Accelerating Emergence of Aerial Swarm
Source abstract
Abstract
Herein, we present a methodology and framework for exploiting certain interdisciplinary studies that can particularly benefit from integration. In this paper, rigorous derivation of control theory and statistical analysis of simulation results are organically unified for testifying and optimizing the emergence of order in aerial swarming scenarios under free boundary conditions. Each Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is regulated by a simplified mathematical model, based on which a distributed flocking protocol is proposed as a feasible solution for aerial swarms. On condition that the initial interaction network is connected, the LaSalle–Krasovskii invariance principle is implemented to verify the effectiveness of the above algorithm. However, most existing results on flocking are far from being engineering applications. A basic challenge is how to present a low-cost energy and time saving solution on account of the limited flight capability of these UAVs and real-time operational requirements. As is well known, energy consumption can be reduced if unnecessary interactions among individuals are eliminated. Therefore, another contribution of this paper is to propose a precise optimization of an existing flocking algorithm for UAVs with respect to interaction requirements. Energy and time measurements, as well as scalability effects, are assessed in terms of statistical significance and strength. The results indicate that the flocking control protocol adopting the minimal interaction is the most promising swarm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems · UAV Applications and Optimization · Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Knowledge Automation for Industrial Processes of Ministry of Education, School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. A survey on aerial swarm robotics10.1109/TRO.2018.2857475 ↗
2. Defining emergence: Learning from flock behavior10.1002/cplx.21711 ↗
3. Swarm robotics: A review from the swarm engineering perspective10.1007/s11721-012-0075-2 ↗
4. Localization and Clustering Based on Swarm Intelligence in UAV Networks for Emergency Communications10.1109/JIOT.2019.2925567 ↗
5. Vasarhelyi, G., Viragh, C., Somorjai, G., Nepusz, T., Eiben, A.E., and Vicsek, T. (2018). Optimized flocking of autonomous drones in confined environments. Sci. Robot., 3.10.1126/scirobotics.aat3536 ↗
6. Distributed formation and reconfiguration control of VTOL UAVs10.1109/TCST.2016.2547952 ↗
7. Distributed control for groups of unmanned aerial vehicles performing surveillance missions and providing relay communication network services
8. Vision-aided multi-UAV autonomous flocking in GPS-denied environment10.1109/TIE.2018.2824766 ↗
9. Distributed aerial processing for IoT-based edge UAV swarms in smart farming10.1016/j.comnet.2019.107038 ↗
10. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays10.1109/TAC.2004.834113 ↗
11. Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: Algorithms and theory10.1109/TAC.2005.864190 ↗
12. Flocking in fixed and switching networks10.1109/TAC.2007.895948 ↗
13. Rendezvous of multiple mobile agents with preserved network connectivity10.1016/j.sysconle.2010.03.006 ↗
14. Leader-follower flocking of multiple robotic fish10.1109/TMECH.2014.2337375 ↗
15. Distributed Constraint Optimization with Flocking Behavior10.1155/2018/1579865 ↗
16. Distributed geodesic control laws for flocking of nonholonomic agents10.1109/TAC.2007.894528 ↗
17. Jing, G., Zheng, Y., and Wang, L. (2014, January 28–30). Group flocking of multiple mobile agents. Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference, Nanjing, China.10.1109/ChiCC.2014.6896791 ↗
18. Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules10.1109/TAC.2003.812781 ↗
19. Leader-follower flocking: Algorithms and experiments10.1109/TCST.2008.2009461 ↗
20. Distributed adaptive flocking of robotic fish system with a leader of bounded unknown input10.1007/s12555-013-0518-6 ↗
21. Jia, Y. (2016, January 13–17). Swarming coordination of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles in three-dimensional space. Proceedings of the AIAA AVIATION Forum: Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Washington, DC, USA.10.2514/6.2016-3678 ↗
22. Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study10.1073/pnas.0711437105 ↗
23. Rybski, P., Larson, A., Lindahl, M., and Gini, M. Performance evaluation of multiple robots in a search and retrieval task. Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Manufacturing Workshop.
24. Rosenfeld, A., Kaminka, G.A., and Kraus, S. (2006). A study of scalability properties in robotic teams. Coordination of Large-scale Multiagent Systems Part 1, Springer.10.1007/0-387-27972-5_2 ↗
25. Timothy, S., and Dario, F. (2010). Energy-time efficiency in aerial swarm deployment. Springer Tracts Adv. Robot., 83.
26. Minimum-time trajectory planning for multi-unmanned-aerial-vehicle cooperation using sequential convex programming10.2514/1.G002349 ↗
27. Three-dimensional trajectory optimization in constrained airspace10.2514/1.39327 ↗
28. Khalil, H.K. (2002). Nonlinear Systems, Prentice-Hall. [3rd ed.].
29. Experimental implementation of distributed flocking algorithm for multiple robotic fish10.1016/j.conengprac.2014.05.004 ↗
30. Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model10.1145/37402.37406 ↗
31. Stability analysis of swarms10.1109/TAC.2003.809765 ↗
32. Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems10.1109/JPROC.2006.887293 ↗