journal article·2021-09-29Open access

Out-of-Plane Experimental Study of Strengthening Slender Non-Structural Masonry Walls

Martin Klun, David Antolinc, Vlatko Bosiljkov

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 19

Abstract

Non-structural masonry partition walls, which are mainly designed to functionally separate spaces in the buildings and provide physical barriers between rooms, were traditionally built from either solid or hollow clay units or autoclaved aerated concrete blocks. Recent earthquakes have revealed the high vulnerability of these elements, even in the case of low to moderate seismic events. Public buildings (e.g., hospitals and schools) are particularly vulnerable. Due to their greater floor-to-floor heights and the response spectra of floors, the dynamic response of primary structure may provoke significantly higher seismic loads on partition walls. The main goal of the presented experimental study was to investigate the behavior of slender partition walls loaded out-of-plane with a simple and cost-effective approach that may be applied through routine refurbishment works. Eleven full-scale slender non-structural masonry partition walls were built with brickwork and cement–lime mortar. Eight of them were additionally strengthened with different techniques, including glass fiber-reinforcing fabric and low-cost glass fiber-rendering mesh. To evaluate the efficiency of the applied strengthening solutions, out-of-plane quasi-static cyclic experiments were conducted. By applying meshes over the entire surfaces, the resistance was significantly improved with the low-cost approach reaching half of the resistance of the commercially available strengthening system preserving the same displacement capacity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Building materials and conservation · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Jamova 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. Performance-Based Seismic Design of Nonstructural Building Components: The next Frontier of Earthquake Engineering10.1007/s11803-014-0238-9 ↗
2. Taghavi, S., and Miranda, E. (2003). Response Assessment of Nonstructural Building Elements, Stanford University.
3. Performance of Non-Structural Elements in RC Buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 Earthquake10.1007/s10518-010-9205-7 ↗
4. Seismic Performance of Non-Structural Elements during the 2016 Central Italy Earthquake10.1007/s10518-018-0361-5 ↗
5. Ian, R., Selim, G., Armando, M., Giulia, S., Ting, L., Nikola, B., Dimitrios, L., Jorge, A., Igor, T., and Katerina, Z. (Joint Reconnaissance Report (JRR) in StEER-EERI: Petrinja, Croatia December 29, 2020, Mw 6.4 Earthquake, 2021). Joint Reconnaissance Report (JRR) in StEER-EERI: Petrinja, Croatia December 29, 2020, Mw 6.4 Earthquake, Report No. PRJ-2959.
6. Lulić, L., Ožić, K., Kišiček, T., Hafner, I., and Stepinac, M. (2021). Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment—Case Study of the Educational Building after the Zagreb Earthquake. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13116353 ↗
7. Damage Classification of Residential Buildings in Historical Downtown after the ML5.5 Earthquake in Zagreb, Croatia in 202010.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102140 ↗
8. Definition of Seismic Input for Out-of-Plane Response of Masonry Walls: I. Parametric Study10.1080/13632460903456981 ↗
9. Akhoundi, F., Vasconcelos, G., Lourenco, P., and Silva, L.C. (2016, January 23). Out-of-Plane Response of Masonry Infilled RC Frames: Effect of Workmanship and Opening. Proceedings of the 16th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, Padova, Italy.10.1201/b21889-143 ↗
10. Angel, R., Abrams, D.P., Shapiro, D., Uzarski, J., and Webster, M. (1994). Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Masonry Infills, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
11. Out-of-Plane Proof Testing of Masonry Infill Walls10.1016/j.istruc.2018.07.003 ↗
12. Shake-Table Experiment on Reinforced Concrete Structure Containing Masonry Infill Wall10.1002/eqe.612 ↗
13. da Porto, F., Guidi, G., Dalla Benetta, M., and Verlato, N. (2013, January 2–5). Combined In-Plane/Out-of-Plane Experimental Behaviour of Reinforced and Strengthened Infill Masonry Walls. Proceedings of the 12th Canadian Masonry Symposium, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
14. Empirical Prediction of the In-Plane/out-of-Plane Interaction Effects in Clay Brick Unreinforced Masonry Infill Walls10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111438 ↗
15. Bidirectional Behavior of Structural Clay Tile Infilled Frames10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:3(236) ↗
16. Shake Table Tests for the Seismic Assessment of Hollow Brick Internal Partitions10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.044 ↗
17. In Situ Out-of-Plane Testing of As-Built and Retrofitted Unreinforced Masonry Walls10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000960 ↗
18. Construction Details and Observed Earthquake Performance of Unreinforced Clay Brick Masonry Cavity-Walls10.1016/j.istruc.2016.04.004 ↗
19. Damiola, M., Esposito, R., Messali, F., and Rots, J.G. (2018, January 9–11). Quasi-Static Cyclic Two-Way out-of-Plane Bending Tests and Analytical Models Comparison for URM Walls. Proceedings of the 10th International Masonry Conference, Milan, Italy.
20. Doherty, K. (2000). An Investigation of the Weak Links in the Seismic Load Path of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings. [Ph.D. Thesis, Adelaide University, Department of CIvil and Environmental Engineering].
21. Out-of-Plane Bending of Concrete Block Walls10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:1(121) ↗
22. Out-of-Plane Behavior of Reinforced Masonry Walls: Experimental and Numerical Study10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.006 ↗
23. Experimental Response of URM Single Leaf and Cavity Walls in Out-of-Plane Two-Way Bending Generated by Seismic Excitation10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.076 ↗
24. Cyclic Testing of Unreinforced Masonry Walls in Two-Way Bending10.1002/eqe.654 ↗
25. Out-of-Plane Flexural Behavior of Unreinforced Red Brick Walls Strengthened with FRP Composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.019 ↗
26. Out-of-Plane Behaviour of Infill Masonry Panels Strengthened with Composite Materials10.1617/s11527-014-0384-6 ↗
27. Strengthening of Masonry Structures Using Epoxy-Bonded FRP Laminates10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:2(96) ↗
28. Out-of-Plane Behavior of Unreinforced Masonry Brick Walls Strengthened with CFRP Strips10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.058 ↗
29. Field Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Walls Strengthened with Fiber Reinforced Polymer Laminates10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1047) ↗
30. Behavior and Design Aspects of FRP-Strengthened URM Walls under Out-of-Plane Loading10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000695 ↗
31. Load Capacity of Concrete Masonry Block Walls Strengthened with Epoxy-Bonded GFRP Sheets10.1177/0021998305051119 ↗
32. Out-of-Plane Behavior of Surface-Reinforced Masonry Walls10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00024-7 ↗
33. Out-of-Plane Flexural Behaviour of Masonry Wallettes Strengthened Using FRP Composites and Externally Bonded Grids: Comparative Study10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107302 ↗
34. Al-Jaberi, Z., Myers, J., and ElGawady, M. (2016, January 24–26). Flexural Capacity of Out-of-Plane Reinforced Masonry Walls Strengthened with Externally Bonded (EB) FRP. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
35. Bond Behavior of Near-Surface Mounted FRP Strips Bonded to Modern Clay Brick Masonry Prisms: Influence of Strip Orientation and Compression Perpendicular to the Strip10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:3(169) ↗
36. Flexural Behavior of Masonry Walls Strengthened with Composite Fabrics
37. Seismic Retrofit of URM Walls with Fibre Composites
38. Strengthening with FRP Bars of URM Walls Subject to Out-of-Plane Loads10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.047 ↗
39. Cyclic Flexure Tests of Masonry Walls Reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Sheets10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:1(20) ↗
40. Out-of-Plane Behavior of Brick Masonry Walls Strengthened with Fiber Composites
41. Out-of-Plane Behavior of Clay Brick Masonry Walls Retrofitted with Flexible Deep Mounted CFRP Strips10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111448 ↗
42. Out-of-Plane Seismic Retrofitting of Masonry Walls with Textile Reinforced Mortar Composites10.1007/s10518-019-00701-5 ↗
43. Static and Cyclic Out-of-Plane Response of Masonry Walls Strengthened Using Textile-Mortar System10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000128 ↗
44. Textile Reinforced Mortar (TRM) versus FRP as Strengthening Material of URM Walls: Out-of-Plane Cyclic Loading10.1617/s11527-007-9226-0 ↗
45. Furtado, A., Rodrigues, H., Arêde, A., and Varum, H. (2020). Impact of the Textile Mesh on the Efficiency of TRM Strengthening Solutions to Improve the Infill Walls Out-of-Plane Behaviour. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10238745 ↗
46. Out-of-Plane Behavior of URM Walls Strengthened with Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix Composite10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000457 ↗
47. Effectiveness of FRCM Reinforcement Applied to Masonry Walls Subject to Axial Force and Out-Of-Plane Loads Evaluated by Experimental and Numerical Studies10.1080/15583058.2017.1323246 ↗
48. Experimental Assessment of Textile Reinforced Sprayed Mortar Strengthening System for Brickwork Wallettes10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.031 ↗
49. Out-of-Plane Maximum Resisting Bending Moment of Masonry Walls Strengthened with FRCM Composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.054 ↗
50. FRCM Strengthening of Clay Brick Walls for out of Plane Loads10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107050 ↗
51. TRM Reinforced Tuff and Fired Clay Brick Masonry: Experimental and Analytical Investigation on Their in-Plane and out-of-Plane Behavior10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121643 ↗
52. Experimental Assessment of an Innovative Strengthening Material for Brick Masonry Infills10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.012 ↗
53. Diagonal Shear and Out-of-Plane Flexural Strength of Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix–Strengthened Masonry Walletes10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000796 ↗
54. Out-of-Plane Behaviour of Unreinforced Masonry Strengthened Using Ferrocement Overlay10.1617/s11527-014-0390-8 ↗
55. Pseudo-Static Cyclic Loading Comparison of Reinforced Masonry Walls Strengthened with FRCM or NSM FRP10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.043 ↗
56. State-of-the-Art on Strengthening of Masonry Structures with Textile Reinforced Mortar (TRM)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.039 ↗
57. Seismic Collapse Prevention of Non-Structural Infill Masonry Using Eq-Top: An Easy Earthquake Fibre Retrofitting System10.1007/s13369-013-0793-9 ↗
58. The European Committee for Standardization (2015). EN 772-1. Methods of Test for Masonry Units, Part 1: Determination of Compressive Strength, CEN.
59. The European Committee for Standardization (2019). EN 1015-11. Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry, Part 11: Determination of Flexural and Compressive Strength of Hardened Mortar, CEN.
60. The European Committee for Standardization (2005). EN 1052-5. Methods of Test for Masonry, Part 5: Determination of Bond Strength by the Bond Wrench Method, CEN.
61. Flexural Displacement Response of NSM FRP Retrofitted Masonry Walls10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.065 ↗
62. Out-of-Plane Shaking Table Tests on URM Single Leaf and Cavity Walls10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.011 ↗
63. Airbag Testing of Multi-Leaf Unreinforced Masonry Walls Subjected to One-Way Bending10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.006 ↗
64. The European Committee for Standardization (2013). EN 1996-1-1:2005+A1:2012. Eurocode 6: Design of Masonry Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules for Reinforced and Unreinforced Masonry Structures, CEN.
65. Tomaževič, M. (1999). Earthquake-Resistant Design of Masonry Buildings, Imperial College Press.10.1142/9781848160835 ↗
66. Analysis of Hysteretic Response of Glass Infilled Wooden Frames10.3846/13923730.2014.899265 ↗
67. Shear Modulus and Stiffness of Brickwork Masonry: An Experimental Perspective10.12989/sem.2005.20.1.021 ↗
68. PrEN 1998-3: Draft (2019). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings and Bridges, CEN.
69. Review of Out-of-Plane Seismic Assessment Techniques Applied To Existing Masonry Buildings
70. Chopra, A.K. (2007). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall College. [3rd ed.].
71. Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G.M. Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.