A Study on Shock Absorption Characteristics of Honeycomb-Inserted Bollards
Source abstract
Abstract
Lack of shock absorption capability of conventional steel bollards causes significant vehicle damage and, consequently, high repair costs. This research studies a solution to reduce vehicle damage by inserting polylactic acid (PLA) honeycomb structures. A honeycomb-inserted bollard was designed based on numerical simulations using LS-DYNA, which yielded the bollard designed for actual vehicle-bollard collision experiments. Simulation efforts were focused on calculating the acceleration characteristics when a vehicle collides with steel and honeycomb-inserted bollards. Compared to the simulated steel bollards, 20 MPa yield-strength honeycomb-inserted bollard showed 0.017 s delay in the maximum acceleration occurrence time, reduction of the maximum acceleration of 37.4% of that of steel bollards, and a 13.1% reduction in the B-pillar maximum acceleration. Actual vehicle-bollard collision experiments, with a gyro-sensor installed at the test vehicle front bumper frame, also proved improved shock absorption characteristics of the honeycomb-inserted bollards. An experiment with honeycomb-inserted bollard showed a 0.783 s delay in the maximum acceleration occurrence time, a significant delay when compared to steel bollards. The maximum acceleration measured by the gyro-sensor was 0.35 × 103 m/s2 when the simulation predicted it to be 0.388 × 103 m/s2, proving the similarity in the simulations and experiments. Thus, this study of shock absorption characteristics promised reduced damage to vehicles and lower repair cost.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea
Accenture, 100 Peachtree St. Floor 13, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
School of Mechanical Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea
Funding
Ministry of SMEs and Startups
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. A Study on Shock Absorption Bollard using Honeycomb Geometry
2. Performance Evaluation and Proposal on Standard Establishment of the Bollard through Impact Analysis10.9712/KASS.2016.16.4.059 ↗
3. A Study on the Implementation of the Auditory Map for Blind People
4. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2019). Act on Promotion of the Transportation Convenience of Mobility Disadvantaged Persons, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
5. Test and numerical simulation of truck collision with anti-ram bollards10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.07.011 ↗
6. National Counterterrorism Center (2011). 2010 NCTC Report on Terrorism, National Counterterrorism Center.
7. Damageability, Repairability and Safety of Automobile at Low Speed Frontal and Rear Crash Test
8. Deptula, L., and Noah, A. (2020, March 30). Assessing the Costs & Benefits of Effective Lightweighting Technologies. Available online: http://www.cargroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Assessing-the-Costs-Benefits-of-Effective-Lightweighting-Technologies.pdf.
9. Mun, N. (2019). Activation of Automotive Replacement Auto-Parts. Auto J., 44–46. Available online: https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j1555_201910/.
10. (2020, March 30). Recommended Practice for Optimizing Automobile Damageability and Repairability. Available online: https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j1555_201910/.
11. Effect of Bead Shape in Aluminum Crash Box for Effective Impact Energy Absorption Under Low-Velocity Impact Condition10.3795/KSME-A.2012.36.10.1155 ↗
12. In-plane crashworthiness of bio-inspired hierarchical honeycombs10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.050 ↗
13. Influence of reinforcement in the honeycomb structures under axial compressive load10.1016/j.tws.2017.06.010 ↗
14. Prediction of crushing behaviour of honeycomb structures10.1533/ijcr.2003.0227 ↗
15. A novel re-entrant auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane impact resistance10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.024 ↗
16. Prediction to shock absorption energy of an aluminum honeycomb
17. Prediction of Crushing Response for Metal Hexagonal Honeycomb under Quasi-Static Loading
18. Gibson, L.J., and Ashby, M.F. (1997). Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press. [2nd ed.].10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
19. Aluminum honeycomb sandwich for protective structures of earth moving machines10.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.034 ↗
20. Quasi-static response of laterally simple compressed hexagonal rings
21. Lee, J.-H., Kim, J.-S., Lee, S.-J., and Cheon, S.-K. (2006). A Study on the Impact Characteristics of honeycomb Sandwich Panels for the Hybrid Composite Train Bodyshell. Korean Soc. Mech. Eng., 2635–2639.
22. Experimental and numerical investigation on 3D printed PLA sacrificial honeycomb cladding10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.013 ↗
23. Design Analysis of Hybrid Composite Anti-ram Bollard Subjected to Impulsive Loadings10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.093 ↗
24. Defects in Extrusion Process and Their Impact on Product Quality
25. NIIR Board of Consultants & Engineers (2017). The Complete Technology Book on Plastic Extrusion, Moulding and Mould Designs, NIIR.
26. Du Bois, J.H., and Du Bois, P. (2018, January 10–12). A Study in Mass Scaling for Sheet Metal Forming with LS-DYNA. Proceedings of the 15th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Detroit, MI, USA.
27. Heimbs, S. (2008, January 22–24). Virtual testing of sandwich core structures with LS-Dyna. Proceedings of the 26th CADFEM Users’ Meeting, Darmstadt, Germany.
28. Simulation Analysis of Car Front Collision Based on LS-DYNA and Hyper Works