journal article·2021-03-25Open access

Dynamic Balance of the Head in a Flexible Legged Robot for Efficient Biped Locomotion

Domenico Lisitano, Elvio Bonisoli, Carmine Tommaso Recchiuto, Giovanni Gerardo Muscolo

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 7

Abstract

In the biped robotics domain, head oscillations may be extremely harmful, especially if the robot is teleoperated, since vibrations strongly reduce the operator’s spatial awareness. In particular, undesired head oscillations occur in under-actuated robots, where springs and passive mechanisms are used to achieve a human-like motion. This paper proposes an approach to reduce the vibrations of a biped robot’s head; the proposed solution does not affect the dynamic locomotion properties, on which specific control logic could have been already tuned. The approach is tested on Rollo, a flexible-biped-wheeled robot, whose head vibrates throughout the robot locomotion. The two requirements, i.e., head vibration reduction and unchanged Rollo locomotion properties, are traduced in constraints to the robot possible modifications. Based on a 1D finite element model of the robot, tuned on experimental modal analysis, the undesired vibration causes are detected, and a solution for their reduction is proposed. Rollo’s head vibration amplitude is attenuated using a tuned vibration absorber, which achieves impressive performance in the robot. An archetype of the proposed vibration absorber is tailored designed on Rollo, without invasive changes to the robot structure. The proposed approach solves a significant problem in the biped robotic research community. The approach used to reduce the Rollo head oscillations may be utilized in other biped robot machines with or without flexible legs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Robotic Locomotion and Control · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (DIMEAS), Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics, System Engineering, University of Genova, Via all’Opera Pia, 13, 16145 Genova, Italy

Department of Computer Science, University of Verona, Ca’ Vignal 2-Strada Le Grazie, 15, 37134 Verona, Italy

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Hosoda, Y., Egawa, S., Tamamoto, J., Yamamoto, K., Nakamura, R., and Togami, M. (2006, January 9–15). Basic design of human-symbiotic robot EMIEW. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China.10.1109/IROS.2006.282596 ↗
2. Bigdog, the rough-terrain quadruped robot10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.01833 ↗
3. SUAS: A novel soft underwater artificial skin with capacitive transducers and hyperelastic membrane10.1017/S0263574718001315 ↗
4. De Pina Filho, A. (2007). Humanoid Robots: New Developments, IntechOpen.10.5772/39 ↗
5. From human to humanoid locomotion—An inverse optimal control approach10.1007/s10514-009-9170-7 ↗
6. Tactile sensing - from humans to humanoids10.1109/TRO.2009.2033627 ↗
7. Alfayad, S., Tayba, A.M., Ouezdou, F.B., and Namoun, F. (2016). Kinematic synthesis and modeling of a three degrees-of-freedom hybrid mechanism for shoulder and hip modules of humanoid robots. J. Mech. Robot., 8.10.1115/1.4033157 ↗
8. The gaits of bipedal and quadrupedal animals10.1177/027836498400300205 ↗
9. Steffan, E., Pal, S., and Das, T. (2020). Bio-inspired locomotion of circular robots with diametrically translating legs. J. Mech. Robot., 12.10.1115/1.4044738 ↗
10. Alexander, R. (1996). Optima for Animals, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691221601 ↗
11. Passive dynamic walking10.1177/027836499000900206 ↗
12. McGeer, T. (1993). Passive Dynamic Biped Catalogue, Experimental Robotics II. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences; Springer.
13. Legged robots at MIT: What’s new since Raibert?10.1109/100.876907 ↗
14. Righetti, L., and Ijspeert, A. (2006, January 15–19). Programmable central pattern generators: An application to biped locomotion control. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2006, Orlando, FL, USA.
15. Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: A review10.1016/j.neunet.2008.03.014 ↗
16. Zero-moment point - thirty five years of its life10.1142/S0219843604000083 ↗
17. Ogura, Y., Aikawa, H., Shimomura, K., Kondo, H., Morishima, A., Lim, H., and Takanishi, A. (2006, January 15–19). Development of a new humanoid robot WABIAN-2. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2006, Orlando, FL, USA.
18. Dynamic balance optimization in biped robots: Physical modeling, implementation and tests using an innovative formula10.1017/S0263574714001301 ↗
19. Muscolo, G.G., Caldwell, D., and Cannella, F. (2017). Calculation of the center of mass position of each link of multibody biped robots. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7070724 ↗
20. (2021, March 23). EMIEW 2-Hitachi’s Humanoid Robot, Really Cute and Clever. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Jb9oJY0Fe8.
21. Dynamics, B. (2021, March 23). Introducing Handle. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7xvqQeoA8c.
22. Flexible structure and wheeled feet to simplify biped locomotion of humanoid robots10.1142/S0219843616500304 ↗
23. Muscolo, G.G., Caldwell, D., and Cannella, F. (2017, January 19–22). Multibody dynamics of a flexible legged robot with wheeled feet. Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics, Prague, Czech Republic.
24. De Silva, C. (2007). Vibration Damping, Control, and Design, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420053227 ↗
25. Gakkai, D. (1960). Earthquake Resistant Design for Civil Engineering Structures, Earth Structures and Foundations in Japan, Japan Society of Civil Engineers.
26. Bachmann, H., and Ammann, W. (1987). Vibrations in Structures: Induced by Man and Machines, IABSE. Structural Engineering Documents, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.10.2749/sed003e ↗
27. Bastow, D., and Howard, G. (1993). Car Suspension and Handling, Pentech Press.
28. Fuchs, A., Nijman, E., and Priebsch, H. (2015). Automotive NVH Technology, Springer International Publishing. Springer Briefs in Applied Sciences and Technology.10.1007/978-3-319-24055-8 ↗
29. Ignazio, D., and Ferri, A. (2015). Active Control of Aircraft Cabin Noise, World Scientific Publishing Company. Computational and Experimental Methods in Structures.
30. Experimental direct spatial damping identification by the stabilised layers method10.1016/j.jsv.2018.08.055 ↗
31. Transient vibration control using nonlinear convergence active vibration absorber for impulse excitation10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.038 ↗
32. Cuvillon, L., Weber, X., and Gangloff, J. (2020). Modal Control for active vibration damping of cable-driven parallel robots. J. Mech. Robot., 12.10.1115/1.4046434 ↗
33. Design of passive damping systems10.1115/1.2838659 ↗
34. Using passive techniques for vibration damping in mechanical systems10.1590/S0100-73862000000300004 ↗
35. Biped robots with compliant joints for walking and running performance Growing10.3389/fmech.2020.00011 ↗
36. Compliant joints influence in four-legged robots10.3389/fmech.2020.00016 ↗
37. Frahm, H. (1911). Device for Damping Vibrations of Bodies. (Application No. 989,958), U.S. Patent.
38. Den Hartog, J. (2013). Mechanical Vibrations, Dover Civil and Mechanical Engineering; Dover Publications.
39. Rethinking the robotic rehabilitation pathway for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A need for clinical trials
40. Bonisoli, E. (Tutorial, 2021). LUPOS—LUmped Parameters Open Source FEM Code, Politecnico di Torino, Tutorial.
41. Maia, N., and Silva, J. (1997). Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis, Research Studies Press.
42. Géradin, M., and Rixen, D. (2015). Mechanical Vibrations—Theory and Application to Structural Dynamics, John Wiley & Sons.
43. Genta, G. (2008). Vibration Dynamics and Control, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-79580-5 ↗
44. The PolyMAX frequency-domain method: A new standard for modal parameter estimation?10.1155/2004/523692 ↗
45. Constrained maximum likelihood modal parameter identification applied to structural dynamics
46. Vacher, P., Jacquier, B., and Bucharles, A. (2010, January 20–22). Extensions of the MAC criterion to complex modes. Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA, Leuven, Belgium.
47. Robust pole placement in structures by the method of receptances10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.04.005 ↗
48. Lisitano, D., Jiffri, S., Bonisoli, E., and Mottershead, J.E. (2018). Experimental feedback linearisation of a non-smooth nonlinear system by the method of receptances. Math. Mech. Solids.10.1016/j.jsv.2017.11.047 ↗
49. Experimental nonlinear control for flutter suppression in a nonlinear aeroelastic system10.2514/1.G002519 ↗
50. Dal Borgo, M., Ghandchi Tehrani, M., and Elliott, S.J. (2020). Active nonlinear control of a stroke limited inertial actuator: Theory and experiment. J. Sound Vib., 465.10.1016/j.jsv.2019.115009 ↗
51. Local tuning and power requirements of a multi-input multi-output decentralised velocity feedback with inertial actuators10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.002 ↗
52. Optimum vibration absorbers for linear damped systems
53. A study of the non-linear dynamic response of spur gear using a multibody contact based model with flexible teeth10.1016/j.jsv.2019.01.019 ↗
54. Updating of finite element models for controlled multibody flexible systems through modal analysis10.1007/978-3-030-23132-3_32 ↗
55. Bosmans, J., Blockmans, B., Croes, J., Vermaut, M., and Desmet, W. (2019). 1D-3D nesting: Embedding reduced order flexible multibody models. Conference for Wind Power Drives, CWD Aachen.
56. Foss, K. (1956). Coordinates Which Uncouple the Equations of Motion of Damped Linear Dynamic Systems, Technical Report; Massachusetts Institute of Technology Aeroelastic and Structures Research Laboratory.10.21236/AD0093538 ↗
57. Experimental-numerical comparison of contact nonlinear dynamics through multi-level linear mode shapes