On Characteristics of Ice Ridges and Icebergs for Design of Ship Hulls in Polar Regions Based on Environmental Design Contours
Source abstract
Abstract
Ice ridges and icebergs generally pose a major threat to both ships and offshore facilities that operate in Polar regions. In many cases these features will govern the structural design loads associated with the Ultimate Limit State (ULS) and the Accidental Limit State (ALS). In general, a large number of load cases must be considered in order to ascertain an adequate structural resistance. Alternatively, conservatively high values of the relevant design parameters can be applied, which implies cost penalties. Accordingly, it is natural to consider methods that can serve to reduce the number of relevant load cases. Based on relevant information about the statistical properties of the parameters that characterize ice ridges and icebergs, the most likely combinations of these parameters for design purposes are highly relevant. On this background, the so-called environmental contour method is applied. Probabilistic models of the key parameters that govern the ship and ice interaction process are introduced. Subsequently, the procedure referred to as inverse reliability methods (IFORM) is applied for identification of the environmental contour. Different forms (i.e., dimensions) of environmental contours are generated to reflect the characteristics of the interaction process. Furthermore, the effect of an increasing correlation between the basic parameters is studied. In addition, the increase of the design parameter values for increasing encounter frequencies is illustrated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7052 Trondheim, Norway
School of Transportation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
Funding
Lloyd's Register Foundation · Norwegian Research Council
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Bergström, M., Leira, B.J., and Kujala, P. (2020). Future Scenarios for Arctic Shipping. Proceedings of the Volume 7: Polar and Arctic Sciences and Technology, ASME International.10.1115/OMAE2020-18166 ↗
2. Hahn, M., Dankowski, H., Ehlers, S., Erceg, S., Rung, T., Huisman, M., Sjöblom, H., Leira, B.J., and Chai, W. (2017, January 25–30). Numerical prediction of ship-ice interaction: A project presentation. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Trondheim, Norway.10.1115/OMAE2017-61814 ↗
3. ISO (2010). ISO 19906: Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries–Arctic Offshore Structures, ISO.
4. Towards mission-based structural design for arctic regions10.1080/09377255.2017.1392073 ↗
5. Probabilistic methods for estimation of the extreme value statistics of ship ice loads10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.11.012 ↗
6. Lensu, M. (2002). Short Term Prediction of Ice Loads Experienced by Ice Going Ships, Helsinki University of Technology.
7. Riska, K. (1987). On the Mechanics of the Ramming Interaction between a Ship and a Massive Ice Floe: Dissertation, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
8. Limit state design and methodologies in ice class rules for ships and standards for Arctic offshore structures10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.09.005 ↗
9. A comparison of stochastic process models for definition of design contours10.1016/j.strusafe.2007.09.006 ↗
10. A numerical solver for coupled dynamic simulation of glacial ice impacts considering hydrody-namic-ice-structure interaction10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108827 ↗
11. DNV GL (2014). Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads (DNV-RP-C205), Det Norske Veritas AS.
12. Development of environmental contours using Nataf dis-tribution model10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.08.008 ↗
13. Winterstein, S.R., Ude, T.C., Cornell, C.A., Bjerager, P., and Haver, S. (1993, January 9–13). Environmental parameters for extreme response: Inverse FORM with omission factors. Proceedings of the ICOSSAR-93, Innsbruck, Austria.
14. Environmental contours based on inverse SORM10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.03.007 ↗
15. Application of principal component analysis (PCA) and improved joint probability distributions to the inverse first-order reliability method (I-FORM) for predicting extreme sea states10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.018 ↗
16. Lu, W., Yu, Z., Van den Berg, M., Dennis, M., Lubbad, R., Hornnes, V., Amdahl, J., Løset, S., and Kim, E. (2021, June 21). Loads, Design and Operations of Floaters in the Arctic (Nord ST20). Available online: https://www.scinapse.io/papers/2905273220.
17. The influence of fluid structure interaction modelling on the dynamic response of ships subject to collision and grounding10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102875 ↗
18. Radhakrishnan, G. (2018). Analysis of Accidental Iceberg Impacts with Large Passenger Vessels and FPSOs. [Master’s Thesis, Aalto University].
19. Madsen, H.O., Krenk, S., and Lind, N.C. (2006). Methods of Structural Safety, Courier Corporation.
20. Environmental contour lines: A method for estimating long term extremes by a short term analysis
21. Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation10.1214/aoms/1177729394 ↗
22. A review of the engineering properties of sea ice10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.10.003 ↗
23. Local pressures for ships in ice: Probabilistic analysis of full-scale line load data10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102822 ↗
24. A comprehensive analysis of the morphology of first-year sea ice ridges10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.05.014 ↗
25. Ni, B.-Y., Chen, Z.-W., Zhong, K., Li, X.-A., and Xue, Y.-Z. (2020). Numerical Simulation of a Polar Ship Moving in Level Ice Based on a One-Way Coupling Method. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8090692 ↗
26. Ship resistance when operating in floating ice floes: A combined CFD&DEM approach10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102817 ↗
27. A numerical method for the prediction of ship performance in level ice10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.11.006 ↗
28. A six-degrees-of-freedom numerical model for level ice–ship interaction10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.03.006 ↗
29. Huisman, M., Janßen, C.F., Rung, T., and Ehlers, S. (July, January 26). Numerical simulation of ship-ice interactions with physics engines under consideration of ice breaking. Proceedings of the 26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Rhodes, Greece.
30. Simulating Ice-Sloping Structure Interactions with the Cohesive Element Method10.1115/1.4026959 ↗
31. Ice loads on inclined marine structures—Virtual experiments on ice failure process evolution10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.09.004 ↗
32. Gong, H. (2021). Discrete-Element Modelling of Ship Interaction with Unconsolidated Ice Ridges: Ridge Resistance and Failure Be-Haviour. [Ph.D. Thesis, Aalto University].
33. Sand, B., and Horrigmoe, G. (1998, January 24–29). Simulations of ice ridge forces on conical structures. Proceedings of the 8th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.
34. Ships Breaking Through Sea Ice Ridges
35. A Moored Arctic Floater in First-Year Sea Ice Ridges10.1115/1.4028814 ↗
36. Kujala, P. (1994). On the statistics of Ice Loads on Ship Hull in the Baltic, Helsinki University of Technology.
37. Review of ridge failure against the confederation bridge10.1016/j.coldregions.2004.10.007 ↗
38. Estimating operability of ships in ridged ice fields10.1016/j.coldregions.2016.12.003 ↗
39. Development of Environmental Contours for Ice Ridge Statistics Applied to Reliability-Based Design of Arctic Ships10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101996 ↗
40. Flexural strength equation for sea ice10.1016/0165-232X(94)90006-X ↗
41. Bonath, V., Patil, A., Fransson, L., and Sand, B. (2013, January 9–13). Laboratory testing of compressive and tensile strength on level ice and ridged ice from Svalbard region. Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, Espoo, Finland.
42. A Statistical Analysis of First-Year Level Ice Uniaxial Compressive Strength in the Svalbard Area10.1115/1.4034526 ↗
43. Samardžija, I., and Høyland, K.V. (2020). Analysis of relationship between level ice draft, ridge frequency and ridge keel draft for use in probabilistic assessment of ice ridge loads on offshore structures. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., submitted.
44. Pritchard, R.S. (1980). A comparison of sonar and laser profiles along corresponding tracks in the Arctic Ocean. Sea Ice Process and Models, Proceedings of the Arctic Ice Dynamics Joint Experiment International Commission on Snow and Ice Symposium, University of Washington Press.
45. On the decay of first-year ice ridges: Measurements and evolution of rubble macroporosity, ridge drilling resistance and consolidated layer strength10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.03.024 ↗
46. Estimation of the uniaxial compressive strength of Arctic sea ice during melt season10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.03.002 ↗
47. Arpiainen, M., and Kiili, R. (2006). Arctic Shuttle Container Link from Alaska US to Europe, Aker Arctic Technology.
48. Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances10.1016/0266-8920(86)90033-0 ↗
49. Haugen, I. (2014). Analysis of Hull Structure Response for a Sevan Arctic Mobile Drilling Unit in Arctic Areas Subjected to Ice Loading. [Master’s Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology].
50. Raghuvanshi, U., and Ehlers, S. (2015). An Assessment of Iceberg Loads for Operations in the North Barents Sea. Proceedings of the Volume 9: Ocean Renewable Energy, ASME International.10.1115/OMAE2015-41483 ↗
51. Environmental factors in iceberg collision risks for floating systems10.1016/0165-232X(95)00013-2 ↗
52. Løset, S., and Onshus, D. (1999, January 6–9). Analysis of speeds of drift ice in the Pechora Sea. Proceedings of the 4th International, Development of the Russian Arctic Offshore (RAO ’99), Saint Petersburg, Russia.
53. Analysis of data from bergy bit impacts using a novel hull-mounted external Impact Panel10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.04.018 ↗
54. On impact mechanics in ship collisions10.1016/S0951-8339(99)00002-7 ↗
55. Impact scenario models for probabilistic risk-based design for ship–ship collision10.1016/j.marstruc.2013.06.006 ↗
56. IMO (2015). International code for ships operating in polar waters (Polar Code). MEPC 68/21/Add.1 Annex 10, International Maritime Organization.
57. Bergström, M. (2017). A Simulation-Based Design Method for Arctic Maritime Transport Systems. [Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology].
58. Bergström, M., Idrissova, S., Farhang, S., Huuhtanen, J., Li, F., Hirdaris, S., Ni, B., and Kujala, P. (2020, January 27–30). Some new insights towards goal-based design of Arctic ships. Proceedings of the 8th Transport Research Arena TRA 2020, Helsinki, Finland.
59. Foo-Nielsen, A.C. (2019). Guidelines for Assessing Ice Operational Risk.
60. Transport Canada (2018). Arctic Ice Regime Shipping System Standard TP 12259 (AIRSS).