Haptic Hybrid Prototyping (HHP): An AR Application for Texture Evaluation with Semantic Content in Product Design
Source abstract
Abstract
The manufacture of prototypes is costly in economic and temporal terms and in order to carry this out it is necessary to accept certain deviations with respect to the final finishes. This article proposes haptic hybrid prototyping, a haptic-visual product prototyping method created to help product design teams evaluate and select semantic information conveyed between product and user through texturing and ribs of a product in early stages of conceptualization. For the evaluation of this tool, an experiment was realized in which the haptic experience was compared during the interaction with final products and through the HHP. As a result, it was observed that the answers of the interviewees coincided in both situations in 81% of the cases. It was concluded that the HHP enables us to know the semantic information transmitted through haptic-visual means between product and user as well as being able to quantify the clarity with which this information is transmitted. Therefore, this new tool makes it possible to reduce the manufacturing lead time of prototypes as well as the conceptualization phase of the product, providing information on the future success of the product in the market and its economic return.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Color perception and design · Design Education and Practice · Multisensory perception and integration
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering & Industrial Design, Faculty of Engineering, University of Cádiz, Av. Universidad de Cádiz 10, Puerto Real, E-11519 Cádiz, Spain
Department of Design Engineering, University of Seville, Virgen de África 7, 41011 Seville, Spain
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Nafisi, M., Wiktorsson, M., Rösiö, C., and Granlund, A. (2019). Manufacturing engineering requirements in the early stages of new product development—A case study in two assembly plants. Advanced Applications in Manufacturing Enginering, Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-08-102414-0.00005-7 ↗
2. Digitalización de alimentos frescos mediante escaneado 3d para el diseño de envases personalizados
3. Gilchrist, A. (2016). Introducing Industry 4.0. Industry 4.0, Apress.10.1007/978-1-4842-2047-4_13 ↗
4. Scanning the industry 4.0: A literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems
5. Internet of Things (IoT): A review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.017 ↗
6. User-centred design for developing e-Health system for renal patients at home (AppNephro)10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.007 ↗
7. The same person is never the same: Introducing mood-stimulated thought/action tendencies for user-centered design10.1016/j.sheji.2019.07.001 ↗
8. The influence of product aesthetics on consumer inference making
9. A semantic discontinuity detection (SDD) method for comparing designers’ product expressions with users’ product impressions10.1016/j.destud.2019.02.002 ↗
10. Krippendorff, K. (2006). The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design, CRC/Taylor & Francis.10.1201/9780203299951 ↗
11. Framework of product experience
12. Norman, D.A. (2005). El Diseño Emocional: Por Qué nos Gustan (o no) los Objetos Cotidianos, Paidós.
13. Shannon, C.E., and Weaver, W. (1964). The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press.
14. Monó, R. (1997). Design for Product Understanding: The Aesthetics of Design from a Semiotic Approach, Liber AB.
15. Design as communication: Exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation10.1016/j.destud.2008.05.002 ↗
16. Demet, P. (2018, November 19). Getting Emotional With Pieter Desmet|Design & Emotion. Available online: http://www.design-emotion.com/2006/11/05/getting-emotional-with-dr-pieter-desmet/.
17. Norman, D.A., Berkrot, P., and Tantor Media (2011). The Design of Everyday Things, Tantor Media, Inc.
18. Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001 ↗
19. Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response10.1177/002224299505900302 ↗
20. Propositions of human-centeredness; A philosophy for design
21. Applications of affordance and semantics in product design10.1016/j.destud.2006.07.002 ↗
22. Chang, K.-H., and Chang, K.-H. (2015). Rapid prototyping. e-Design, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-382038-9.00014-4 ↗
23. Um, D. (2018). Solid Modeling and Applications: Rapid Prototyping, CAD and CAE Theory, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-319-74594-7_7 ↗
24. Bruno, F., Angilica, A., Cosco, F., Luchi, M.L., and Muzzupappa, M. (2011, January 15–17). Mixed prototyping environment with different video tracking techniques. Proceedings of the IMProVe 2011 International Conference on Innovative Methods in Product Design, Venice, Italy.
25. SHPbench—A smart hybrid prototyping based environment for early testing, verification and (user based) validation of advanced driver assistant systems of cars10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.025 ↗
26. Emotional activity in early immersive design: Sketches and moodboards in virtual reality10.1016/j.destud.2016.11.001 ↗
27. Accelerating product prototyping through hybrid methods: Coupling 3D printing and LEGO10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.003 ↗
28. Stark, R., Beckmann-Dobrev, B., Schulze, E.-E., Adenauer, J., and Israel, J.H. (2009, January 7–9). Smart hybrid prototyping zur multimodalen erlebbarkeit virtueller prototypen innerhalb der produktentstehung. Proceedings of the Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme BWMMS’09: Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt Technischer Systeme, Berlin, Germany.
29. Conceptual design using functional 3D models in augmented reality10.1007/s12008-014-0207-6 ↗
30. Realizing virtual reality learning environment for industry 4.010.1016/j.procir.2019.02.025 ↗
31. A enhanced interaction framework based on VR, AR and MR in digital twin10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.103 ↗
32. Analysis of car door closing sound quality10.1016/j.apacoust.2006.09.004 ↗
33. The use of semantic differential scales in listening tests: A comparison between context and laboratory test conditions for the rolling sounds of office chairs10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.06.016 ↗
34. “Dior, J’adore”: The role of contextual information of luxury on emotional responses to perfumes10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.12.003 ↗
35. Da Silva, E.S.A. (2016). Design, Technologie et Perception: Mise en Relation du Design Sensoriel, Sémantique et Émotionnel avec la Texture et les Matériaux. [Ph.D. Thesis, ENSAM].
36. Fenko, A.G., Schifferstein, H.N.J., and Hekkert, P.P.M. (2008, January 16–19). Which senses dominate at different stages of product experience?. Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference, Sheffield, UK.
37. Fenko, A. (2019). Influencing healthy food choice through multisensory packaging design. Multisensory Packaging, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-94977-2_9 ↗
38. Fenko, A.B. (2010). Sensory Dominance in Product Experience, VSSD.
39. Lee, W., and Park, J. (2005, January 5–8). Augmented foam: A tangible augmented reality for product design. Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR’05), Vienna, Austria.
40. Hybrid simulators for product service-systems—Innovation potential demonstrated on urban bike mobility10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.049 ↗
41. VPModel: High-fidelity product simulation in a virtual-physical environment10.1109/TVCG.2019.2932276 ↗
42. Rodríguez-Parada, L., Mayuet, P.F., and Gamez, A.J. (2019, January 19—21). Industrial product design: Study of FDM technology for the manufacture of thermoformed prototypes. Proceedings of the Manufacturing Engineering Society International Conference (MESIC2019), Madrid, Spain.
43. A case study of phantom omni force feedback device for virtual product design10.1007/s12008-015-0274-3 ↗
44. Evaluating users’ emotions for kansei-based Malaysia higher learning institution website using kansei checklist10.11591/eei.v8i1.1448 ↗
45. Influence of packaging attributes on consumer evaluation of fresh cod10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.015 ↗
46. Emotions associated with different textures during touch10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.012 ↗
47. Seeing through touch: A conceptual framework of visual-tactile interplay10.1108/JPBM-07-2017-1520 ↗
48. Optimal visual–haptic integration with articulated tools10.1007/s00221-017-4896-5 ↗
49. Emotion telepresence: Emotion augmentation through affective haptics and visual stimuli10.1088/1742-6596/352/1/012045 ↗
50. Designing visual recognition for the brand10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00696.x ↗
51. Karjalainen, T.-M. (2004). Semantic Transformation in Design: Communicating Strategic Brand Identity through Product Design References, University of Art and Design in Helsinki.
52. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction
53. Stark, R. (2019, July 16). Fraunhofer IPK: Smart Hybrid Prototyping. Available online: https://www.ipk.fraunhofer.de/en/divisions/virtual-product-creation/technologies-and-industrial-applications/smart-hybrid-prototyping/.
54. (2019, October 19). Microsoft HoloLens Commercial Suite. Available online: https://www.microsoft.com/es-es/p/microsoft-hololens-commercial-suite/944xgcf64z5b?activetab=pivot:techspecstab.
55. Farooq, A., Evreinov, G., and Raisamo, R. (2019, January 24–28). Enhancing Multimodal Interaction for Virtual Reality Using Haptic Mediation Technology. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Washington, DC, USA.10.1007/978-3-030-20476-1_38 ↗
56. Krippendorff, K., and Butter, R. (1984). Product Semantics: Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form, ASC. Departmental Papers.
57. Gibson, J.J. (1974). The Perception of the Visual World, Greenwood Press.
58. The senses considered as perceptual systems10.2307/3331482 ↗
59. Karjalainen, T.-M. (2005, January 29–31). Semantic mapping of design processes. In Proceeding of the 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Bremen, Germany.