journal article·2020-02-21Open access

Non-Destructive Evaluation of Closure Joints in Accelerated Bridge Construction using a Damage Etiology Approach

Saman Farhangdoust, Armin Mehrabi

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 4

Abstract

In accelerated bridge construction (ABC), prefabricated bridge deck elements are merged using “closure joints.” Because of the cast-in-place nature of closure joints that are expected to go into service rapidly and problems observed for some types of closure joints, there have been some concerns about their long-term durability. This has necessitated the need for monitoring the condition of ABC closure joints using non-destructive testing (NDT) methods. Closure joints contain unique features and details that sets them apart from conventional deck panels. This requires a special treatment of closure joints when it comes to selecting the appropriate NDT technique for their health monitoring. A clear guideline for selecting an applicable NDT method for various types of closure joints has not been developed yet. For this purpose, an investigation was carried out in the Accelerated Bridge Construction University Transportation Center (ABC-UTC) at Florida International University. This paper summarizes the result of this investigation. It includes reviews of all relevant NDT methods for applicability to ABC closure joints and efforts for categorizing closure joints according to joint features that affect the use of NDT. Since the applicability of NDT methods heavily depend on the type of expected anomaly to be detected and its root causes, all potential defects and types of damage were identified and investigated using a damage sequence tree (DST). Consequently, damage etiology for ABC closure joints were established using fault tree analysis (FTA). Finally, a quantitative statistical survey was used to substantiate the selection of the NDT methods that were most applicable to the health monitoring of ABC bridges containing closure joints. The results presented in this paper can be used by bridge owners and consultants as an effective and practical guide for the selection of NDT methods for monitoring the health of ABC closure joints.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Accelerated Bridge Construction University Transportation Center (ABC-UTC), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33174, USA

Funding

U.S. Department of Transportation

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. Mehrabi, A., and Farhangdoust, S. (2019). ABC-UTC Guideline for: Selection of NDT Methods Application to Health Monitoring of ABC Closure Joints, Accelerated Bridge Construction University Transportation Center.10.32548/RS.2018.017 ↗
2. First-generation ABC system, evolving design, and half a century of performance: Michigan side-by-side box-beam bridges10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000526 ↗
3. Terry, W. (2009, January 3). Iowa’s Perspective on ABC. Proceedings of the FHWA ABC Workshop 2009 International Bridge Conference, Seattle, WA, USA.
4. A Laser-Based Noncontact Vibration Technique for Health Monitoring of Structural Cables: Background, Success, and New Developments
5. Culmo, M.P. (2009). Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems.
6. Sutter, L., Peterson, K., Julio-Betancourt, G., Hooton, D., Dam, T.V., and Smith, K. (2008). The Deleterious Chemical Effects of Concentrated Deicing Solutions on Portland Cement Concrete.
7. Gucunski, N., Romero, F., Kruschwitz, S., Feldmann, R., and Parvardeh, H. (2011). Comprehensive Bridge Deck Deterioration Mapping of Nine Bridges by Nondestructive Evaluation Technologies.
8. Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) Research Division (2004). Lessons Learned After Construction: Bridge County Road Over I-80.
9. Hopper, T., Manafpour, A., Warn, G., Rajabipour, F., Morian, D., and Jahangirnejad, S. (2015). Bridge Deck Cracking: Effects on In-Service Performance, Prevention, and Remediation.
10. Aktan, H., Attanayake, U., and Ulku, E. (2009). Condition Assessment and Methods of Abatement of Prestressed Concrete Box-Beam Deterioration—Phase II.
11. Brown, M., Sellers, G., Folliard, K., and Fowler, D. (2001). Restrained Shrinkage Cracking of Concrete Bridge Decks: State-of-the-Art Review, The National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine. Rep. FHWA/TX-0-4098-1.2001.
12. E. & D. MD (2004). Prefabricated Bridge Replacement Report: i-215 East 3760 S. & 3900 S, E. & D. MD. Project No. IBHF-215-9(110)2.
13. Farhangdoust, S., and Mehrabi, A.B. (2019, January 24–27). NDT Inspection of Critical ABC Details to Assure Life Cycle Performance and Avoid Future Unforeseen Excessive Repairs. Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1061/9780784482230.023 ↗
14. Farhangdoust, S., Mehrabi, A.B., and Al Mosawi, S.F. (2018, January 26–29). NDT Methods Applicable to Health Monitoring of ABC Closure Joints. Proceedings of the 27th Research Symposium–The American Society for Non-destructive Testing (ASNT), Orlando, FL, USA.10.32548/RS.2018.017 ↗
15. Rettner, D.L., Fiegen, M.S., Snyder, M.B., and MacDonald, K.A. (2014). Analysis of Bridge Deck Cracking Data a Review of Mechanisms, Analysis of MnDOT Bridge Construction Data, and Recommendation for Treatment and Prevention, The National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine. Rep.MN/RC 2014-09.
16. Severity analysis for large truck rollover crashes using a random parameter ordered logit model10.1016/j.aap.2019.105355 ↗
17. Hasanian, M., Choi, S., and Lissenden, C. (2018, January 26). Laser Ultrasonics for Remote Detection of Stress Corrosion Cracking in Harsh Environments. Proceedings of the 27th ASNT Research Symposium, Orlando, FL, USA.10.32548/RS.2018.014 ↗
18. Health Monitoring of Closure Joints in Accelerated Bridge Construction: A Review of Non-Destructive Testing Application10.3151/jact.17.381 ↗
19. Sun, H., Pashoutani, S., and Zhu, J. (2018). Nondestructive Evaluation of Concrete Bridge Decks with Automated Acoustic Scanning System and Ground Penetrating Radar. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18061955 ↗
20. Laboratory assessment of nine methods for nondestructive evaluation of concrete bridge decks with overlays10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.127 ↗
21. The nondestructive impulse response test in North America: 1985–200110.1016/S0963-8695(02)00065-8 ↗
22. Effects of environmental variables on infrared imaging of subsurface features of concrete bridges10.3141/2108-12 ↗
23. Nondestructive evaluation of concrete infrastructure with ground penetrating radar10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(287) ↗
24. Condition assessment of concrete structures using a new analysis method: Ground-penetrating radar computer-assisted visual interpretation10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.026 ↗
25. GIMA ground penetrating radar system for monitoring concrete bridge decks10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00053-1 ↗
26. No, T.C.S. (2002). Guidebook on Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete Structures, International Atomic Energy Agency.
27. A comparison of nondestructive evaluation methods for bridge deck assessment10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00061-0 ↗
28. Nondestructive evaluation for bridge management in the next century
29. Detection of common defects in concrete bridge decks using nondestructive evaluation techniques10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:2(215) ↗
30. Comparison of NDT methods for assessment of a concrete bridge deck10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000441 ↗
31. Ability of the direct wave of radar ground-coupled antenna for NDT of concrete structures10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.11.003 ↗
32. Imaging of concrete structures10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00012-7 ↗
33. NDT in civil engineering: The case of concrete bridge decks
34. Improved concrete bridge deck evaluation using GPR by accounting for signal depth–amplitude effects10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.03.005 ↗
35. Integrated health assessment strategy using NDT for reinforced concrete bridges10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.10.001 ↗
36. Results of reconstructed and fused NDT-data measured in the laboratory and on-site at bridges10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.02.005 ↗
37. Rhazi, J., Dous, O., and Laurens, S. (, January December). A new application of the GPR technique to reinforced concrete bridge decks. Proceedings of the 4th Middle East NDT Conference and Exhibition, Manama, Bahrain.
38. Rhazi, J., Dous, O., Ballivy, G., Laurens, S., and Balayssac, J.P. (2003, January 16–19). Non destructive health evaluation of concrete bridge decks by GPR and half cell potential techniques. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering, Berlin, Germany.
39. Evaluation of radar and complementary echo methods for NDT of concrete elements10.1007/s10921-008-0030-8 ↗
40. Combining multiple NDT methods to improve testing effectiveness10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.01.011 ↗
41. Ultrasonic imaging of concrete members using an array system10.1016/S0963-8695(01)00007-X ↗
42. Segmentation of thermal images for non-destructive evaluation of bridge decks10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.12.003 ↗
43. Multiple complementary nondestructive evaluation technologies for condition assessment of concrete bridge decks10.3141/2201-05 ↗
44. Arndt, R., and Jalinoos, F. (July, January 30). NDE for corrosion detection in reinforced concrete structures–a benchmark approach. Proceedings of the Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDTCE’09), Nantes, France.
45. Mehrabi, A., and Farhangdoust, S. (2019). NDT Methods Applicable to Health Monitoring of ABC Closure Joints, Accelerated Bridge Construction University Transportation Center (ABC-UTC). No. ABC-UTC-2013-C3-FIU04.10.32548/RS.2018.017 ↗
46. Sub-surface radar testing of concrete: A review10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00093-X ↗
47. Akhtar, S. (2013). Review of nondestructive testing methods for condition monitoring of concrete structures. J. Constr. Eng., 2013.10.1155/2013/834572 ↗
48. Nondestructive test methods for concrete bridges: A review10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.011 ↗
49. SQUID array for magnetic inspection of prestressed concrete bridges10.1016/S0921-4534(01)01145-5 ↗
50. Model based evaluation of bridge decks using ground penetrating radar10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00516.x ↗
51. Bungey, J.H., and Grantham, M.G. (2014). Testing of Concrete in Structures, CRC Press.
52. Applications of ground penetrating radar (GPR) in bridge deck monitoring and assessment10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.04.009 ↗
53. Zhu, J. (2008). Non-Contact NDT of Concrete Structures Using Air Coupled Sensors, Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
54. Remote sensing of concrete bridge decks using unmanned aerial vehicle infrared thermography10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.024 ↗
55. Implementation of a fully autonomous platform for assessment of concrete bridge decks RABIT
56. Delamination and concrete quality assessment of concrete bridge decks using a fully autonomous RABIT platform
57. Van der Wielen, A., Courard, L., and Nguyen, F. (2010, January 21–25). Nondestructive detection of delaminations in concrete bridge decks. Proceedings of the XIII Internarional Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Lecce, Italy.10.1109/ICGPR.2010.5550250 ↗
58. Detection of delamination in concrete bridge decks by joint amplitude and phase analysis of ultrasonic array measurements10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000513 ↗
59. Developments for the non-destructive evaluation of highway bridges in the USA10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00009-7 ↗
60. Integration of bridge management systems and nondestructive evaluations10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1998)4:2(49) ↗
61. Bridge management and nondestructive evaluation10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:1(3) ↗
62. Concrete bridge deck condition assessment with automated multisensor techniques10.1080/15732479.2010.501542 ↗
63. Principles of thermography and radar for bridge deck assessment10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1990)116:5(583) ↗
64. Ultrasonic wave velocity signal interpretation of simulated concrete bridge decks10.1007/BF02479416 ↗
65. Evaluation of commercially available remote sensors for highway bridge condition assessment10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000303 ↗
66. Xu, Y., and Turkan, Y. (2019). Bridge Inspection Using Bridge Information Modeling (BrIM) and Unmanned Aerial System (UAS). Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-00220-6_74 ↗
67. UAV Bridge Inspection through Evaluated 3D Reconstructions10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001343 ↗
68. Applications of robotics in test and inspection10.1108/IR-01-2018-0012 ↗