Effective Assessment of Inelastic Torsional Deformation of Plan-Asymmetric Shear Wall Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Torsional deformation may occur in plan-asymmetric wall structures during seismic events. In most current seismic design codes, the torsional deformation is handled using the concept of design eccentricity, in which design loads may be excessively amplified. This approach has limitations in accurately estimating the torsional deformation of the plan-asymmetric structures, mainly because it is based on linear elastic material behavior. In this paper, we propose a simple method that can accurately evaluate the inelastic lateral displacement and rotation of plan-asymmetric wall structures and is suitable for use in the displacement-based design method. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by comparing its predictions with the results of rigorous time history analyses for a model problem. The comparison shows that the proposed method is able to provide accurate estimates of the inelastic torsional deformation for the plan-asymmetric wall system, while requiring less computational cost than the time history analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Steel Solution Center, POSCO, Incheon 21985, Korea
Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
Department of Architectural Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea
Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Lessons from the 1985 Mexican Earthquake10.1139/l86-081 ↗
2. Collapse of Eight-Story RC Building during 1985 Chile Earthquake10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:2(600) ↗
3. Damage to Buildings Due to the 1989 Loma-Prieta Earthquake—A Canadian Code Perspective10.1139/l90-093 ↗
4. Damage to concrete structures due to the January 17, 1995, Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake10.1139/l96-886 ↗
5. International Code Council (2014). 2015 International Building Code, International Code Council.
6. Standards New Zealand (2004). Structural Design Actions. Part 5, Earthquake Actions: New Zealand, Standards New Zealand. NZS 1170.
7. National Research Council Canada and Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes (2015). National Building Code of Canada, 2015, Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, National Research Council of Canada.
8. British Standards Institution and European Committee for Standardization (2004). Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance Part 1, General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, British Standards Institution.
9. Dual-Level Approach for Seismic Design of Asymmetric-Plan Buildings10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:1(161) ↗
10. An optimized procedure for seismic design of torsionally unbalanced structures10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199707)26:7<737::AID-EQE673>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
11. Effect of orthogonal inplane structural elements on inelastic torsional response10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199910)28:10<1071::AID-EQE855>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
12. Displacement-based design approach to earthquake-induced torsion in ductile buildings10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00167-3 ↗
13. Torsional mechanisms in ductile building systems10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199810)27:10<1101::AID-EQE773>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
14. Inelastic seismic response of one-way plan-asymmetric systems under bi-directional ground motions10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199804)27:4<363::AID-EQE728>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
15. Inelastic behavior of asymmetric multistory buildings10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:6(597) ↗
16. Simplified seismic analysis of asymmetric building systems10.1002/eqe.635 ↗
17. Nonlinear cyclic truss model for reinforced concrete walls
18. Three-dimensional cyclic beam-truss model for nonplanar reinforced concrete walls10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000852 ↗
19. Seismic evaluation of asymmetric wall systems using a modified three-dimensional capacity spectrum method
20. Using nonlinear static procedures for seismic assessment of the 3D irregular SPEAR building10.12989/eas.2010.1.2.177 ↗
21. Seismic evaluation of an existing complex RC building10.1007/s10518-009-9155-0 ↗
22. Case study of seismic performance assessment of irregular RC buildings: Hospital structure of Avezzano (L’Aquila, Italy)10.1007/s11803-015-0012-7 ↗
23. Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: Critical review and state of the art10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.305 ↗
24. A Methodology for Seismic Design of RC Shear Walls10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:3(863) ↗
25. An estimation of displacement limits for ductile systems10.1002/eqe.157 ↗
26. (2014). MATLAB 2014a, The MathWorks, Inc.
27. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H., and Fenves, G.L. (2009). Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation: User Command, Language Manual, PEER Center, UC.
28. Viscous damping in seismic design and analysis10.1142/S1363246905002365 ↗
29. Analytical modeling of inelastic seismic response of R/C structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:4(996) ↗
30. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2017, January 07). PEER Ground Motion Database. Available online: https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
31. Generalized force vectors for multi-mode pushover analysis of torsionally coupled systems10.1002/eqe.2434 ↗
32. Multi-mode pushover procedure for deformation demand estimates of steel moment-resisting frames10.1007/s13296-017-6022-8 ↗
33. An adaptive capacity spectrum method for estimating seismic response of steel moment-resisting frames
34. Nonlinear and linearized combination coefficients for modal pushover analysis