Evaluation of Shrimp Waste Valorization Combining Computer-Aided Simulation and Numerical Descriptive Inherent Safety Technique (NuDIST)
Source abstract
Abstract
Nowadays, inherently safer designs are considered as key priorities to prevent or mitigate serious incidents with devastating consequences. The need for process safety assessment during early design phases has motivated the development of several contributions related to computer-aided assessment methodologies to measure the inherent safety of chemical processes. In this work, the large-scale production of chitosan from shrimp wastes was evaluated from a process safety point of view using the numerical descriptive inherent safety technique (NuDIST). To this end, simulation of the chitosan production was performed using Aspen Plus ® to obtain extended mass and energy balances. The assessment of all the chemicals involved within the process was carried out for the following safety parameters: explosivity (EXP), flammability (FL), and toxicity (TOX). The safety assessment of the process included the parameters of temperature (T), pressure (P), and heat of reaction (HR). The maximum chemical safety score was estimated in 171.01 with ethanol as the main contributor to the parameters of explosivity and flammability. The score associated with operating data was calculated at 209.20 and heat of reaction reported to be the most affecting parameter. The NuDIST score was estimated at 380.20. This NuDIST value revealed the low hazards associated with the handling of substances such as shrimp wastes, chitosan, and water, as well as the non-extreme temperature and pressure conditions. In general, the large-scale production of chitosan from shrimp shells was shown to be an inherently safe alternative of waste valorization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Risk and Safety Analysis · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, Materials & Environment, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 00185 Rome, Italy
Chemical Engineering Department, Nanomaterials and Computer Aided Process Engineering Research Group (NIPAC), University of Cartagena, Avenida del Consulado St. 30 #48B-152, 130015 Cartagena de Indias, Colombia
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Recovery of protein, chitin, carotenoids and glycosaminoglycans from Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) processing waste10.1016/j.procbio.2011.12.012 ↗
2. Industrial applications of crustacean by-products (chitin, chitosan, and chitooligosaccharides): A review10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.007 ↗
3. Cabarcas, M., Marimon, W., and Miranda, M. (2011). Diseño de un proceso económico y competitivo para la extracción de quitina y producción de quitosano a partir de exoesqueletos de camarón. [Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad de Cartagena].
4. Chitin and Chitosan: Production and Application of Versatile Biomedical Nanomaterials
5. Chitin and chitosan preparation from shrimp shells Penaeus monodon and its human ovarian cancer cell line, PA-110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.035 ↗
6. Techno-economic Sensitivity Analysis of Large Scale Chitosan Production Process from Shrimp Shell Wastes
7. Production of chitin and chitosan from shrimp shell wastes10.3329/jbau.v14i2.32701 ↗
8. Improvement of chitosan production from Persian Gulf shrimp waste by response surface methodology10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.08.027 ↗
9. Kishimoto, Y., Yoshida, H., and Kondo, K. (2016). Potential Anti-Atherosclerotic Properties of Astaxanthin. Mar. Drugs, 14.10.3390/md14020035 ↗
10. Astaxanthin Production from Haematococcus pluvialis: Effects of Light Wavelength and Salinity10.12988/ces.2017.711196 ↗
11. Safety assessment in development and operation of modular continuous-flow processes10.1039/C7RE00021A ↗
12. Exploring inherent process safety indicators and approaches for their estimation: A systematic review10.1016/j.jlp.2018.01.013 ↗
13. Supporting organizational learning by comparing activities and outcomes of the safety-management system10.1016/j.jlp.2013.04.009 ↗
14. Numerical Descriptive Inherent Safety Technique (NuDIST) for inherent safety assessment in petrochemical industry10.1016/j.psep.2014.03.009 ↗
15. Inherent Safety Assessment of Biodiesel Production: Flammability Parameter10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.622 ↗
16. Economic analysis of a biorefinery process for catechol production from lignin10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.294 ↗
17. Techno-economic evaluation of a combined bioprocess for fermentative hydrogen production from food waste10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.072 ↗
18. Inherent safety assessment of solvent alternatives for palm oil recovery
19. Inherent Safety Assessment Technique for Preliminary Design Stage
20. Comparison of furfural and biogas production using pentoses as platform10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138841 ↗
21. Meramo-Hurtado, S., Alarcón-Suesca, C., and González-Delgado, Á.D. (2020). Exergetic sensibility analysis and environmental evaluation of chitosan production from shrimp exoskeleton in Colombia. J. Clean. Prod., 248.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119285 ↗
22. Bioactive compounds from by-products of shrimp processing industry in Vietnam
23. Comparison of process technologies for chitosan production from shrimp shell waste: A techno-economic approach using Aspen Plus®10.1016/j.fbp.2017.02.010 ↗
24. Process design and economic evaluation of green extraction methods for recovery of astaxanthin from shrimp waste10.1016/j.cherd.2016.10.015 ↗
25. Valorization and extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from north african grass: Ampelodesmos mauritanicus (diss)10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.048 ↗
26. Effect of an enzymatic treatment with cellulase and mannanase on the structural properties of nannochloropsis microalgae10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.062 ↗
27. Sudarni, D.H.A., and Handogo, R. (2016). Process Safety Index in Chemical Process. Int. Semin. Sci. Technol., 10–13.10.12962/j23546026.y2017i2.2271 ↗