eurocode 8—Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, CEN. EN 1998-1.
25. Seismic insurance model for the Italian residential building stock10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.06.001 ↗
26. (2013). Istruzioni per la Valutazione Affidabilistica Della Sicurezza Sismica di Edifici Esistenti 2013, Commissione di Studio per la predispozione e l’Analisi norme Tecniche Relative alle Costruzioni (CNR-DT 212 2013), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche. (In Italian).
27. Development of a seismic risk mitigation methodology for public buildings applied to the hospitals of Basilicata region (Southern Italy)10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.05.011 ↗
28. (2021, March 31). Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/standards/accessibility/index_en.htm.