journal article·2022-01-31Open access

Predicting Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Therapies with Machine Learning (ML) by Combining Clinical and Patient-Reported Data

Sanna Iivanainen, Jussi Ekström, Henri Virtanen, Vesa V. Kataja, Jussi P. Koivunen

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

ICIs are a standard of care in several malignancies; however, according to overall response rate (ORR), only a subset of eligible patients benefits from ICIs. Thus, an ability to predict ORR could enable more rational use. In this study a ML-based ORR prediction model was built, with patient-reported symptom data and other clinical data as inputs, using the extreme gradient boosting technique (XGBoost). Prediction performance for unseen samples was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV), and the performance was evaluated with accuracy, AUC (area under curve), F1 score, and MCC (Matthew’s correlation coefficient). The ORR prediction model had a promising LOOCV performance with all four metrics: accuracy (75%), AUC (0.71), F1 score (0.58), and MCC (0.4). A rather good sensitivity (0.58) and high specificity (0.82) of the model were seen in the confusion matrix for all 63 LOOCV ORR predictions. The two most important symptoms for predicting the ORR were itching and fatigue. The results show that it is possible to predict ORR for patients with multiple advanced cancers undergoing ICI therapies with a ML model combining clinical, routine laboratory, and patient-reported data even with a limited size cohort.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital and MRC Oulu, 90220 Oulu, Finland

Kaiku Health Oy, 00530 Helsinki, Finland

Funding

Finnis Cancer Society · Emil Aaltonen Foundation · Oulu University · The Finnish Medical Foundation

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer10.1056/NEJMoa1200690 ↗
2. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: Final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006)10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31601-X ↗
3. Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma10.1056/NEJMoa1503093 ↗
4. Safety Profile of Nivolumab Monotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of Patients with Advanced Melanoma10.1200/JCO.2015.66.1389 ↗
5. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer10.1056/NEJMoa1507643 ↗
6. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer10.1056/NEJMoa1504627 ↗
7. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): A randomised controlled trial10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7 ↗
8. Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer10.1056/NEJMoa1606774 ↗
9. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): A phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X ↗
10. Pembrolizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma10.1056/NEJMoa1613683 ↗
11. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma10.1056/NEJMoa1510665 ↗
12. First-line pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer (KEYNOTE-052): A multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30616-2 ↗
13. Novel patterns of response under immunotherapy10.1093/annonc/mdz003 ↗
14. Machine learning predicts individual cancer patient responses to therapeutic drugs with high accuracy10.1038/s41598-018-34753-5 ↗
15. Nguyen, L.C., Naulaerts, S., Bruna, A., Ghislat, G., and Ballester, P.J. (2021). Predicting Cancer Drug Response In Vivo by Learning an Optimal Feature Selection of Tumour Molecular Profiles. Biomedicines, 9.10.3390/biomedicines9101319 ↗
16. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6 ↗
17. Machine Learning Approaches to Predict 6-Month Mortality Among Patients with Cancer10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15997 ↗
18. Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice10.3322/caac.21150 ↗
19. Development of an integrated electronic platform for patient self-report and management of adverse events during cancer treatment10.1093/annonc/mdx317 ↗
20. Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy10.1200/JCO.2005.04.275 ↗
21. Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment10.1001/jama.2017.7156 ↗
22. Improving Survival in Patients Treated for a Lung Cancer Using Self-Evaluated Symptoms Reported Through a Web Application10.1097/COC.0000000000000189 ↗
23. Nivolumab in Resected and Unresectable Metastatic Melanoma: Characteristics of Immune-Related Adverse Events and Association with Outcomes10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1136 ↗
24. Pembrolizumab Cutaneous Adverse Events and Their Association With Disease Progression10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1916 ↗
25. Association of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Toxic Effects With Shared Cancer and Tissue Antigens in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0402 ↗
26. (2019, May 22). Scalable, Portable and Distributed Gradient Boosting (GBDT, GBRT or GBM) Library, for Python, R, Java, Scala, C++ and More. Runs on Single Machine, Hadoop, Spark, Flink and DataFlow: Dmlc/Xgboost. Distributed (Deep) Machine Learning Community. Available online: https://github.com/dmlc/xgboost.
27. ePROs in the follow-up of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective study10.1007/s00432-018-02835-6 ↗
28. Follow-Up of Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool (KISS): Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study10.2196/17898 ↗
29. Predicting Onset and Continuity of Patient-Reported Symptoms in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Therapies Using Machine Learning10.26502/acmcr.96550205 ↗
30. Iivanainen, S., Ekstrom, J., Virtanen, H., Kataja, V.V., and Koivunen, J.P. (2021). Electronic patient-reported outcomes and machine learning in predicting immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 21.10.1186/s12911-021-01564-0 ↗
31. Big data in health care: Using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0041 ↗
32. Dercle, L., Zhao, B., Gönen, M., Moskowitz, C.S., Firas, A., Beylergil, V., Connors, D.E., Yang, H., Lu, L., and Fojo, T. (2022). Early Readout on Overall Survival of Patients with Melanoma Treated With Immunotherapy Using a Novel Imaging Analysis. JAMA Oncol.10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6818 ↗
33. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5948 ↗
34. Predictive biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibition