A Vehicle Guidance Model with a Close-to-Reality Driver Model and Different Levels of Vehicle Automation
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a microscopic vehicle guidance model which adapts to different levels of vehicle automation. Independent of the vehicle, the driver model built is different from the common microscopic simulation models that regard the driver and the vehicle as a unit. The term “Vehicle Guidance Model” covers, here, both the human driver as well as a combination of human driver and driver assistance system up to fully autonomously operated vehicles without a (human) driver. Therefore, the vehicle guidance model can be combined with different kinds of vehicle models. As a result, the combination of different types of driver (human/machine) and different types of vehicle (internal combustion engine/electric) can be simulated. Mainly two parts constitute the vehicle guidance model in this paper: the first part is a traditional microscopic car-following model adjusted according to different degrees of automation level. The adjusted model represents the automation level for the present and the near and the more distant future. The second part is a fuzzy control model that describes how humans adjust the pedal position when they want to reach a target speed with their vehicle. An experiment with 34 subjects was carried out with a driving simulator based on the experimental data and the fuzzy control strategy was determined. Finally, when comparing the simulated model data and actual driving data, it is found that the fuzzy model for the human driver can reproduce the behavior of human participants almost accurately.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Traffic and Road Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechatronics, University of Duisburg-Essen, 47058 Duisburg, Germany
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation10.1016/0191-2615(81)90037-0 ↗
2. Als, G. (1998). Microscopic Modeling of Traffic Flow. Investigation of Collision Free Vehicle Dynamics, Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V., Abt. Unternehmensorganisation und -Information.
3. Treiber, M., and Kesting, A. (2013). Traffic Flow Dynamics. Data, Models and Simulation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-32460-4 ↗
4. Traffic dynamics: Studies in car following10.1287/opre.6.2.165 ↗
5. An operational analysis of traffic dynamics10.1063/1.1721265 ↗
6. Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow10.1287/opre.9.4.545 ↗
7. Wiedemann, R. (2021, January 02). Simulation des Strassenverkehrsflusses. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view/596235.
8. A video-based approach to calibrating car-following parameters in VISSIM for urban traffic10.1016/j.ijtst.2016.06.001 ↗
9. Design and evaluation of a new intersection model to minimize congestions using VISSIM software10.1515/eng-2020-0019 ↗
10. Neuro fuzzy transmission control for automobile with variable loads10.1109/87.370709 ↗
11. Holve, R., Protzel, P., and Naab, K. (1996, January 19–22). Generating Fuzzy Rules for the Acceleration Control of an Adaptive Cruise Control System. Proceedings of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing, Berkeley, CA, USA.
12. ACC+ Stop&go maneuvers with throttle and brake fuzzy control10.1109/TITS.2006.874723 ↗
13. Pananurak, W., Thanok, S., and Parnichkun, M. (2009, January 22–25). Adaptive cruise control for an intelligent vehicle. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Bangkok, Thailand.10.1109/ROBIO.2009.4913274 ↗
14. Adaptive speed control method for electromagnetic direct drive vehicle robot driver based on fuzzy logic10.1177/0020294019866841 ↗
15. Maas, N., Benjamin, H., Martin, K., and Schramm, D. (2014, January 10–12). Simulator Setup According to Use Case Scenarios-A Human-Oriented Method for Virtual Development. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ASME 10th International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA), Senigallia, Italy.10.1109/MESA.2014.6935585 ↗
16. Maas, N. (2017). Konzeptionierung, Auslegung und Umsetzung von Assistenzfunktionen für die Übergabe der Fahraufgabe aus Hochautomatisiertem Fahrbetrieb. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universitätsbibliothek Duisburg-Essen].
17. Schweig, S., Liebherr, M., Schramm, D., Brand, M., and Mass, N. (2018, January 29–31). The impact of psychological and demographic parameters on simulator sickness. Proceedings of the SIMULTECH, Porto, Portugal.10.5220/0006837300910097 ↗
18. Lopez, P.A., Behrisch, M., Bieker-Walz, L., Erdmann, J., and Flötteröd, Y.-P. (2018, January 4–7). Microscopic traffic simulation using sumo. Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569938 ↗
19. Wagner, P. (2015). Steuerung und Management in Einem Verkehrssystem mit Autonomen Fahrzeugen; Autonomes Fahren, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-45854-9_15 ↗
20. Recent studies of simple reaction time10.1037/h0060900 ↗
21. Drivers’ brake reaction times10.1177/001872087101300104 ↗
22. Global bifurcation investigation of an optimal velocity traffic model with driver reaction time10.1103/PhysRevE.70.026207 ↗