journal article·2020-12-27Open access

Spectra-Based Selective Searching for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Chensong Yin, Chengshan Han, Xucheng Xue, Liang Huang

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

The research on hyperspectral anomaly detection algorithms has become a hotspot, driven by a lot of practical applications, such as mineral exploration, environmental monitoring and the national defense force. However, most existing hyperspectral anomaly detectors are designed with a single pixel as unit, which may not make full use of the spatial and spectral information in the hyperspectral image to detect anomalies. In this paper, to fully combine and utilize the spatial and spectral information of hyperspectral images, we propose a novel spectral-based selective searching method for hyperspectral anomaly detection, which firstly combines adjacent pixels with the same spectral characteristics into regions with adaptive shape and size and then treats those regions as one processing unit. Then, by fusing adjacent regions with similar spectral characteristics, the anomaly can be successfully distinguished from background. Two standard hyperspectral datasets are introduced to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. The detection performance is depicted by intuitive detection images, receiver operating characteristic curves and area under curve values. Comparing the results of the proposed method with five popular and state-of-the-art methods proves that the spectral-based selective searching method is an accurate and effective method to detect anomalies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Remote Sensing and Land Use · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Funding

the Key Project on National Defense Science and Technology Innovation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Borengasser, M., Hungate, W.S., and Watkins, R. (2008). Hyperspectral Remote Sensing—Principles and Applications, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420012606 ↗
2. Recent advances in techniques for hyperspectral image processing10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.028 ↗
3. Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges10.1109/MGRS.2013.2244672 ↗
4. Rasti, B., Scheunders, P., Ghamisi, P., Licciardi, G., and Chanussot, J. (2018). Noise reduction in hyperspectral imagery: Overview and application. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10030482 ↗
5. Hyperspectral target detection: An overview of current and future challenges10.1109/MSP.2013.2278992 ↗
6. Sparse and low-rank matrix decomposition for automatic target detection in hyperspectral imagery10.1109/TGRS.2019.2897635 ↗
7. Joint sparse representation and multitask learning for hyperspectral target detection10.1109/TGRS.2016.2616649 ↗
8. Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications10.1109/79.974724 ↗
9. Lorenz, S., Salehi, S., Kirsch, M., Zimmermann, R., Unger, G., Vest Sørensen, E., and Gloaguen, R. (2018). Radiometric correction and 3D integration of long-range ground-based hyperspectral imagery for mineral exploration of vertical outcrops. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10020176 ↗
10. Exploring structured sparsity by a reweighted Laplace prior for hyperspectral compressive sensing10.1109/TIP.2016.2598652 ↗
11. Hyperspectral anomaly detection via background and potential anomaly dictionaries construction10.1109/TGRS.2018.2872590 ↗
12. A tutorial overview of anomaly detection in hyperspectral images10.1109/MAES.2010.5546306 ↗
13. Training data assisted anomaly detection of multi-pixel targets in hyperspectral imagery10.1109/TSP.2020.2991311 ↗
14. Hyperspectral anomaly detection through spectral unmixing and dictionary-based low-rank decomposition10.1109/TGRS.2018.2818159 ↗
15. Structure tensor and guided filtering-based algorithm for hyperspectral anomaly detection10.1109/TGRS.2018.2890212 ↗
16. Hyperspectral anomaly detection by graph pixel selection10.1109/TCYB.2015.2497711 ↗
17. Hyperspectral anomaly detection using attribute profiles10.1109/LGRS.2017.2700329 ↗
18. Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution10.1109/29.60107 ↗
19. Analysis and optimizations of global and local versions of the RX algorithm for anomaly detection in hyperspectral data10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2238609 ↗
20. Multiple-window anomaly detection for hyperspectral imagery10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2239959 ↗
21. Zhao, L., Lin, W., Wang, Y., and Li, X. (2018). Recursive local summation of RX detection for hyperspectral image using sliding windows. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10010103 ↗
22. A locally adaptive background density estimator: An evolution for RX-based anomaly detector10.1109/LGRS.2013.2257670 ↗
23. Weighted-RXD and linear filter-based RXD: Improving background statistics estimation for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2302446 ↗
24. Improved estimation of local background covariance matrix for anomaly detection in hyperspectral images10.1117/1.3386069 ↗
25. Regularization for spectral matched filter and RX anomaly detector
26. Kernel RX-algorithm: A nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery10.1109/TGRS.2004.841487 ↗
27. A cluster-based approach for detecting man-made objects and changes in imagery10.1109/TGRS.2004.841481 ↗
28. Nonlinear joint fractional Fourier transform correlation for target detection in hyperspectral image10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.02.021 ↗
29. Hyperspectral anomaly detection by fractional Fourier entropy10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2940278 ↗
30. Ma, Y., Fan, G., Jin, Q., Huang, J., Mei, X., and Ma, J. (2020). Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection via Integration of Feature Extraction and Background Purification. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 1–5.
31. A discriminative metric learning based anomaly detection method10.1109/TGRS.2014.2303895 ↗
32. Random-selection-based anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery10.1109/TGRS.2010.2081677 ↗
33. A robust nonlinear hyperspectral anomaly detection approach10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2311995 ↗
34. Hyperspectral anomaly detection within the signal subspace10.1109/LGRS.2006.870833 ↗
35. Anomaly detection of hyperspectral imagery using modified collaborative representation10.1109/LGRS.2018.2796083 ↗
36. Sparse representation for target detection in hyperspectral imagery10.1109/JSTSP.2011.2113170 ↗
37. Hyperspectral anomaly detection by the use of background joint sparse representation10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2437073 ↗
38. Anomaly detection in hyperspectral images based on low-rank and sparse representation10.1109/TGRS.2015.2493201 ↗
39. Collaborative representation for hyperspectral anomaly detection10.1109/TGRS.2014.2343955 ↗
40. Tan, K., Hou, Z., Wu, F., Du, Q., and Chen, Y. (2019). Anomaly detection for hyperspectral imagery based on the regularized subspace method and collaborative representation. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11111318 ↗
41. Efficient Graph-Based Image Segmentation10.1023/B:VISI.0000022288.19776.77 ↗
42. Computer programs for hierarchical polythetic classification (“similarity analyses”)10.1093/comjnl/9.1.60 ↗
43. A mathematical theory of communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
44. Sweet, J.N. (2003, January 27–28). The spectral similarity scale and its application to the classification of hyperspectral remote sensing data. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, Greenbelt, MD, USA.
45. Van de Sande, K.E.A., Uijlings, J.R.R., Gevers, T., and Smeulders, A.W. (2011, January 6–13). Segmentation as selective search for object recognition. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126456 ↗
46. Selective search for object recognition10.1007/s11263-013-0620-5 ↗
47. Receiver operating characteristic curve confidence intervals and regions10.1109/LGRS.2008.915928 ↗
48. Ferri, C., Hernández-Orallo, J., and Flach, P. (July, January 28). A coherent interpretation of AUC as a measure of aggregated classification performance. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2011, Bellevue, WA, USA.