journal article·2020-05-14Open access

Improving Matrix Factorization Based Expert Recommendation for Manuscript Editing Services by Refining User Opinions with Binary Ratings

Yeonbin Son, Yerim Choi

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 10

Abstract

As language editing became an essential process for enhancing the quality of a research manuscript, there are several companies providing manuscript editing services. In such companies, a manuscript submitted for proofreading is matched with an editing expert through a manual process, which is costly and often subjective. The major drawback of the manual process is that it is almost impossible to consider the inherent characteristics of a manuscript such as writing style and paragraph composition. To this end, we propose an expert recommendation method for manuscript editing services based on matrix factorization, a well-known collaborative filtering approach for learning latent information in ordinal ratings given by users. Specifically, binary ratings are utilized to substitute ordinal ratings when negative opinions are expressed by users since negative opinions are more accurately expressed by binary ratings than ordinal ratings. From the experiments using a real-world dataset, the proposed method outperformed the rest of the compared methods with an RMSE (root mean squared error) of 0.1. Moreover, the effectiveness of substituting ordinal ratings with binary ratings was validated by conducting sentiment analysis on text reviews.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recommender Systems and Techniques · Topic Modeling · Expert finding and Q&A systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Kyonggi University, 154-42 Gwanggyosan-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si 16227, Korea

Funding

Kyonggi University

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Can Literary Style Be Translated?10.1075/babel.52.3.04shi ↗
2. (2020, February 10). Professional Proofreading & Editing. Available online: http://essayreview.co.kr.
3. (2020, February 10). Academic English Editing and Manuscript Proofreading. Available online: http://www.enago.co.kr.
4. (2020, February 10). Professional English and Academic Editing Service by Experts. Available online: http://www.editage.co.kr.
5. Recommender Systems10.1145/245108.245121 ↗
6. Modern Information Retrieval: A Brief Overview
7. Maximum-Margin Matrix Factorization
8. Bobadilla, J., Alonso, S., and Hernando, A. (2020). Deep Learning Architecture for Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072441 ↗
9. Tag-Aware Dynamic Music Recommendation10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.014 ↗
10. Location-Aware Service Recommendation with Enhanced Probabilistic Matrix Factorization10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877137 ↗
11. Koren, Y. (2009). Collaborative Filtering with Temporal Dynamics. Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM Press.10.1145/1557019.1557072 ↗
12. Salakhutdinov, R., and Mnih, A. (2007). Probabilistic Matrix Factorization. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press.
13. Yuan, Y., Zahir, A., and Yang, J. (2019). Modeling Implicit Trust in Matrix Factorization-Based Collaborative Filtering. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9204378 ↗
14. Exploiting Matrix Factorization to Asymmetric User Similarities in Recommendation Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2015.03.006 ↗
15. Ma, H., King, I., and Lyu, M.R. (2007). Effective Missing Data Prediction for Collaborative Filtering. Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ACM Press.10.1145/1277741.1277751 ↗
16. Hybrid Collaborative Filtering for High-Involvement Products: A Solution to Opinion Sparsity and Dynamics10.1016/j.dss.2015.09.002 ↗
17. Chu, P.M., Mao, Y.S., Lee, S.J., and Hou, C.L. (2020). Leveraging User Comments for Recommendation in E-Commerce. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072540 ↗
18. GeoMF++: Scalable Location Recommendation via Joint Geographical Modeling and Matrix Factorization10.1145/3182166 ↗
19. Hu, K., Gui, Z., Cheng, X., Qi, K., Zheng, J., You, L., and Wu, H. (2016). Content-Based Discovery for Web Map Service Using Support Vector Machine and User Relevance Feedback. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0166098 ↗
20. Jin, X., Wang, C., Luo, J., Yu, X., and Han, J. (2011). LikeMiner: A System for Mining the Power of ‘Like’ in Social Media Networks. Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM Press.10.1145/2020408.2020528 ↗
21. Yang, S.H., Long, B., Smola, A., Sadagopan, N., Zheng, Z., and Zha, H. (2011). Like Like Alike: Joint Friendship and Interest Propagation in Social Networks. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, ACM Press.10.1145/1963405.1963481 ↗
22. Mixed Factorization for Collaborative Recommendation with Heterogeneous Explicit Feedbacks10.1016/j.ins.2015.10.044 ↗
23. Pan, W., Liu, N.N., Xiang, E.W., and Yang, Q. (2011). Transfer Learning to Predict Missing Ratings via Heterogeneous User Feedbacks. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press.
24. Transfer learning in Heterogeneous Collaborative Filtering Domains10.1016/j.artint.2013.01.003 ↗
25. Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems10.1109/MC.2009.263 ↗
26. He, X., Zhang, H., Kan, M.Y., and Chua, T.S. (2016). Fast Matrix Factorization for Online Recommendation with Implicit Feedback. Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ACM Press.10.1145/2911451.2911489 ↗
27. Techniques and Applications for Sentiment Analysis10.1145/2436256.2436274 ↗
28. Deformable Convolutional Matrix Factorization for Document Context-Aware Recommendation in Social Networks10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2917257 ↗
29. An Efficient Non-Negative Matrix-Factorization-Based Approach to Collaborative Filtering for Recommender Systems10.1109/TII.2014.2308433 ↗
30. Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis10.1162/COLI_a_00049 ↗
31. (2020, February 10). Khaiii. Available online: https://github.com/kakao/khaiii.
32. KOSAC: Korean Sentiment Analysis Corpus
33. Robustness of Neuroprosthetic Decoding Algorithms10.1007/s00422-002-0374-6 ↗