journal article·2019-11-06Open access

An Accident Model with Considering Physical Processes for Indoor Environment Safety

Zhengguo Yang, Yuto Lim, Yasuo Tan

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 22

Abstract

Accident models provide a conceptual representation of accident causation. They have been applied to environments that have been exposed to poisonous or dangerous substances that are hazardous in nature. The home environment refers to the indoor space with respect to the physical processes the of indoor climate, e.g., temperature change, which are not hazardous in general. However, it can be hazardous when the physical process is in some states, e.g., a state of temperature that can cause heat stroke. If directly applying accident models in such a case, the physical processes are missing. To overcome this problem, this paper proposes an accident model by extending the state-of-the-art accident model, i.e., Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Process (STAMP) with considering physical processes. Then, to identify causes of abnormal system behaviors that result in physical process anomalies, a hazard analysis technique called System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is tailored and applied to a smart home system for indoor temperature adjustment. The analytical results are documented by a proposed landscape genealogical layout documentation. A comparison with results by applying the original STPA was made, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the tailored STPA to apply in identifying causes in our case.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Occupational Health and Safety Research · Risk and Safety Analysis · Safety Warnings and Signage

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi, Ishikawa 923-1292, Japan

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Underwood, P., and Waterson, P. (2013). Accident Analysis Models and Methods: Guidance for Safety Professionals, Loughborough University.
2. Leveson, N.G. (2011). Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety, The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8179.001.0001 ↗
3. Hollnagel, E. (2012). FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-technical Systems, CRC Press. [1st ed.].
4. STAMP-based analysis of deepwater well control safety10.1016/j.jlp.2018.05.019 ↗
5. STAMP-based analysis on the railway accident and accident spreading: Taking the China—Jiaoji railway accident for example10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.002 ↗
6. Systems Theoretic Accident Model and Process (STAMP) safety modelling applied to an aircraft rapid decompression event10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.011 ↗
7. STAMP-based causal analysis of China-Donghuang oil transportation pipeline leakage and explosion accident10.1016/j.jlp.2018.10.001 ↗
8. Daisuke, U. (2016). STAMP Applied to Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster and the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants in Japan. [Master’s Thesis, School of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
9. Leveson, N.G., and Thomas, J.P. (2018). STPA Handbook, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
10. Underwood, P., and Waterson, P. (2012). A critical review of the STAMP, FRAM and Accimap systemic accident analysis models. Advances in Human Aspects of Road and Rail Transportation, CRC Press.
11. Ericson, C.A. (2005). Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.. Chapter 3.10.1002/0471739421 ↗
12. Yang, Z., Lim, A.O., and Tan, Y. (2013, January 1–4). Event-based home safety problem detection under the CPS home safety architecture. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 2nd Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/GCCE.2013.6664899 ↗
13. Yang, Z., Lim, Y., and Tan, Y. (2017, January 24–27). A risk model for indoor environment safety. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 6th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), Nagoya, Japan.10.1109/GCCE.2017.8229306 ↗
14. Harper, R. (2003). Inside the Smart House, Springer.10.1007/b97527 ↗
15. Lobaccaro, G., Carlucci, S., and Löfström, E. (2016). A Review of Systems and Technologies for Smart Homes and Smart Grids. Energies, 9.10.3390/en9050348 ↗
16. Machine Learning for Smart Building Applications: Review and Taxonomy
17. Home automation networks: A survey10.1016/j.csi.2016.08.008 ↗
18. Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160 ↗
19. MIL-STD-882E (2012). Department of Defense Standard Practice: System Safety.
20. Defence Standard 00-56 (2007). Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems, Part 1, Requirements.
21. Chemishkian, S. (2002, January 15–16). Building smart services for smart home. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 4th International Workshop on Networked Appliances (Cat. No.02EX525), Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
22. Constructing Home Network Systems and Integrated Services Using Legacy Home Appliances and Web Services10.4018/jwsr.2008010105 ↗
23. Yang, Z., Aoki, T., and Tan, Y. (2018, January 15–17). Multiple Conformance to Hybrid Automata for Checking Smart House Temperature Change. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM 22nd International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT), Madrid, Spain.10.1109/DISTRA.2018.8601005 ↗
24. Methods to Calculate the Heat Index as an Exposure Metric in Environmental Health Research10.1289/ehp.1206273 ↗
25. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2010 (2010). Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, Standard, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
26. Woods, D.D., Hollnagel, E., and Leveson, N. (2006). Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts, CRC Press. [1st ed.].
27. Jacklitsch, B., Williams, W.J., Musolin, K., Coca, A., Kim, J.H., and Turner, N. (2016). NIOSH Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Heat and Hot Environments.
28. ISO 11079 (2007). Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment—Determination and Interpretation of Cold Stress When Using Required Clothing Insulation (IREQ) and Local Cooling Effects, Standard, International Organization for Standardization.
29. The effect of high indoor temperatures on self-perceived health of elderly persons10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.012 ↗
30. Effects of thermal environment on sleep and circadian rhythm10.1186/1880-6805-31-14 ↗
31. Leon, L.R., and Bouchama, A. (2015). Heat Stroke. Comprehensive Physiology, American Cancer Society.10.1002/cphy.c140017 ↗
32. Cooling Methods in Heat Stroke10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.09.014 ↗
33. Wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT)—Its history and its limitations10.1016/j.jsams.2007.07.003 ↗
34. Systems-Based Accident Analysis in the Led Outdoor Activity Domain: Application and Evaluation of a Risk Management Framework10.1080/00140139.2010.489966 ↗
35. Graphic representation of accident scenarios: Mapping system structure and the causation of accidents10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00036-9 ↗
36. Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0 ↗
37. Uncertainty treatment in risk analysis of complex systems: The cases of STAMP and FRAM10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.004 ↗
38. Interdisciplinary safety analysis of complex socio-technological systems based on the functional resonance accident model: An application to railway traffic supervision10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.006 ↗
39. FRAMA: A safety assessment approach based on Functional Resonance Analysis Method10.1016/j.ssci.2016.01.002 ↗
40. A Monte Carlo evolution of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to assess performance variability in complex systems10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.016 ↗
41. Systems-based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.009 ↗
42. Four studies, two methods, one accident—An examination of the reliability and validity of Accimap and STAMP for accident analysis10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.002 ↗
43. Yang, L., Yang, S.H., and Yao, F. (2006, January 8–11). Safety and Security of Remote Monitoring and Control of intelligent Home Environments. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/ICSMC.2006.384555 ↗
44. RFID-based Indoor Location Tracking to Ensure the Safety of the Elderly in Smart Home Environments10.1007/s00779-012-0604-4 ↗
45. Lee, K.H., and Seo, C.J. (2010, January 27–30). Development of user-friendly intelligent home robot focused on safety and security. Proceedings of the ICCAS 2010, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.10.1109/ICCAS.2010.5669807 ↗
46. Yared, R., Abdulrazak, B., Tessier, T., and Mabilleau, P. (2015). Cooking Risk Analysis to Enhance Safety of Elderly People in Smart Kitchen. Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, ACM.10.1145/2769493.2769516 ↗
47. Hasan, T., Nayan, M.F., Iqbal, M.A., and Islam, M. (2012, January 28–30). Smart Solar Home System with Safety Device Low Voltage Alert. Proceedings of the 2012 UKSim 14th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation, Cambridge, UK.10.1109/UKSim.2012.36 ↗
48. Doan, T.T., Safavi-Naini, R., Li, S., Avizheh, S., Kumaramangalam, M.V., and Fong, P.W.L. (2018, January 20–20). Towards a Resilient Smart Home. Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on IoT Security and Privacy, Budapest, Hungary.10.1145/3229565.3229570 ↗