journal article·2020-11-24Open access

A Low-Cost Secure IoT Mechanism for Monitoring and Controlling Polygeneration Microgrids

Josué Martínez-Martínez, Diego Aponte-Roa, Idalides Vergara-Laurens, Wayne W. Weaver

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 23

Abstract

The use of Internet-connected devices at homes has increased to monitor energy consumption. Furthermore, renewable energy sources have also increased, reducing electricity bills. However, the high cost of the equipment limits the use of these technologies. This paper presents a low-cost secured-distributed Internet of Things (IoT) system to monitor and control devices connected in a polygeneration microgrid, as a combined power system for local loads with renewable sources. The proposed mechanism includes a Wireless Sensor Actuator Networked Control System that links network nodes using the IEEE 802.15.4 standard. The Internet communication enables the monitor and control of devices using a mobile application to increase the efficiency. In addition, security mechanisms are implemented at several levels including the authentication, encryption, and decryption of the transmitted data. Furthermore, a firewall and a network intrusion detection-and-prevention program are implemented to increase the system protection against cyber-attack. The feasibility of the proposed solution was demonstrated using a DC microgrid test bench consisting of a diverse range of renewable energy sources and loads.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Energy Management · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks · Smart Grid Security and Resilience

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Ana G. Méndez University, Gurabo 00778, Puerto Rico

Mechanical Engineering Department, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA

Funding

Department of Energy, CIESESE Project

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. (2020, April 02). Electric Sales, Revenue, and Average Price—Energy Information Administration, Available online: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/sales_revenue_price/.
2. HEMS Assisted by a Sensor Network Having an Efficient Wireless Power Supply10.1109/TMAG.2012.2228472 ↗
3. Home Energy Management System for Residential Customer: Present Status and Limitation
4. Intelligent DC Homes in Future Sustainable Energy Systems: When efficiency and intelligence work together
5. Economical and Balanced Energy Usage in the Smart Home Infrastructure: A Tutorial and New Results10.1109/TETC.2015.2484839 ↗
6. Salman, L., Salman, S., Jahangirian, S., Abraham, M., German, F., Blair, C., and Krenz, P. (2016, January 12–14). Energy efficient IoT-based smart home. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 3rd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT 2016), Reston, VA, USA.10.1109/WF-IoT.2016.7845449 ↗
7. Towards a definition of the Internet of things (IoT)
8. Mandula, K., Parupalli, R., Murty, C.A.S., Magesh, E., and Lunagariya, R. (2015, January 18–19). Mobile based home automation using Internet of Things (IoT). Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT), Kumaracoil, India.10.1109/ICCICCT.2015.7475301 ↗
9. Dlamini, N.N., and Johnston, K. (2016, January 28–29). The use, benefits and challenges of using the Internet of Things (IoT) in retail businesses: A literature review. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering (ICACCE), Durban, South Africa.10.1109/ICACCE.2016.8073787 ↗
10. Mahmud, S., Ahmed, S., and Shikder, K. (2019, January 10–12). A Smart Home Automation and Metering System using Internet of Things (IoT). Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST), Dhaka, Bangladesh.10.1109/ICREST.2019.8644232 ↗
11. GreenCharge: Managing Renewable Energy in Smart Buildings10.1109/JSAC.2013.130711 ↗
12. Challenges and Benefits of Integrating the Renewable Energy Technologies into the AC Power System Grid
13. Lin, H., and Bergmann, N.W. (2016). IoT Privacy and Security Challenges for Smart Home Environments. Information, 7.10.3390/info7030044 ↗
14. Electric Energy Management in the Smart Home: Perspectives on Enabling Technologies and Consumer Behavior10.1109/JPROC.2013.2270172 ↗
15. Van Dam, S. (2013). Smart Energy Management for Households. [Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology].10.59490/abe.2013.5.743 ↗
16. The U.S. Department of Energy’s Microgrid Initiative10.1016/j.tej.2012.09.013 ↗
17. A review of microgrid development in the United States—A decade of progress on policies, demonstrations, controls, and software tools10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.096 ↗
18. Ward, B., Dan, T., Ross, G., Steve, G., Jason, S., Dhruv, B., and Jim, R. (2020, April 02). The Advanced Microgrid Integration and Interoperability, Available online: https://prod-ng.sandia.gov/techlib-noauth/access-control.cgi/2014/141535.pdf.
19. Bushra, R., and Husain, R.M. (2015). Applications of wireless sensor networks for urban areas: A survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 60.10.1016/j.jnca.2015.09.008 ↗
20. Dargie, W., and Poellabauer, C. (2010). Fundamentals of Wireless Sensor Networks: Theory and Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9780470666388 ↗
21. Song, Z., and Zhou, X. (2013, January 25–27). Research and simulation of wireless sensor and actuator networked control system. Proceedings of the 2013 25th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Guiyang, China.10.1109/CCDC.2013.6561648 ↗
22. Coelho, S., Rozario, R., Sharma, R., and Mehra, M. (2018, January 5). An IOT Based Smart Cubicle System for Effective Power Usage and Employee Monitoring in Offices. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Smart City and Emerging Technology (ICSCET), Mumbai, India.10.1109/ICSCET.2018.8537319 ↗
23. Patchava, V., Kandala, H.B., and Babu, P.R. (2015, January 21–23). A Smart Home Automation technique with Raspberry Pi using IoT. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Smart Sensors and Systems (ICSSS), Bangalore, India.10.1109/SMARTSENS.2015.7873584 ↗
24. Dean, A., and Agyeman, M.O. (2018, January 21–23). A Study of the Advances in IoT Security. Proceedings of the 2018 International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Control (ISCSIC), Stockholm, Sweden.10.1145/3284557.3284560 ↗
25. Medwed, M. (2016, January 28). IoT Security Challenges and Ways Forward. Proceedings of the 2016 6th International Workshop on Trustworthy Embedded Devices, Vienna, Austria.10.1145/2995289.2995298 ↗
26. Rawlinson, K. (2020, April 02). HP Study Reveals 70 Percent of Internet of Things Devices Vulnerable to Attack. Available online: https://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-news/press-release.html?id=1744676.
27. Aponte-Roa, D.A., Martinez, J.B., Fernandez, X.C., and Weaver, W.W. (2019, January 7–9). A Benchtop DC Microgrid for Renewable Energy Sources Integration. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CCWC.2019.8666603 ↗
28. Developing ZigBee deployment guideline under wifi interference for smart grid applications10.1109/TSG.2010.2091655 ↗
29. ESCAPE CAN limitations
30. Advances in automotive digital communications10.1016/j.csi.2004.12.005 ↗
31. Bauer, G., Kopetz, H., and Steiner, W. (2003, January 9–11). The central guardian approach to enforce fault isolation in the time-triggered architecture. Proceedings of the 6th ISADS, Pisa, Italy.
32. Trends in automotive communication systems10.1109/JPROC.2005.849725 ↗
33. Zurawski, R. (2005). Fault tolerant services for safe in-car embedded systems. The Embedded Systems Handbook, CRC.10.1201/9781420038163 ↗
34. Quantitative Comparison of the Error-Containment Capabilities of a Bus and a Star Topology in CAN Networks10.1109/TIE.2009.2036642 ↗
35. Khan, R., Khan, S., Zaheer, R., and Khan, S. (2012, January 17–19). Future Internet: The Internet of Things Architecture, Possible Applications and Key Challenges. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.10.1109/FIT.2012.53 ↗
36. Aman, M.N., Chua, K.C., and Sikdar, B. (2017, January 2–6). Secure Data Provenance for the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the ASIA CCSACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, Abu Dhabi, UAE.10.1145/3055245.3055255 ↗
37. Martínez-Martínez, J., Carvajal-Jiménez, C., and Aponte-Roa, D.A. (2020, January 6–8). A Secured IoT Scheme for Microgrids Monitoring. Proceedings of the 2020 10th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CCWC47524.2020.9031280 ↗
38. Wu, M., Lu, T., Ling, F., Sun, J., and Du, H. (2010, January 20–22). Research on the Architecture of Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE), Chengdu, China.
39. Lim, S., and Yeap, G. (2011, January 5–6). Centralised Smart Home Control System via XBee Transceivers. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research (CHUSER), Penang, Malaysia.
40. (2020, April 02). Metasploit-Penetration Testing Software. Available online: https://www.metasploit.com.
41. (2020, April 02). Low Orbit Ion Cannon (LOIC). Available online: https://www.imperva.com/learn/application-security/low-orbit-ion-cannon/.
42. De Coninck, E., Verbelen, T., Vankeirsbilck, B., Bohez, S., Leroux, S., and Simoens, P. (2015, January 8). DIANNE: Distributed Artificial Neural Networks for the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Middleware for Context-Aware Applications in the IoT, Vancouver, BC, Canada.