Spatial Uncertainty Modeling for Surface Roughness of Additively Manufactured Microstructures via Image Segmentation
Source abstract
Abstract
Despite recent advances in additive manufacturing (AM) that shifts the paradigm of modern manufacturing by its fast, flexible, and affordable manufacturing method, the achievement of high-dimensional accuracy in AM to ensure product consistency and reliability is still an unmet challenge. This study suggests a general method to establish a mathematical spatial uncertainty model based on the measured geometry of AM microstructures. Spatial uncertainty is specified as the deviation between the planned and the actual AM geometries of a model structure, high-aspect-ratio struts. The detailed steps of quantifying spatial uncertainties in the AM geometry are as follows: (1) image segmentation to extract the sidewall profiles of AM geometry; (2) variability-based sampling; (3) Gaussian process modeling for spatial uncertainty. The modeled spatial uncertainty is superimposed in the CAD geometry and finite element analysis is performed to quantify its effect on the mechanical behavior of AM struts with different printing angles under compressive loading conditions. The results indicate that the stiffness of AM struts with spatial uncertainty is reduced to 70% of the stiffness of CAD geometry and the maximum von Mises stress under compressive loading is significantly increased by the spatial uncertainties. The proposed modeling framework enables the high fidelity of computer-based predictive tools by seamlessly incorporating spatial uncertainties from digital images of AM parts into a traditional finite element model. It can also be applied to parts produced by other manufacturing processes as well as other AM techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1206 W. Green ST., Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University–New Brunswick, 98 Brett Rd., Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
Funding
National Science Foundation · Agency for Defense Development
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 ↗
2. Three-dimensional printing based hybrid manufacturing of microfluidic devices10.1115/1.4031231 ↗
3. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials10.1126/science.1252291 ↗
4. Nanolattices: An emerging class of mechanical metamaterials10.1002/adma.201701850 ↗
5. Designing metallic microlattices for energy absorber applications10.1002/adem.201300206 ↗
6. Tailored buckling microlattices as reusable light-weight shock absorbers10.1002/adma.201600610 ↗
7. Additively-manufactured metallic micro-lattice Materials for high specific energy absorption under static and dynamic loading10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.054 ↗
8. Anisotropic convective heat transfer in microlattice materials10.1002/aic.13821 ↗
9. Multifunctional heat exchangers derived from three-dimensional micro-lattice structures10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.01.011 ↗
10. Rapid prototyping: Porous titanium alloy scaffolds produced by selective laser melting for bone tissue engineering10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0288 ↗
11. Surface roughness prediction using measured data and interpolation in layered manufacturing10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.050 ↗
12. Ancau, M., and Caizar, C. (2008, January 22–24). The optimization of surface quality in rapid prototyping. Proceedings of the WSEAS International Conference on Engineering Mechanics, Structures, Engineering Geology, Heraklion, Crete Island, Greece.
13. Hasan, R. (2013). Progressive Collapse of Titanium Alloy Micro-Lattice Structures Manufactured Using Selective Laser Melting. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool].
14. Mechanical characterization of hollow ceramic nanolattices10.1007/s10853-013-7945-x ↗
15. Design and optimization of a light-emitting diode projection micro-stereolithography three-dimensional manufacturing system10.1063/1.4769050 ↗
16. Projection micro-stereolithography using digital micro-mirror dynamic mask10.1016/j.sna.2004.12.011 ↗
17. Data-driven stochastic models for spatial uncertainties in micromechanical systems10.1088/0960-1317/25/11/115009 ↗
18. A review on image segmentation techniques10.1016/0031-3203(93)90135-J ↗
19. Shapiro, L., and Stockman, G.C. (2001). Computer Vision, Prentice Hall.
20. A review of statistical approaches to level set segmentation: Integrating color, texture, motion and shape10.1007/s11263-006-8711-1 ↗
21. A survey of thresholding techniques10.1016/0734-189X(88)90022-9 ↗
22. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on hamilton-jacobi formulations10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2 ↗
23. Active contours without edges10.1109/83.902291 ↗
24. Local variability based sampling for mapping a soil erosion cover factor by co-simulation with landsat tm images10.1080/01431160600554413 ↗
25. Sequential measurement strategy for wafer geometric profile estimation10.1080/0740817X.2011.557030 ↗
26. Kim, N., Bhalerao, I., Han, D., Yang, C., and Lee, H. (2019). Improving surface roughness of additively manufactured parts using a photopolymerization model and multi-objective particle swarm optimization. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9010151 ↗
27. Rasmussen, C.E. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer.
28. Cressie, N. (1993). Statistics for Spatial Data, John Wiley and Sons Ltd.10.1002/9781119115151 ↗
29. De Boor, C. (1978). A Practical Guide to Splines, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-6333-3 ↗
30. Bishop, C.M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer.
31. Alwan, A., and Aluru, N.R. (2015). A nonstationary covariance function model for spatial uncertainties in electrostatically actuated microsystems. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif., 5.10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2015011166 ↗
32. Pymc: Bayesian stochastic modelling in python10.18637/jss.v035.i04 ↗
33. An efficient local chan–vese model for image segmentation10.1016/j.patcog.2009.08.002 ↗
34. Asaro, R., and Lubarda, V. (2006). Mechanics of Solids and Materials, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755514 ↗