journal article·2022-05Open access

Fatigue crack growth behaviour of wire and arc additively manufactured ER70S-6 low carbon steel components

Anna Ermakova, Ali Mehmanparast, Supriyo Ganguly, Nima Razavi, Filippo Berto

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 235· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract The new emerging Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) technology has significant potential to improve material design and efficiency for structural components as well as reducing manufacturing costs. Due to repeated and periodic melting, solidification and reheating of the layers, the WAAM deposition technique results in some elastic, plastic and viscous deformations that can affect material degradation and crack propagation behaviour in additively manufactured components. Therefore, it is crucial to characterise the cracking behaviour in WAAM built components for structural design and integrity assessment purposes. In this work, fatigue crack growth tests have been conducted on compact tension specimens extracted from ER70S-6 steel WAAM built components. The crack propagation behaviour of the specimens extracted with different orientations (i.e. horizontal and vertical with respect to the deposition direction) has been characterised under two different cyclic load levels. The obtained fatigue crack growth rate data have been correlated with the linear elastic fracture mechanics parameter $$\varDelta K$$ and the results are compared with the literature data available for corresponding wrought structural steels and the recommended fatigue crack growth trends in the BS7910 standard. The obtained results have been found to fall below the recommended trends in the BS7910 standard and above the data points obtained from S355 wrought material. The obtained fatigue growth trends and Paris law constants from this study contribute to the overall understanding of the design requirements for the new optimised functionally graded structures fabricated using the WAAM technique.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. American Society for Testing and Materials (2011) ASTME-1820-11: standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness. Annu B ASTM Stand. https://doi.org/10.1520/E1820-1810.1520/E1820-18 ↗
2. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and application. Taylor & Francis Group, New York10.1201/9781420058215 ↗
3. ASTM E647-13. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. Am Soc Test Mater (2014) https://doi.org/10.1520/E0647-15E01.210.1520/E0647-15E01.2 ↗
4. Brandl E, Baufeld B, Leyens C, Gault R (2010) Additive manufactured Ti-6A1-4V using welding wire: comparison of laser and arc beam deposition and evaluation with respect to aerospace material specifications. Phys Procedia 5:595–60610.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.087 ↗
5. BS 7910. BSI Standards Publication Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. BSI Stand. Publ. 490 (2015)
6. Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2015) Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: technologies, developments and future interests. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:465–48110.1007/s00170-015-7077-3 ↗
7. ER70S-6 - Weld WireWeld Wire. http://www.weldwire.net/weld_products/ww70s-6/
8. Ermakova A, Mehmanparast A, Ganguly S (2019) A review of present status and challenges of using additive manufacturing technology for offshore wind applications. Procedia Struct Integr 17:29–3610.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.005 ↗
9. Ermakova A, Mehmanparast A, Ganguly S, Razavi N, Berto F (2020) Investigation of mechanical and fracture properties of wire and arc additively manufactured low carbon steel components. Theor Appl Fract Mech 109:10268510.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102685 ↗
10. Gordon JV, Haden CV, Nied HF, Vinci RP, Harlow DG (2018) Fatigue crack growth anisotropy, texture and residual stress in austenitic steel made by wire and arc additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Eng A 724:431–43810.1016/j.msea.2018.03.075 ↗
11. Greitemeier D, Dalle Donne C, Syassen F, Eufinger J, Melz T (2016) Effect of surface roughness on fatigue performance of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Technol (United Kingdom) 32:629–63410.1179/1743284715Y.0000000053 ↗
12. Igwemezie V, Mehmanparast A, Kolios A (2019) Current trend in offshore wind energy sector and material requirements for fatigue resistance improvement in large wind turbine support structures—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 101:181–19610.1016/j.rser.2018.11.002 ↗
13. Jacob A et al (2018) Residual stress measurements in offshore wind monopile weldments using neutron diffraction technique and contour method. Theor Appl Fract Mech 96:418–42710.1016/j.tafmec.2018.06.001 ↗
14. Jacob A, Mehmanparast A (2021) Crack growth direction effects on corrosion-fatigue behaviour of offshore wind turbine steel weldments. Mar Struct 75:10288110.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102881 ↗
15. Jacob A, Mehmanparast A, D’Urzo R, Kelleher J (2019) Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stress effects on fatigue crack growth behaviour of S355 steel weldments. Int J Fatigue 128:10519610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105196 ↗
16. Lincoln Electric Company, T. LINCOLN ®ER70S-6 Welding Positions Typical Applications. www.lincolnelectric.com
17. Martina F, Mehnen J, Williams SW, Colegrove P, Wang F (2012) Investigation of the benefits of plasma deposition for the additive layer manufacture of Ti-6Al-4V. J Mater Process Technol 212:1377–138610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.02.002 ↗
18. Mehmanparast A, Brennan F, Tavares I (2017) Fatigue crack growth rates for offshore wind monopile weldments in air and seawater: SLIC inter-laboratory test results. Mater Des 114:494–50410.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.070 ↗
19. Mild Steel Welding Alloy ER70S-6 (GMAW) (MIG) ER70S-6 (GMAW) (MIG) Mild Steel Alloy $$\cdot $$ AWS ER70S-6. www.mathesongas.com
20. Nezhadfar PD et al (2019) Fatigue crack growth behavior of additively manufactured 17–4 PH stainless steel: effects of build orientation and microstructure. Int J Fatigue 123:168–17910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.015 ↗
21. Pegues J, Roach M, Scott Williamson R, Shamsaei N (2018) Surface roughness effects on the fatigue strength of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Fatigue 116:543–55210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.013 ↗
22. Rafieazad M, Ghaffari M, Vahedi Nemani A, Nasiri A (2019) Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of a low-carbon low-alloy steel produced by wire arc additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:2121–213410.1007/s00170-019-04393-8 ↗
23. Rafieazad M, Nemani AV, Ghaffari M, Nasiri A (2021) On Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Low-Carbon Low-Alloy Steel Block Fabricated by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing. J Mater Eng Perform. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05568-910.1007/s11665-021-05568-9 ↗
24. Wang F, Williams S, Rush M (2011) Morphology investigation on direct current pulsed gas tungsten arc welded additive layer manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57:597–60310.1007/s00170-011-3299-1 ↗
25. Williams SW et al (2015) Wire $$+$$ Arc Additive Manufacturing. Mater Sci Technol 32:641–64710.1179/1743284715Y.0000000073 ↗
26. Xu X et al (2018) Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of maraging steel produced by wire $$+$$ arc additive manufacture process. Mater Charact 143:152–16210.1016/j.matchar.2017.12.002 ↗
27. Zhang J, Wang X, Paddea S, Zhang X (2016) Fatigue crack propagation behaviour in wire$$+$$arc additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V: effects of microstructure and residual stress. Mater Des 90:551–56110.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.141 ↗
28. Zhang X, Martina F, Ding J, Wang X, Williams SW (2017) Fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth rate properties in wire $$+$$ arc additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Fatig Fract Eng Mater Struct 40:790–80310.1111/ffe.12547 ↗
29. Zhang X, Martina F, Syed AK (2017a) Fatigue Crack Growth in Additive Manufactured Titanium: Residual stress control and life evaluation method development Corrosion fatigue: pit-to-cracking transition-experimental and numerical modelling View project “Modelling Applications of Additive Manuf. 7–9 https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29032.1664310.13140/RG.2.2.29032.16643 ↗