Inferring Long-Term Demand of Newly Established Stations for Expansion Areas in Bike Sharing System
Source abstract
Abstract
Research on flourishing public bike-sharing systems has been widely discussed in recent years. In these studies, many existing works focus on accurately predicting individual stations in a short time. This work, therefore, aims to predict long-term bike rental/drop-off demands at given bike station locations in the expansion areas. The real-world bike stations are mainly built-in batches for expansion areas. To address the problem, we propose LDA (Long-Term Demand Advisor), a framework to estimate the long-term characteristics of newly established stations. In LDA, several engineering strategies are proposed to extract discriminative and representative features for long-term demands. Moreover, for original and newly established stations, we propose several feature extraction methods and an algorithm to model the correlations between urban dynamics and long-term demands. Our work is the first to address the long-term demand of new stations, providing the government with a tool to pre-evaluate the bike flow of new stations before deployment; this can avoid wasting resources such as personnel expense or budget. We evaluate real-world data from New York City’s bike-sharing system, and show that our LDA framework outperforms baseline approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Urban Transport and Accessibility · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
Institute of Computer and Communication Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Using the Sustainable Modified Tam and Tpb to Analyze the Effects of Perceived Green Value on Loyalty to a Public Bike System10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.008 ↗
2. Ride On! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy10.1177/1086026614546199 ↗
3. The Sharing Economy Isn’t About Sharing at All
4. Collaborating and Connecting: The Emergence of the Sharing Economy
5. Optimizing the level of service quality of a bike-sharing system10.1016/j.omega.2015.09.007 ↗
6. Kalvapalli, S.P.K., and Chelliah, M. (2019). Analysis and Prediction of City-Scale Transportation System Using XGBOOST Technique. Recent Developments in Machine Learning and Data Analytics, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-1280-9_32 ↗
7. Li, Y., Zheng, Y., Zhang, H., and Chen, L. (2015, January 3–6). Traffic prediction in a bike-sharing system. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/2820783.2820837 ↗
8. Liu, J., Sun, L., Chen, W., and Xiong, H. (2016, January 13–17). Rebalancing bike sharing systems: A multi-source data smart optimization. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939776 ↗
9. Analysis of bike sharing system by clustering: The Vélib’case10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2430 ↗
10. Predicting station-level hourly demand in a large-scale bike-sharing network: A graph convolutional neural network approach10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.011 ↗
11. Liu, J., Sun, L., Li, Q., Ming, J., Liu, Y., and Xiong, H. (2017, January 13–17). Functional zone based hierarchical demand prediction for bike system expansion. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Halifax, NS, Canada.10.1145/3097983.3098180 ↗
12. Long, Y., and Shen, Z. (2015). Discovering functional zones using bus smart card data and points of interest in Beijing. Geospatial Analysis to Support Urban Planning in Beijing, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-19342-7_10 ↗
13. Discovering urban functional zones using latent activity trajectories10.1109/TKDE.2014.2345405 ↗
14. Measurement of Inequality of Incomes10.2307/2223319 ↗
15. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd Acmsigkdd, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
16. Qiu, L.-Y., and He, L.-Y. (2018). Bike Sharing and the Economy, the Environment, and Health-Related Externalities. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10041145 ↗
17. Evaluation of various means of transport for urban areas10.1186/s13705-018-0149-0 ↗
18. Improving the sustainability of integrated transportation system with bike-sharing: A spatial agent-based approach10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.023 ↗
19. Jia, L., Liu, X., and Liu, Y. (2018). Impact of Different Stakeholders of Bike-Sharing Industry on Users’ Intention of Civilized Use of Bike-Sharing. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10051437 ↗
20. Dockless bike-sharing systems: What are the implications?10.1080/01441647.2019.1710306 ↗
21. New Generation of Bike-Sharing Systems in China: Lessons for European Cities
22. Understanding electric bike riders’ intention to violate traffic rules and accident proneness in China10.1016/j.tbs.2020.10.010 ↗
23. Yu, Y., Yi, W., Feng, Y., and Liu, J. (2018, January 3–6). Understanding the Intention to Use Commercial Bike-sharing Systems: An Integration of TAM and TPB. The Sharing Economy. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, Big Island, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2018.082 ↗
24. Bike-sharing or taxi? Modeling the choices of travel mode in Chicago using machine learning10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102479 ↗
25. Nikiforiadis, A., Ayfantopoulou, G., and Stamelou, A. (2020). Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Bike-Sharing Usage: The Case of Thessaloniki, Greece. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12198215 ↗
26. The link between bike sharing and subway use during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case-study of New York’s Citi Bike
27. Optimal pricing and availability strategy of a bike-sharing firm with time-sensitive customers10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.151 ↗
28. Liu, J., Li, Q., Qu, M., Chen, W., Yang, J., Xiong, H., Zhong, H., and Fu, Y. (2015, January 15–17). Station site optimization in bike sharing systems. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Atlantic City, NJ, USA.10.1109/ICDM.2015.99 ↗
29. An optimisation algorithm to establish the location of stations of a mixed fleet biking system: An application to the city of Lisbon10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.769 ↗
30. Research on the station location problem for public bicycle systems under dynamic demand10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.028 ↗
31. Gast, N., Massonnet, G., Reijsbergen, D., and Tribastone, M. (2015, January 18–23). Probabilistic forecasts of bike-sharing systems for journey planning. Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Melbourne, Australia.10.1145/2806416.2806569 ↗
32. Chen, L., Zhang, D., Wang, L., Yang, D., Ma, X., Li, S., Wu, Z., Pan, G., Nguyen, T.M., and Jakubowicz, J. (2016, January 12–16). Dynamic cluster-based over-demand prediction in bike sharing systems. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, Heidelberg, Germany.10.1145/2971648.2971652 ↗
33. Liu, Z., Shen, Y., and Zhu, Y. (2018, January 5–9). Inferring dockless shared bike distribution in new cities. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA.10.1145/3159652.3159708 ↗
34. Singla, A., Santoni, M., Bartók, G., Mukerji, P., Meenen, M., and Krause, A. (2015, January 25–30). Incentivizing users for balancing bike sharing systems. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, TX, USA.10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9251 ↗
35. Understanding bike-sharing systems using data mining: Exploring activity patterns10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.058 ↗
36. A review on bike-sharing: The factors affecting bike-sharing demand10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882 ↗
37. Inventory rebalancing and vehicle routing in bike sharing systems10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.029 ↗
38. Wang, D., Wu, E., and Tan, A.-H. (2018, January 28–31). Analysis of Public Transportation Patterns in a Densely Populated City with Station-based Shared Bikes. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering, Singapore.10.1145/3265689.3265697 ↗
39. Hoang, M.X., Zheng, Y., and Singh, A.K. (November, January 31). FCCF: Forecasting citywide crowd flows based on big data. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Burlingame, CA, USA.
40. Yang, Z., Hu, J., Shu, Y., Cheng, P., Chen, J., and Moscibroda, T. (2016, January 26–30). Mobility modeling and prediction in bike-sharing systems. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, Singapore.10.1145/2906388.2906408 ↗
41. Model-based count series clustering for bike sharing system usage mining: A case study with the Vélib’system of Paris10.1145/2560188 ↗
42. Research on the clustering algorithm of the bicycle stations based on OPTICS10.1002/cpe.4876 ↗
43. Hulot, P., Aloise, D., and Jena, S.D. (2018, January 19–23). Towards station-level demand prediction for effective rebalancing in bike-sharing systems. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, London, UK.10.1145/3219819.3219873 ↗