Interpolation of Turbulent Boundary Layer Profiles Measured in Flight Using Response Surface Methodology
Source abstract
Abstract
Turbulent boundary layer profiles on the aircraft surface were characterized by pitot-rake measurements conducted in flight experiments at high subsonic Mach number ranges. Due to slight variations in atmospheric air conditions or aircraft attitudes, such as angles of attack and absolute flight speeds at different flights even under the same premised flight conditions, the boundary layer profiles measured at different flights can exhibit different shape and velocity values. This concern leads to difficulty in evaluating the efficiency of using some kind of drag-controlling device such as riblets in the flight test, since the evaluation would be conducted by comparing the profiles measured with and without using riblets at different flights. An approach was implemented to interpolate the boundary layer profile for a flight condition of interest based on the response surface method, in order to eliminate the influence of the flight conditional difference. Results showed that the interpolation with the 3rd-degree response surface model with a combination of two independent variables of flight Mach number and total pressure successfully eliminated the influence of the flight conditional difference, and interpolated the boundary layer profiles measured at different flights within an inaccuracy of 4.1% for the flight Mach number range of 0.5 to 0.78.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research and Development Directorate, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Kakuda, Miyagi 981-1525, Japan
Aeronautical Technology Directorate, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8522, Japan
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Szodruch, J. (1991, January 7–10). Viscous Drag Reduction on Transport Aircraft Reno. Proceedings of the AIAA 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, USA. AIAA Paper 91-0685.10.2514/6.1991-685 ↗
2. Three-dimensional suction flow control and suction jet length optimization of NACA 0012 wing10.1007/s11012-015-0100-9 ↗
3. Suction control of flow separation of a low-aspect-ratio wing at low Reynolds-number10.1088/1873-7005/aad903 ↗
4. Numerical study of blowing and suction slot geometry optimization on NACA 0012 airfoil10.1007/s12206-014-0119-1 ↗
5. Active control of flow separation over an airfoil using synthetic jets10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.06.017 ↗
6. Flow control on the NREL S809 wind turbine airfoil using vortex generators10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.003 ↗
7. A Review of Drag Reduction by Riblets and Micro-Textures in the Turbulent Boundary Layers
8. Bushness, H. (1989). Riblets, Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics.
9. Riblets as a Viscous Drag Reduction Technique10.2514/3.60126 ↗
10. Drag reduction using riblet film applied to airfoils for wind turbines10.1115/1.4024982 ↗
11. Drag reduction using wrinkled surfaces in high Reynolds number laminar boundary layer flows10.1063/1.4995566 ↗
12. Parametric Study on a Sinusoidal Riblet for Drag Reduction by Direct Numerical Simulation10.1007/s10494-017-9805-2 ↗
13. Effect of Compliant Wall Motion on Turbulent Boundary Layers10.1063/1.861756 ↗
14. Turbulent Drag Reduction Mechanism Above a Riblet Surface10.2514/3.12174 ↗
15. Shark-Skin Surfaces for Fluid-Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flow: A Review10.1098/rsta.2010.0201 ↗
16. Aircraft Viscous Drag Reduction Using Riblets10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00048-9 ↗
17. Development of Turbulence Model to Simulate Drag Reducing Effects of Riblets
18. Sawyer, W., and Winter, K. (1987). An Investigation of the Effect on Turbulent Skin Friction of Surface with Streamwise Grooves. Turbulent Drag Reduction by Passive Means, The Royal Aeronautical Society.
19. Walsh, M.J. (1982, January 11–14). Turbulent Boundary Layer Drag Reduction Using Riblets. Proceedings of the AIAA 20th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL, USA. AIAA Paper 82-0169.10.2514/6.1982-169 ↗
20. Experiments on Drag-Reducing Surfaces and their Optimization with an Adjustable Geometry10.1017/S0022112096004673 ↗
21. MBB Transport Aircraft Group (1988). Microscopic Rib Profiles Will Increase Aircraft Economy in Flight. Aircr. Eng., 60, 11.10.1108/eb036554 ↗
22. Kurita, M., Nishizawa, A., Okabayashi, K., Koga, S., Kwak, T., Nakakita, K., and Naka, Y. (November, January 31). FINE: Flight Investigation of Skin-Friction Reducing Eco-Coating. Proceedings of the 54th Aircraft Symposium, Toyama, Japan. (In Japanese).
23. Koga, S., Kurita, M., Iijima, H., Okabayashi, K., Nishizawa, A., Takahashi, H., and Endo, S. (November, January 31). Wind Tunnel Tests for Measurement System Design of Flight Investigation of Skin-Friction Reducing Eco-Coating (FINE). Proceedings of the 54th Aircraft Symposium, Toyama, Japan. (In Japanese).
24. Response Surface Methods for Efficient Aerodynamic Surrogate Models10.1007/978-3-642-38877-4_9 ↗
25. Aerodynamic Design of a Flying Wing Using Response Surface Methodology10.2514/2.2665 ↗
26. Combining Shaping and Flow Control for Aerodynamic Optimization10.2514/1.J053277 ↗
27. Response Surface Approximations: Noise, Error Repair, and Modeling Errors10.2514/2.903 ↗
28. Response Surface Techniques for Diffuser Shape Optimization10.2514/2.1160 ↗
29. Riblet Drag at Flight Conditions10.2514/3.45804 ↗
30. Effects of Plume Impingements of Clustered Nozzles on the Surface Skin Friction10.2514/1.B35343 ↗
31. Direct Measurement of Skin Friction in a Turbine Cascade10.2514/3.24020 ↗
32. Allen, J.M. (1980, January 14–16). An Improved Sensing Element for Skin-Friction Balance Measurements. Proceedings of the AIAA 18th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Pasadena, CA, USA. AIAA Paper 1980-0049.10.2514/6.1980-49 ↗
33. Walsh, M.J., Sellers, W.L., and McGinley, C.B. (, January 6–8). Riblet Drag Reduction at Flight Conditions. Proceedings of the AIAA 6th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Williamsburg, VA, USA. AIAA Paper 88-2554.
34. Extraction of Skin-Friction Fields from Surface Flow Visualizations as an Inverse Problem10.1088/0957-0233/24/12/124004 ↗
35. Effects of Wall Temperature on Skin-Friction Measurements by Oil-Film Interferometry10.1088/0957-0233/26/10/105301 ↗
36. Mclean, J.D., George-Falvy, D.N., and Sullivan, P.P. (1987). Flight-Test of Turbulent Skin-Friction Reduction by Riblets. Turbulent Drag Reduction by Passive Means, The Royal Aeronautical Society.
37. Larson, T.J. (1984). Evaluation of a Flow Direction Probe and a Pitot-Static Probe on the F-14 Airplane at High Angles of Attack and Sideslip.
38. Kurita, M., Nishizawa, A., Kwak, D., Iijima, H., Iijima, Y., Takahashi, H., Sasamori, M., Abe, H., Koga, S., and Nakakita, K. (2018, January 25–29). Flight Test of a Paint-Riblet for Reducing Skin-Friction. Proceedings of the AIAA 2018 Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA. AIAA paper 2018-3005.10.2514/6.2018-3005 ↗
39. Bushnell, D.M., Hefner, J., and Walsh, M.J. (1990). Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.10.2514/4.865978 ↗
40. Box, G.E.P., and Draper, N.R. (1987). Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, Wiley.
41. Response Surface Methodology10.1002/wics.73 ↗