Simulation of dynamic brittle and quasi-brittle fracture: a revisited local damage approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Dynamic fracture deals with the degradation and failure of materials and structures under conditions where the inertia effect must be included in the analysis. In this contribution, a dynamic description of a simple local damage approach and its detailed finite element implementation is presented towards brittle and quasi-brittle localization failure under time-dependent loading conditions. To eliminate the issue of the mesh-dependence, the softening parameter of the introduced model is controlled through a numerical factor that is determined based on material constants and the element length. The developed local damage model integrated with the smooth Rankine equivalent strain form results in an effective approach as it offers a physically realistic description of the damage localization in quasi-brittle media. The governing equation of the nonlinear behavior, when damage is involved, is spatially discretized by a nonlinear finite element method, and is efficiently solved using the standard Newton–Raphson method, while the popular Newmark-beta time integration method is applied to its time discretization. We also present the estimation of the crack tip velocity and dissipated energy. To show the accuracy and performance of the developed local damage approach, we study the dynamic crack propagation, and fragmentation branching in materials with brittle and quasi-brittle fracture. The obtained results are compared with experimental data and other numerical solutions available in literature. In terms of computational efficiency, the developed approach requires much less computational time than other numerical models in the same class of the smeared damage approach, i.e., gradient-enhanced and phase-field models, since it just needs to solve a single equation of motion.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Bažant ZP, Oh BH (1983) Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Mater Struct 16:155–177
2. Bažant ZP, Pijaudier-Cabot G (1988) Nonlocal continuum damage, localization instability and convergence. AMSE J Appl Mech 55:287–29310.1115/1.3173674 ↗
3. Belytschko T, Organ D, Gerlach C (2000) Element-free Galerkin methods for dynamic fracture in concrete. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 187(3–4):385–39910.1016/S0045-7825(00)80002-X ↗
4. Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, Hughes TJ, Landis CM (2012) A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 217–220:77–9510.1016/j.cma.2012.01.008 ↗
5. Cervera M, Chiumenti M (2006) Smeared crack approach: back to the original track. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 30(12):1173–119910.1002/nag.518 ↗
6. Cervera M, Pela L, Clemente R, Roca P (2010) A crack-tracking technique for localized damage in quasi-brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech 77:2431–245010.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.06.013 ↗
7. Chin-Hang S, Papoulia DK, Vavasis SA (2005) Obtaining initially rigid cohesive finite element models that are temporally convergent. Eng Fract Mech 72(14):2247–226710.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.12.008 ↗
8. Chudnovsky A, Shulkin Y (1999) Application of the crack layer theory to modeling of slow crack growth in polyethylene. Int J Fract 97:83–10210.1023/A:1018683624720 ↗
9. Cox BN, Gao H, Gross D, Rittel D (2005) Modern topics and challenges in dynamic fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 53:565–59610.1016/j.jmps.2004.09.002 ↗
10. Cusatis G, Rezakhani R, Schauffert EA (2017) Discontinuous Cell Method (DCM) for the simulation of cohesive fracture and fragmentation of continuous media. Eng Fract Mech 170:1–2210.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.11.026 ↗
11. Doan DH, Bui TQ, Do TV, Nguyen DD (2017) A rate-dependent hybrid phase field model for dynamic crack propagation. J Appl Phys 122:11510210.1063/1.4990073 ↗
12. Fineberg J, Bouchbinder E (2015) Recent developments in dynamic fracture: some perspectives. Int J Fract 196:33–5710.1007/s10704-015-0038-x ↗
13. Geelen RJ, Liu Y, Hu T, Tupek MR, Dolbow JE (2019) A phase-field formulation for dynamic cohesive fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 348(10):680–71110.1016/j.cma.2019.01.026 ↗
14. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 221:163–19810.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
15. Hillerborg A, Modéer M, Petersson P-E (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem Concr Res 6:773–78110.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
16. Hirmand MR, Papoulia KD (2019) Block coordinate descent energy minimization for dynamic cohesive fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 354:663–68810.1016/j.cma.2019.05.051 ↗
17. Jirásek M, Bauer M (2012) Numerical aspects of the crack band approach. Comput Struct 110–111:60–7810.1016/j.compstruc.2012.06.006 ↗
18. John R, Shah SP (1990) Mixed-mode fracture of concrete subjected to impact loading. J Struct Eng 116(3):585–60210.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:3(585) ↗
19. Kalthoff J (2000) Modes of dynamic shear failure in solids. Int J Numer Meth Eng 101:1–31
20. Kalthoff J, Winkler S (1987) Failure mode transition at high rates of shear loading. Int Conf Impact Load Dyn Behav Mater 1:185–195
21. Kurumatani M, Terada K, Kato J, Kyoya T, Kashiyama K (2016) An isotropic damage model based on fracture mechanics for concrete. Eng Fract Mech 155:49–6610.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.01.020 ↗
22. Kurumatani M, Soma Y, Terada K (2019) Simulations of cohesive fracture behavior of reinforced concrete by a fracture-mechanics-based damage model. Eng Fract Mech 206:392–40710.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.006 ↗
23. Lemaitre J (1986) Local approach of fracture. Eng Fract Mech 25:523–53710.1016/0013-7944(86)90021-4 ↗
24. Leon S, Spring D, Paulino G (2014) Reduction in mesh bias for dynamic fracture using adaptive splitting of polygonal finite elements. Int J Numer Meth Eng 100(8):555–57610.1002/nme.4744 ↗
25. Li X, Gao W, Liu W (2019) A mesh objective continuum damage model for quasi-brittle crack modelling and finite element implementation. Int J Damage Mech 28:1299–132210.1177/1056789518823876 ↗
26. Liu G, Li Q, Msekh MA, Zuo Z (2016) Abaqus implementation of monolithic and staggered schemes for quasi-static and dynamic fracture phase-field model. Comput Mater Sci 121:35–4710.1016/j.commatsci.2016.04.009 ↗
27. Lloberas-Valls O, Huespe AE, Oliver J, Dias IF (2016) Strain injection techniques in dynamic fracture modeling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 308:499–53410.1016/j.cma.2016.05.023 ↗
28. Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. Proc ASCE J Eng Mech 85:67–94
29. Nguyen THA, Bui TQ, Hirose S (2018) Smoothing gradient damage model with evolving anisotropic nonlocal interactions tailored to low-order finite elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 328:498–54110.1016/j.cma.2017.09.019 ↗
30. Niazi MS, Wisselink HH, Meinders T (2013) Viscoplastic regularization of local damage models: revisited. Comput Mech 51:203–21610.1007/s00466-012-0717-7 ↗
31. Ozaki S, Osada T, Nakao W (2016) Finite element analysis of the damage and healing behavior of self-healing ceramic materials. Int J Solids Struct 100–101:307–31810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.08.026 ↗
32. Ožbolt J, Bošnjak J, Sola E (2013) Dynamic fracture of concrete compact tension specimen: experimental and numerical study. Int J Solids Struct 50(25–26):4270–427810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.08.030 ↗
33. Paulino GH, Park K, Celes W, Espinha R (2010) Adaptive dynamic cohesive fracture simulation using nodal perturbation and edge swap operators. Int J Numer Meth Eng 84(11):1303–134310.1002/nme.2943 ↗
34. Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, Vree JHP, Spee I (1996) Some observations on localisation in non-local and gradient damage models. Eur J Mech A 15:937–953
35. Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, Geers MGD (1998) Gradient-enhanced damage modelling of concrete fracture. Mech Cohesive-Frict Mater 3(4):323–34210.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(1998100)3:4<323::AID-CFM51>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
36. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T (2004) Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Int J Numer Meth Eng 61(13):2316–234310.1002/nme.1151 ↗
37. Rabczuk T, Samaniego E (2008) Discontinuous modelling of shear bands using adaptive meshfree methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:641–65810.1016/j.cma.2007.08.027 ↗
38. Ramulu M, Kobayashi AS, Kang BSJ, Barker DB (1983) Further studies on dynamic crack branching. Exp Mech 23:431–43710.1007/BF02330060 ↗
39. Ravi-Chandar K, Knauss W (1984) An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: III. On steady-state crack propagation and crack branching,. Int J Fract 26:141–15410.1007/BF01157550 ↗
40. Ravi-Chandar K, Knauss W (1984) An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: IV. On the interaction of stress waves with propagating cracks. Int J Fract 26:189–20010.1007/BF01140627 ↗
41. Rizzi E, Carol I, Willam K (1995) Localization analysis of elastic degradation with application to scalar damage. J Eng Mech 121:541–55410.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:4(541) ↗
42. Rots JG, Nauta P, Kuster GMA, Blaauwendraad J (1985) Smeared crack approach and fracture localization in concrete. HERON 30(1)
43. Ruiz G, Pandolfi A, Ortiz M (2001) Three-dimensional cohesive modeling of dynamic mixed-mode fracture. Int J Numer Meth Eng 52(1–2):97–12010.1002/nme.273 ↗
44. Schapery RA (1975) A theory of crack initiation and growth in viscoelastic media I. Theoretical development. Int J Fract 11:141–15910.1007/BF00034721 ↗
45. Song J, Belytschko T (2009) Cracking node method for dynamic fracture with finite elements. Int J Numer Meth Eng 77(33):360–38510.1002/nme.2415 ↗
46. Song JH, Wang H, Belytschko T (2008) A comparative study on finite element methods for dynamic fracture. Comput Mech 42:239–25010.1007/s00466-007-0210-x ↗
47. Wu CT, Ma N, Takada K, Okada H (2016) A meshfree continuous-discontinuous approach for the ductile fracture modeling in explicit dynamics analysis. Comput Mech 58:391–40910.1007/s00466-016-1299-6 ↗
48. Xenos D, Grassl P (2016) Modelling the failure of reinforced concrete with nonlocal and crack band approaches using the damage-plasticity model CDPM2. Finite Elem Anal Des 117–118:11–2010.1016/j.finel.2016.04.002 ↗
49. Zhou S, Rabczuk T, Zhuang X (2018) Phase field modeling of quasi-static and dynamic crack propagation: COMSOL implementation and case studies. Adv Eng Softw 122:31–4910.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.03.012 ↗
50. Zi G, Chen H, Xu J, Belytschko T (2005) The extended finite element method for dynamic fractures. Shock Vib 12(1):9–2310.1155/2005/729090 ↗