Switched Control of Motor Assistance and Functional Electrical Stimulation for Biceps Curls
Source abstract
Abstract
Rehabilitation robotics is an emerging tool for motor recovery from various neurological impairments. However, balancing the human and robot contribution is an open problem. While the motor input can reduce fatigue, which is often a limiting factor of functional electrical stimulation (FES) exercises, too much assistance can slow progress. For a person with a neurological impairment, FES can assist by strategically contracting their muscle(s) to achieve a desired limb movement; however, feasibility can be limited due to factors such as subject comfort, muscle mass, unnatural muscle fiber recruitment, and stimulation saturation. Thus, motor assistance in addition to FES can be useful for prolonging exercise while still ensuring physical effort from the person. In this paper, FES is applied to the biceps brachii to perform biceps curls, and motor assistance is applied intermittently whenever the FES input reaches a pre-set comfort threshold. Exponential stability of the human–robot system is proven with a Lyapunov-like switched systems stability analysis. Experimental results from participants with neurological conditions demonstrate the feasibility and performance of the controller.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Funding
National Science Foundation · AFOSR
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke10.1001/archneur.1997.00550160075019 ↗
2. Robotic-Assisted Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb After Acute Stroke10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032 ↗
3. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper Extremities10.1007/BF02345116 ↗
4. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: New tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke
5. Robotic Technologies and Rehabilitation: New Tools for Stroke Patients Therapy10.1155/2013/153872 ↗
6. Effects of an intensive, task-specific rehabilitation program for individuals with chronic stroke: A case series10.3109/09638280903242716 ↗
7. Feasibility of intensive mobility training to improve gait, balance, and mobility in persons with chronic neurological conditions: A case series10.1097/NPT.0b013e31822a2a09 ↗
8. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy after Stroke10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70160-7 ↗
9. Rehabilitation robotics: Performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy10.1023/A:1024494031121 ↗
10. Cousin, C., Duenas, V.H., Rouse, C., and Dixon, W.E. (2018, January 27–29). Admittance Trajectory Tracking using a Challenge-Based Rehabilitation Robot with Functional Electrical Stimulation. Proceedings of the 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC), Milwaukee, WI, USA.10.23919/ACC.2018.8431750 ↗
11. Effects of Assist-As-Needed Upper Extremity Robotic Therapy after Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A parallel-Group Controlled Trial10.3389/fnbot.2017.00026 ↗
12. A Subject-Adaptive Controller for Wrist Robotic Rehabilitation10.1109/TMECH.2014.2340697 ↗
13. Adaptive training algorithm for robot-assisted upper-arm rehabilitation, applicable to individualised and therapeutic human–robot interaction10.1186/1743-0003-10-102 ↗
14. Minimal assist-as-needed controller for upper limb robotic rehabilitation10.1109/TRO.2015.2503726 ↗
15. Effects of electrical stimulation on muscle trophism in patients with hemophilic arthropathy10.1016/j.apmr.2009.05.017 ↗
16. Stimulation with low frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low-tens) increases motor function of the post-stroke paretic Arm10.1080/003655098444192 ↗
17. Comparison of robotics, functional electrical stimulation, and motor learning methods for treatment of persistent upper extremity dysfunction after stroke: A randomized controlled trial10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.022 ↗
18. Bobath or motor relearning program? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: A randomised controlled Study10.1191/0269215500cr338oa ↗
19. Rouse, C., Cousin, C., Duenas, V.H., and Dixon, W.E. (2017, January 12–15). Switched Motorized Assistance during Switched Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Biceps Brachii to Compensate for Fatigue. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Melbourne, Australia.10.1109/CDC.2017.8264554 ↗
20. Rouse, C., Cousin, C., Duenas, V.H., and Dixon, W.E. (October, January 30). Varying Motor Assistance During Biceps Curls Induced Via Functional Electrical Stimulation. Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.
21. A Switched Systems Approach Based on Changing Muscle Geometry of the Biceps Brachii During Functional Electrical Stimulation
22. Influence of Elbow Flexion and Stimulation Site on Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of the Biceps Brachii10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2807762 ↗
23. Nonlinear Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Tracking Control of a Human Limb10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2023294 ↗
24. Online identification and nonlinear control of the electrically stimulated quadriceps muscle10.1016/j.conengprac.2004.10.006 ↗
25. The Relationship Between Electrical Stimulus and Joint Torque: A Dynamic Model10.1109/86.867876 ↗
26. LaSalle-Yoshizawa Corollaries for Nonsmooth Systems10.1109/TAC.2013.2246900 ↗
27. A calculus for computing Filippov’s differential inclusion with application to the variable structure control of robot manipulators10.1109/TCS.1987.1086038 ↗
28. Liberzon, D. (2003). Switching in Systems and Control, Birkhauser.10.1007/978-1-4612-0017-8 ↗
29. The Time-Varying Nature of Electromechanical Delay and Muscle Control Effectiveness in Response to Stimulation-Induced Fatigue10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2626471 ↗
30. Allen, B., Cousin, C., Rouse, C., and Dixon, W.E. (2019, January 8–11). Cadence Tracking For Switched FES-Cycling with Unknown Time-Varying Input Delay. Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control (DSC) Conference, Park City, UT, USA.10.1109/CDC40024.2019.9029696 ↗