journal article·2020-07-13Open access

Influence of Three Dental Implant Surfaces on Cell Viability and Bone Behavior. An In Vitro and a Histometric Study in a Rabbit Model

María Rizo-Gorrita, Ignacio Fernandez-Asian, Andreina Garcia-de-Frenza, Celia Vazquez-Pachon, Maria-Angeles Serrera-Figallo, Daniel Torres-Lagares, Jose-Luis Gutierrez-Perez

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 14

Abstract

The chemical composition and the surface characteristics of dental implants are factors that have a decisive effect on the osseointegration process. The surface characterization at the compositional and topographic level of three dental implants available in the market was performed with different surface treatments: (1) sandblasted and acid etched surface (SLA), (2) hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) blasted surface (HA/TCP), and (3) HA-blasted and non-etching acid washed surface (HA + AW). In addition, an in vitro viability study of MG-63 osteoblast cells was performed with a JC-1 test. To complete the study, an in vivo study was conducted in New Zealand rabbits. The study analyzed the histometric characteristics of the bone formed around the implants at the level of area, volume, bone density, accumulated bone density, and bone–implant contact (BIC). The rabbits were sacrificed at 6 weeks after implants were placed in the tibial metaphysis. No statistically significant differences were observed at the level of cell viability or histometric parameters between the different study groups (p > 0.05). SLA and HA/TCP surfaces were the ones that obtained a higher BIC value. Taking into account the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the different implant surfaces analyzed favor a good bone response.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Oral Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seville University, Calle de Avicena s/n 41009 Seville, Spain

Funding

Ziacom Medical SLU ® (Madrid, Spain)

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces10.1111/cid.12742 ↗
2. Identification of Surface Characteristics Created by Miniature Machining of Dental Implants Made of Titanium Based Materials10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.175 ↗
3. Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52 ↗
4. Mechanical properties, surface morphology and stability of a modified commercially pure high strength titanium alloy for dental implants10.1016/j.dental.2014.10.002 ↗
5. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: Current knowledge and open questions10.1111/prd.12179 ↗
6. The Effect of Titanium Surface Modifications on Dental Implant Osseointegration10.1159/000381694 ↗
7. Surface modifications of dental implants10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00038.x ↗
8. Dental Implant Surface Modifications: A Review
9. Surface Modifications and Their Effects on Titanium Dental Implants10.1155/2015/791725 ↗
10. Resnik, R. (2020). Chapter 9: Dental Implant Surfaces. Misch’s Contemporary Implant Dentistry, Elsevier. [4th ed.].
11. Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.171 ↗
12. Comparative investigation of the surface properties of commercial titanium dental implants. Part I: Chemical composition10.1023/A:1015170625506 ↗
13. Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration10.1155/2016/6285620 ↗
14. Implant Surface Modifications: A Review
15. Red blood cell and platelet interactions with titanium implant surfaces10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006530.x ↗
16. Tissue response and wound healing after placement of two types of bioengineered grafts containing vital cells in submucosal maxillary pouches: An experimental pilot study in rabbits
17. Pre-prostheticuseofpoly (lactic–co–glycolicacid) membranes treated with oxygen plasma and TiO2 nanocomposite particles for guided bone regeneration processes10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.015 ↗
18. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro–computed tomography10.1002/jbmr.141 ↗
19. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Säge-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x ↗
20. Torres-Lagares, D., Castellanos-Cosano, L., Serrera-Figallo, M.Á., García-García, F.J., López-Santos, C., Barranco, A., Rodríguez-Gonzalez Elipe, A., Rivera-Jiménez, C., and Gutiérrez-Pérez, J.L. (2017). In Vitro and in Vivo Study of Poly (Lactic⁻co⁻Glycolic) (PLGA) Membranes Treated with Oxygen Plasma and Coated with Nanostructured Hydroxyapatite Ultrathin Films for Guided Bone Regeneration Processes. Polymers, 9.10.3390/polym9090410 ↗
21. Comparison of bone-implant contact and bone-implant volume between 2D-histological sections and 3D-SRµCT slices10.22203/eCM.v023a18 ↗
22. The biocompatibility of SLA-treated titanium implants10.1088/1748-6041/3/2/025011 ↗
23. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01547.x ↗
24. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces10.1002/jbm.b.31264 ↗
25. Comparative study on the osseointegration of implants in dog mandibles according to the implant surface treatment10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.6.345 ↗
26. In vitro biological effects of titanium rough surface obtained by calcium phosphate grid blasting10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.033 ↗
27. Residual aluminum oxide on the surface of titanium implants has no effect on osseointegration10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00300-4 ↗
28. Positive Biomechanical Effects of Titanium Oxide for Sandblasting Implant Surface as an Alternative to Aluminium Oxide10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00019 ↗
29. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-6-.x ↗
30. Shafie, H.R. (2014). Abutment Preparation Techniques for One-Piece Titanium and Zirconia Implants. Clinical and Laboratory Manual of Dental Implant Abutments, Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118928547 ↗
31. Microscopic Study of Surface Microtopographic Characteristics of Dental Implants10.2174/1874210601610010139 ↗
32. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1–Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them
33. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01054.x ↗
34. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface10.1177/154405910408300704 ↗
35. Hydrocarbon Deposition Attenuates Osteoblast Activity on Titanium10.1177/0022034514536578 ↗
36. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes
37. The influence of surface treatment on the implant roughness pattern10.1590/S1678-77572012000500010 ↗
38. Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Rough Surfaces: A Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in an Adult Minipig Model10.1097/ID.0000000000000560 ↗
39. Comparison of Osseointegration of Five Different Surfaced Titanium Implants10.1097/SCS.0000000000004572 ↗
40. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: A study in dogs10.1902/jop.2010.100520 ↗
41. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and resorbable blasting media surfaces10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00105 ↗
42. Biomechanical and histomorphometric analysis of etched and non-etched resorbable blasting media processed implant surfaces: An experimental study in dogs10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.02.002 ↗
43. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on modified titanium surfaces10.1016/j.micron.2017.11.010 ↗
44. Influence of bone quality on the mechanical interaction between implant and bone: A finite element analysis10.1016/j.jdent.2019.06.008 ↗
45. Experimental evaluation in rabbits of the effects of thread concavities in bone formation with different titanium implant surfaces10.1111/cid.12033 ↗
46. Evaluation of the Sealing Capability of the Implant Healing Screw by Using Real Time Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis: Internal Hexagon Versus Cone Morse10.1902/jop.2016.160076 ↗