journal article·2016-06

A nonlinear cohesive/friction coupled model for shear induced delamination of adhesive composite joint

P. F. Liu, Z. P. Gu, X. Q. Peng

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 199· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper originally proposes a nonlinear cohesive/frictional contact coupled model for the mode-II shear delamination of adhesive composite joint based on a modified Xu and Needleman’s exponential cohesive model. First, the friction is assumed to increase nonlinearly at the delamination interface when the tangential cohesive softening appears. Second, a non-associative plasticity model based on the Mohr–Coulomb frictional contact law is proposed, which includes a frictional slip criterion and a slip potential function. Third, a return mapping algorithm based on the non-associative plasticity theory is proposed to solve the updated normal and tangential tractions and stiffnesses. It is shown the tangential cohesive traction and stiffness depend on the friction and dilatancy of the delamination interface. Finally, the proposed theoretical model is implemented using three-dimensional finite element analysis by ABAQUS-UEL (user element subroutine) and demonstrated by comparing the finite element results with the analytical results for the $$[0\circ ]6$$ , $$[\pm 30\circ ]5$$ , $$[\pm 45\circ ]5$$ end-notched flexure adhesive composite joints with the mode-II shear delamination. The effects of the friction coefficient, cohesive strength, normal contact stiffness and mesh size on the load–displacement curves and delamination mechanisms of composites are studied. Numerical results show the shear delamination growth is governed by the transition from the decreased tangential cohesive traction to the increased tangential friction, and the frictional effect becomes distinct after unstable delamination for angle-ply laminates.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Abdul-Baqi A, Van der Giessen E (2002) Numerical analysis of indentation-induced cracking of brittle coatings on ductile substrates. Int J Solids Struct 39:1427–144210.1016/S0020-7683(01)00280-3 ↗
2. Alfano G, Crisfield M (2001) Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:1701–173610.1002/nme.93 ↗
3. Alfano G, Sacco E (2006) Combining interface damage and friction in a cohesive zone model. Int J Numer Methods Eng 68:542–58210.1002/nme.1728 ↗
4. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–12910.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
5. Bathe KJ, Chaudhary A (1985) A solution method for planar and axisymmetric contact problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 21:65–8810.1002/nme.1620210107 ↗
6. Bažant ZP, Oh BH (1983) Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Mater Struct 16:155–177
7. Benzeggagh ML, Kenane M (1996) Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Compos Sci Technol 56:439–44910.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
8. Broek D (1984) Elementary engineering fracture mechanics, 3rd edn. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague
9. Camacho G, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33:2899–293810.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-3 ↗
10. Camanho PP, Davila C, De Moura M (2003) Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials. J Compos Mater 37:1415–143810.1177/0021998303034505 ↗
11. Campilho RDSG, Banea MD, Neto JABP, da Silva LFM (2013) Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer. Inter J Adhes Adhes 44:48–5610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
12. Carlsson L, Gillespie J, Pipes R (1986) On the analysis and design of the end notched flexure (ENF) specimen for mode II testing. J Compos Mater 20:594–60410.1177/002199838602000606 ↗
13. Chaboche J, Girard R, Schaff A (1997) Numerical analysis of composite systems by using interphase/interface models. Comput Mech 20:3–1110.1007/s004660050209 ↗
14. Cheng L, Guo TF (2007) Void interaction and coalescence in polymeric materials. Int J Solids Struct 44:1787–180810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.08.007 ↗
15. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100–10410.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
16. Fan C, Ben Jar PY, Roger Cheng JJ (2007) A unified approach to quantify the role of friction in beam-type specimens for the measurement of mode II delamination resistance of fibre-reinforced polymers. Compos Sci Technol 67:989–99510.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.011 ↗
17. Foulk J, Allen D, Helms K (2000) Formulation of a three-dimensional cohesive zone model for application to a finite element algorithm. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 183:51–6610.1016/S0045-7825(99)00211-X ↗
18. Gao YF, Bower AF (2004) A simple technique for avoiding convergence problems in finite element simulations of crack nucleation and growth on cohesive interfaces. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 12:453–46310.1088/0965-0393/12/3/007 ↗
19. Geubelle PH, Baylor JS (1998) Impact-induced delamination of composites: a 2D simulation. Compos Part B Eng 29:589–60210.1016/S1359-8368(98)00013-4 ↗
20. Goyal VK, Johnson ER, Davila CG (2004) Irreversible constitutive law for modeling the delamination process using interfacial surface discontinuities. Compos Struct 65:289–30510.1016/j.compstruct.2003.11.005 ↗
21. Guiamatsia I, Nguyen GD (2014) A thermodynamics-based cohesive model for interface debonding and friction. Int J Solids Struct 51:647–65910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.10.032 ↗
22. Gustafson PA, Waas AM (2009) The influence of adhesive constitutive parameters in cohesive zone finite element models of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Solids Struct 46:2201–221510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.11.016 ↗
23. Harper PW, Hallett SR (2008) Cohesive zone length in numerical simulations of composite delamination. Eng Fract Mech 75:4774–479210.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.06.004 ↗
24. Hattiangadi A, Siegmund T (2005) An analysis of the delamination of an environmental protection coating under cyclic heat loads. Eur J Mech A/Solids 24:361–37010.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.01.003 ↗
25. Jiang WG, Hallett SR, Green BG, Wisnom MR (2007) A concise interface constitutive law for analysis of delamination and splitting in composite materials and its application to scaled notched tensile specimens. Int J Numer Methods Eng 69:1982–199510.1002/nme.1842 ↗
26. Krueger R (2004) Virtual crack closure technique: history, approach, and applications. Appl Mech Rev 57:109–14310.1115/1.1595677 ↗
27. Liljedahl CDM, Crocombe AD, Wahab MA, Ashcroft IA (2006) Damage modelling of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Fract 141:147–16110.1007/s10704-006-0072-9 ↗
28. Lin G, Geubelle P, Sottos N (2001) Simulation of fiber debonding with friction in a model composite pushout test. Int J Solids Struct 38:8547–856210.1016/S0020-7683(01)00085-3 ↗
29. Liu PF (2015) Extended finite element method for strong discontinuity analysis of strain localization of non-associative plasticity materials. Int J Solids Struct 72:174–18910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.07.021 ↗
30. Liu PF, Hou SJ, Chu JK, Hu XY, Zhou CL, Liu YL, Zheng JY, Zhao A, Yan L (2011) Finite element analysis of postbuckling and delamination of composite laminates using virtual crack closure technique. Compos Struct 93:1549–156010.1016/j.compstruct.2010.12.006 ↗
31. Liu PF, Islam MM (2013) A nonlinear cohesive model for mixed-mode delamination of composite laminates. Compos Struct 106:47–5610.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.049 ↗
32. Liu PF, Gu ZP, Peng XQ, Zheng JY (2015) Finite element analysis of the influence of cohesive law parameters on the multiple delamination behaviors of composites under compression. Compos Struct 131:975–98610.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.058 ↗
33. Liu PF, Yang YH (2014) Finite element analysis of the competition between crack deflection and penetration of fiber-reinforced composites using virtual crack closure technique. Appl Compos Mater 21:759–77110.1007/s10443-013-9375-y ↗
34. Liu PF, Zheng JY (2013) On the through-the-width multiple delamination, and buckling and postbuckling behaviors of symmetric and unsymmetric composite laminates. Appl Compos Mater 20:1147–116010.1007/s10443-013-9321-z ↗
35. Mi Y, Crisfield MA, Davies GA, Hellweg HB (1998) Progressive delamination using interface elements. J Compos Mater 32:1246–127210.1177/002199839803201401 ↗
36. McGarry JP, Máirtín ÉÓ, Parry G, Beltz GE (2014) Potential-based and non-potential-based cohesive zone formulations under mixed-mode separation and over-closure. Part I: Theoretical analysis. J Mech Phys Solids 63:336–36210.1016/j.jmps.2013.08.020 ↗
37. Moës N, Belytschko T (2002) Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth. Eng Fract Mech 69:813–83310.1016/S0013-7944(01)00128-X ↗
38. Mortensen F, Thomsen OT (2002) Analysis of adhesive bonded joints: a unified approach. Compos Sci Technol 62:1011–103110.1016/S0266-3538(02)00030-1 ↗
39. Noorman DC (2014) Analysis on crack propagation in adhesives and adherends. Master thesis, Delft University of Technology
40. Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44:1267–128210.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
41. Ozdil F, Carlsson L, Davies P (1998) Beam analysis of angle-ply laminate end-notched flexure specimens. Compos Sci Technol 58:1929–193810.1016/S0266-3538(98)00018-9 ↗
42. Park K, Paulino GH, Roesler JR (2009) A unified potential-based cohesive model of mixed-mode fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 57:891–90810.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.003 ↗
43. Parrinello F, Failla B, Borino G (2009) Cohesive-frictional interface constitutive model. Int J Solids Struct 46:2680–269210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.016 ↗
44. Parrinello F, Marannano G, Borino G, Pasta A (2013) Frictional effect in mode II delamination: experimental test and numerical simulation. Eng Fract Mech 110:258–26910.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.08.005 ↗
45. Perić D, Owen D (1992) Computational model for 3D contact problems with friction based on the penalty method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 35:1289–130910.1002/nme.1620350609 ↗
46. Raous M, Cangémi L, Cocu M (1999) A consistent model coupling adhesion, friction, and unilateral contact. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 177:383–39910.1016/S0045-7825(98)00389-2 ↗
47. Russell A, Street K (1982) Factors affecting the interlaminar fracture energy of graphite/epoxy laminates. Progress in science and Engineering of Composites, ICCM-IV, Tokyo, Japan, pp 279–286
48. Rybicki EF, Kanninen MF (1977) A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral. Eng Fract Mech 9:931–93810.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
49. Schellekens JCJ, de Borst R (1993) On the numerical integration of interface elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 36:43–6610.1002/nme.1620360104 ↗
50. Schön J (2000) Coefficient of friction of composite delamination surfaces. Wear 237:77–8910.1016/S0043-1648(99)00315-4 ↗
51. Segurado J, LLorca J (2004) A new three-dimensional interface finite element to simulate fracture in composites. Int J Solids Struct 41:2977–299310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.01.007 ↗
52. Serpieri R, Sacco E, Alfano G (2015) A thermodynamically consistent derivation of a frictional-damage cohesive-zone model with different mode I and mode II fracture energies. Eur J Mech A/Solids 49:13–2510.1016/j.euromechsol.2014.06.006 ↗
53. Simo JC, Wriggers P, Schweizerhof K, Taylor R (1986) Finite deformation post-buckling analysis involving inelasticity and contact constraints. Int J Numer Methods Eng 23:779–80010.1002/nme.1620230504 ↗
54. Snozzi L, Molinari JF (2013) A cohesive element model for mixed mode loading with frictional contact capability. Int J Numer Methods Eng 93:510–52610.1002/nme.4398 ↗
55. Theotokoglou E, Vrettos C (2006) A finite element analysis of angle-ply laminate end-notched flexure specimens. Compos Struct 73:370–37910.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.010 ↗
56. Turon A, Camanho PP, Costa J, Dávila C (2006) A damage model for the simulation of delamination in advanced composites under variable-mode loading. Mech Mater 38:1072–108910.1016/j.mechmat.2005.10.003 ↗
57. Turon A, Davila CG, Camanho PP, Costa J (2007) An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models. Eng Fract Mech 74:1665–168210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
58. Tvergaard V (1990) Effect of fibre debonding in a whisker-reinforced metal. Mater Sci Eng A 125:203–21310.1016/0921-5093(90)90170-8 ↗
59. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1993) The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness. J Mech Phys Solids 41:1119–113510.1016/0022-5096(93)90057-M ↗
60. Van den Bosch M, Schreurs P, Geers M (2006) An improved description of the exponential Xu and Needleman cohesive zone law for mixed-mode decohesion. Eng Fract Mech 73:1220–123410.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.12.006 ↗
61. Weyler R, Oliver J, Sain T, Cante J (2012) On the contact domain method: a comparison of penalty and Lagrange multiplier implementations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 205:68–8210.1016/j.cma.2011.01.011 ↗
62. Wisnom M, Jones M (1996) Measurement of friction in mode II delamination with through thickness compression. In: ECCM-7: seventh European conference on composite materials. Realising their commercial potential, pp 87–92
63. Wriggers P (2006) Computational contact mechanics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-540-32609-0 ↗
64. Xie D, Biggers SB Jr (2006) Progressive crack growth analysis using interface element based on the virtual crack closure technique. Finite Elem Anal Des 42:977–98410.1016/j.finel.2006.03.007 ↗
65. Xie D, Waas AM (2006) Discrete cohesive zone model for mixed-mode fracture using finite element analysis. Eng Fract Mech 73:1783–179610.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.03.006 ↗
66. Xu XP, Needleman A (1993) Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 1:111–13210.1088/0965-0393/1/2/001 ↗
67. Xu YJ, Yuan H (2011) Applications of normal stress dominated cohesive zone models for mixed-mode crack simulation based on extended finite element methods. Eng Fract Mech 78:544–55810.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.029 ↗
68. Yang QD, Cox B (2005) Cohesive models for damage evolution in laminated composites. Int J Fract 133:107–13710.1007/s10704-005-4729-6 ↗
69. Yang QD, Thouless M, Ward S (1999) Numerical simulations of adhesively-bonded beams failing with extensive plastic deformation. J Mech Phys Solids 47:1337–135310.1016/S0022-5096(98)00101-X ↗