The Influence of Image Processing and Layer-to-Background Contrast on the Reliability of Flatbed Scanner-Based Characterisation of Additively Manufactured Layer Contours
Source abstract
Abstract
Flatbed scanners (FBSs) provide non-contact scanning capabilities that could be used for the on-machine verification of layer contours in additive manufacturing (AM) processes. Layer-wise contour deviation assessment could be critical for dimensional and geometrical quality improvement of AM parts, because it would allow for close-loop error compensation strategies. Nevertheless, contour characterisation feasibility faces many challenges, such as image distortion compensation or edge detection quality. The present work evaluates the influence of image processing and layer-to-background contrast characteristics upon contour reconstruction quality, under a metrological perspective. Considered factors include noise filtering, edge detection algorithms, and threshold levels, whereas the distance between the target layer and the background is used to generate different contrast scenarios. Completeness of contour reconstruction is evaluated by means of a coverage factor, whereas its accuracy is determined by comparison with a reference contour digitised in a coordinate measuring machine. Results show that a reliable contour characterisation can be achieved by means of a precise adjustment of image processing parameters under low layer-to-background contrast variability. Conversely, under anisotropic contrast conditions, the quality of contour reconstruction severely drops, and the compromise between coverage and accuracy becomes unbalanced. These findings indicate that FBS-based characterisation of AM layers will demand developing strategies that minimise the influence of anisotropy in layer-to-background contrast.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Construction and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Oviedo, 33203 Asturias, Spain
Funding
Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Basiliere, P., and Shanler, M. (2019). Hype Cycle for 3D Printing, Gartner Inc.
2. Wohlers, T. (2012). Wholers Report 2012—Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing State of the Industry, Wholers Associates. Annual Worldwide Progress Report.
3. Dimensional Accuracy Improvement of FDM Square Cross-Section Parts Using Artificial Neural Networks and an Optimization Algorithm10.1007/s00170-013-5196-2 ↗
4. Triangular mesh offset aiming to enhance Fused Deposition Modeling accuracy10.1007/s00170-015-6992-7 ↗
5. Making 3D Replicas Using a Flatbed Scanner and a 3D Printer. Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 201410.1007/978-3-319-09153-2_6 ↗
6. Capability of conoscopic holography for digitizing and measuring of layer thickness on PLA parts built by FFF10.1016/j.promfg.2019.07.038 ↗
7. A high-resolution and large field-of-view scanner for in-line characterization of powder bed defects during additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107562 ↗
8. Real–time prediction of penetration depths of laser surface melting based on coaxial visual monitoring10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106034 ↗
9. Methodology for the development of in-line optical surface measuring instruments with a case study for additive surface finishing10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.04.015 ↗
10. Determination of the size distribution and percentage of broken kernels of rice using flatbed scanning and image analysis10.1016/j.foodres.2003.09.001 ↗
11. A simple approach to fine wire diameter measurement using a high-resolution flatbed scanner10.1007/s00170-008-1405-9 ↗
12. Poliakow, E.V., Poliakov, V.V., Fedotova, L.A., and Tsvetkov, M.K. (2007). High.-Precision Measuring Scale Rulers for Flatbed Scanners, Heron Press Ltd.. Astronomy and Space Science.
13. Calibration of a flatbed scanner for traceable paper area measurement
14. Evaluation of resolution and periodic errors of a flatbed scanner used for digitizing spectroscopic photographic plates10.1364/AO.56.003744 ↗
15. Dimensional Measurement Variation of Scanned Objects Using Flatbed Scanners
16. A model to transform a commercial flatbed scanner into a two-coordinates measuring machine10.1016/j.measurement.2015.05.029 ↗
17. Development of an error compensation case study for 3D printers10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.145 ↗
18. Blanco, D., Fernandez, P., Noriega, A., Alvarez, B.J., and Valiño, G. (2020). Layer Contour Verification in Additive Manufacturing by Means of Commercial Flatbed Scanners. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20010001 ↗
19. Solomon, C., and Breckon, T. (2011). Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9780470689776 ↗
20. Jain, R., Kasturi, R., and Schunck, B.G. (1995). Machine Vision, McGraw-Hill, Inc.
21. Edge and line oriented Contour detection: State of the art10.1016/j.imavis.2010.08.009 ↗
22. An Overview of Contour Detection Approaches10.1007/s11633-018-1117-z ↗
23. A Review of Classic Edge Detectors10.5201/ipol.2015.35 ↗
24. Roberts, L.G. (1963). Machine Perception of Three-Dimensional Solids. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts. Institute of Technology].
25. Duda, R., and Hart, P. (1973). Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
26. Lipkin, B.S., and Rosenfeld, A. (1970). Object enhancement and extraction. Picture Processing and Psychopictorics, Academic Press.
27. Cuevas, E., Zaldivar, D., and Pérez, M. (2010). Procesamiento digital de imágenes con MatLAB y SIMULINK, Alfaomega & RA-MA.
28. Performance analysis of various filters for De-noising of Handwritten Kannada documents
29. Noises and Image Denoising Techniques: A Brief Survey
30. Comparison of various noise removals using bayesian framework
31. An Empirical Evaluation of Salt and Pepper Noise Removal for Document Images using Median Filter
32. The Mathworks Inc. (2020, March 01). MathWorks.com Online. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/edge.html.
33. Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E., and Eddins, S.L. (2009). Digital Image Processing Using Matlab®, Gatesmark Publishing. [2nd ed.].
34. Brischetto, S., Maggiore, P., and Ferro, C.G. (2017). Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Applications, MDPI AG.10.3390/technologies5030058 ↗