Reduction in Nitrogen Exports from Stormflow after Conversion of a Dry Detention Basin to a Stormwater Wetland
Source abstract
Abstract
Stormwater control measures such as dry detention basins and wetlands are often used to reduce the discharge of urban runoff and nutrients to streams, but differences in nutrient treatment may vary between practices. The goal of this study was to compare the nitrogen treatment efficiency of a dry detention basin before and after it was converted into a stormwater wetland. Inflow and outflow from a detention basin in Greenville, North Carolina was sampled during 13 storms and the stormwater wetland was sampled during 10 storms. Total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), NO3−, NH4+, chloride, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and physicochemical properties were evaluated. Inflow and outflow from the detention basin had identical median concentrations of TDN (0.47 mg L−1). The median TDN concentration for wetland outflow (0.18 mg L−1) was 63% lower relative to inflow (0.49 mg L−1). The hydraulic residence time of stormwater in the wetland was more than 10 times greater relative to the dry basin. There was a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in dissolved oxygen and oxidation reduction potential and an increase in median DOC concentrations in wetland outflow relative to inflow. Most of the reduction in TDN within the wetland was attributed to loss of NO3− (80% reduction), possibly due to denitrification. Conversion of dry detention basins to wetlands may provide significant benefits with regards to reducing TDN transport associated with urban runoff.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Urban Stormwater Management Solutions · Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment · Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Environmental Health Science Program, Department of Health Education & Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA
Funding
Sound Rivers
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2020, November 20). Impaired Waters and TMDLs, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/tmdl/impaired-waters-and-stormwater.
2. Luo, H., Guan, L., Jing, Z., He, B., Cao, X., Zhang, Z., and Tao, M. (2020). Performance Evaluation of Enhanced Bioretention Systems in Removing Dissolved Nutrients in Stormwater Runoff. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10093148 ↗
3. Best Management Practices for Nutrient and Sediment Retention in Urban Stormwater Runoff10.2134/jeq2006.0142 ↗
4. Sediment chemistry of urban stormwater ponds and controls on denitrification10.1002/ecs2.2318 ↗
5. Fronczyk, J., and Mumford, K.A. (2019). The Impact of Temperature on the Removal of Inorganic Contaminants Typical of Urban Stormwater. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9071273 ↗
6. Simultaneous removal of phosphate and ammonium nitrogen from agricultural runoff by amending soil in lakeside zone of Karst area, Southern China10.1016/j.agee.2019.106745 ↗
7. Controlling eutrophication: Nitrogen and phosphorus10.1126/science.1167755 ↗
8. Opportunities and challenges for managing nitrogen in urban stormwater: A review and synthesis10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.015 ↗
9. Al-Janabi, A.M.S., Ghazali, A.H., Yusuf, B., Sammen, S.S., Afan, H.A., Al-Ansari, N., Shahid, S., and Yaseen, Z.M. (2020). Optimizing Height and Spacing of Check Dam Systems for Better Grassed Channel Infiltration Capacity. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10113725 ↗
10. Effectiveness of dry ponds for stormwater total suspended solids removal10.1139/l02-008 ↗
11. Accretion of Nutrients and Sediment by a Constructed Stormwater Treatment Wetland in the Lake Tahoe Basin10.1111/1752-1688.12595 ↗
12. Hunt, W.F. (1999). Urban Waterways, Urban Stormwater Structural Best Management Practices (BMPs), North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Publication.
13. Processes and Drivers of Nitrogen Removal in Stormwater Biofiltration10.1080/10643389.2012.741310 ↗
14. Guerrero, J., Mahmoud, A., Alam, T., Chowdhury, M.A., Adetayo, A., Ernest, A., and Jones, K.D. (2020). Water Quality Improvement and Pollutant Removal by Two Regional Detention Facilities with Constructed Wetlands in South Texas. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12072844 ↗
15. Lenhart, H.A., Hunt, W.F., and Burchell, M.R. (2012). Harvestable Nitrogen Accumulation for Five Storm Water Wetland Plant Species: Trigger for Storm Water Control Measure Maintenance?. J. Environ. Eng., 972–978.10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000550 ↗
16. Stormwater control measure (SCM) maintenance considerations to ensure designed functionality10.1080/1573062X.2015.1111913 ↗
17. Morse, J.R., McPhillips, L.E., Shapleigh, J.P., and Walter, M.T. (2017). The Role of Denitrification in Stormwater Detention Basin Treatment of Nitrogen. Environ. Sci. Technol., 7928–7935.10.1021/acs.est.7b01813 ↗
18. Measuring and modeling ammonium adsorption by calcareous soils10.1007/s10661-012-2782-y ↗
19. Richardson, J.L., and Veprasksus, M.J. (2001). Redox Chemistry of Hydric Soils. Wetland Soils Genesis, Hydrology, Landscapes, and Classification, Lewis Publishers. [1st ed.].
20. Nitrogen and Carbon Dynamics beneath on-site wastewater treatment systems in Pitt County, North Carolina10.2166/wst.2013.765 ↗
21. Havlin, J.L., Beaton, J.D., Tisdale, S.L., and Nelson, W.L. (1999). Soil Fertility and Fertilizers, Prentice Hall. [6th ed.].
22. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (2020, November 15). Nutrient Practices and Crediting, Available online: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/nonpoint-source-management/nutrient-offset-information#approved-nutrient-reduction-practices.
23. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (2020, November 20). Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy, Available online: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/nonpoint-source-management/nutrient-strategies/tar-pamlico.
24. Hazen and Sawyer (2020, November 24). City of Greenville Greens Mill Run Watershed Master Plan, Available online: http://www.greenvillenc.gov/home/showdocument?id=13142.
25. (2020, November 24). North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Stormwater Calculations, Available online: https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Energy%20Mineral%20and%20Land%20Resources/Stormwater/BMP%20Manual/B%20%20Stormwater%20Calculations.pdf.
26. USGS National Water Information System: Web Interface (2020, November 15). USGS 02084000 Tar River at Greenville, NC, Available online: https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv?site_no=02084000.
27. Field Evaluation of Nitrogen Treatment by Conventional and Single-Pass Sand Filter Onsite Wastewater Systems in the North Carolina Piedmont10.1007/s11270-016-2958-0 ↗
28. Mitsch, W.J., and Gosselink, J.G. (2000). Wetlands, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. [3rd ed.].
29. In Situ Denitrification of Septic-System Nitrate Using Reactive Porous Media Barriers: Field Trials10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00266.x ↗
30. Nutrient and Escherichia coli Attenuation in a Constructed Stormwater Wetland in the North Carolina Coastal Plain
31. A review of whole-plant water use studies in trees10.1093/treephys/18.8-9.499 ↗
32. Merriman, L.S., and Hunt, W.F. (2014). Maintenance versus Maturation: Constructed Storm-Water Wetland’s Fifth-Year Water Quality and Hydrologic Assessment. J. Environ. Eng.10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000861 ↗
33. Long-tern hydraulic and treatment performance of a 19-year old constructed stormwater wetland- Finally matured or in need of maintenance?10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.031 ↗
34. Pollutant removal efficiency of a retrofitted stormwater detention pond10.2166/wqrjc.2013.020 ↗