Competition Among the World’s Main Technological Powers to Develop IPs: Cross-National Longitudinal Patentography Over a 9-Year Time Span
Source abstract
Abstract
Relatively few studies have focused on systematically mining the patent databases of different countries. This study mines the databases of the main ‘technological powers’ using several methods. By using descriptive statistical methods, the study yields key insights regarding patenting activities affecting the succession and ‘crowding out’ of technologies, the ‘hottest technologies’ and the patent application strategies in these countries. The spectrums of technological strength in these countries are further analysed with Principal Component Analysis (PCA), as two principal components are sufficient to resolve over 92% of the total variance. The US, EU and China are the economies that all technological powers may regard as important; similarities in the application strategies used in these countries are thus further investigated. Another extensive analysis utilising K-means clustering is also performed. Except for the optimal number for patent clustering, surprisingly, the top 10 ‘most important technologies’ are identical to the top 10 hottest ones that were previously identified. The knowledge and insights gained from this study are valuable not only for technological development policy makers, but also for business decision makers seeking suitable markets and areas to enter and invest in. Some data visualization and analysis methods are applied for the first time to this knowledge discovery problem.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intellectual Property and Patents · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Economic and Technological Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Taiwan Data Science Co. Ltd., Taipei 104, Taiwan
Department of Civil Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan · Taipei Medical University
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Application of S-shaped curves10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.142 ↗
2. Assessing technological threats
3. Breitzman, A.F., and Narin, F. (2001). Method and apparatus for choosing a stock portfolio, based on patent indicators. (6,175,824), U.S. Patent.
4. Thomas, P., and Narin, F. (2004). System and method for producing technology-based price targets for a company stock. (6,832,211), U.S. Patent.
5. Lin, H.-Y. (2005). A Model and Platform for Patent Search/Valuation. [Master’s Thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, National Tsing-Hua University].
6. Narin, F., Albert, M., Kroll, P., and Hicks, D. (2000). Inventing Our Future—The Link between Australian Patenting and basic Science, CHI Report.
7. Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning10.1016/S0923-4748(98)00018-6 ↗
8. Patent information for strategic technology management10.1016/S0172-2190(03)00077-2 ↗
9. Valuable Patents
10. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space10.1080/14786440109462720 ↗
11. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components10.1037/h0071325 ↗
12. Zhuang, Z.Y., and Ouhyoung, M. (1997, January 13–16). Novel multiresolution metrics for content-based image retrieval. Proceedings of the Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, In pg (Pacific Graphics), Seoul, KOREA.
13. Ho, N., and Jarvis, R. (2008, January 22–26). Vision based global localisation using a 3D environmental model created by a laser range scanner. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2008, Nice, France.
14. An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.006 ↗
15. Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm
16. A comparative study of efficient initialization methods for the k-means clustering algorithm10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.021 ↗
17. Data mining techniques in social media: A survey10.1016/j.neucom.2016.06.045 ↗
18. Technology forecasting using topic-based patent analysis
19. Improving k-means through distributed scalable metaheuristics10.1016/j.neucom.2016.07.074 ↗
20. Raschka, S. (2015). Python Machine Learning, Packt Publishing Ltd.
21. Kassambara, A. (2017). Practical Guide to Cluster Analysis in R, CreateSpace.
22. World Intellectual Property Organization (2017, November 04). International Patent Classification. Available online: http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/en/.
23. Understanding the success factors of sustainable supply chain management: empirical evidence from the electrics and electronics industry10.1002/csr.261 ↗
24. Merritt, R. (2017, December 16). Smartphone, Samsung in Trouble. Available online: https://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1325927.
25. Kim, W.C., and Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant, Harvard Business School Press.
26. Chi, L.-P., Zhuang, Z.-Y., Fu, C.-H., and Huang, J.-H. (2018). A Knowledge Discovery Education Framework Targeting the Effective Budget Use and Opinion Explorations in Designing Specific High Cost Product. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10082742 ↗
27. Zhuang, Z.-Y., Lin, C.-C., Chen, C.-Y., and Su, C.-R. (2018). Rank-Based Comparative Research Flow Benchmarking the Effectiveness of AHP–GTMA on Aiding Decisions of Shredder Selection by Reference to AHP–TOPSIS. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8101974 ↗
28. Husson, F., Lê, S., and Pagès, J. (2017). Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R, Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/b21874 ↗
29. Everitt, B., and Hothorn, T. (2011). An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis with R, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4419-9650-3 ↗
30. Rudlin, P., and 4 Differences between Japanese and German Approaches to Work, Communication and Customer Service (2018, May 06). Official Website of Japan Intercultural Consulting. Available online: https://www.japanintercultural.com/en/blogs/default.aspx?blogid=240.
31. Integrating sustainability into supplier selection: A grey-based TOPSIS analysis10.3846/tede.2018.5582 ↗
32. Deregulation control by mergers and acquisitions: A game theoretic analysis of the Chinese airline industry10.3846/20294913.2016.1266410 ↗
33. Analysis of project success factors in construction industry10.3846/20294913.2015.1074129 ↗
34. The effectiveness of IF-MADM (intuitionistic-fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making) for group decisions: Methods and an empirical assessment for the selection of a senior centre10.3846/tede.2019.8399 ↗