journal article·2020-01-15Open access

Questionnaires or Inner Feelings: Who Measures the Engagement Better?

Francesca Nonis, Elena Carlotta Olivetti, Federica Marcolin, Maria Grazia Violante, Enrico Vezzetti, Sandro Moos

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 2

Abstract

This work proposes an innovative method for evaluating users’ engagement, combining the User Engagement Scale (UES) questionnaire and a facial expression recognition (FER) system, active research topics of increasing interest in the human–computer interaction domain (HCI). The subject of the study is a 3D simulator that reproduces a virtual FabLab in which users can approach and learn 3D modeling software and 3D printing. During the interaction with the virtual environment, a structured-light camera acquires the face of the participant in real-time, to catch its spontaneous reactions and compare them with the answers to the UES closed-ended questions. FER methods allow overcoming some intrinsic limits in the adoption of questioning methods, such as the non-sincerity of the interviewees and the lack of correspondence with facial expressions and body language. A convolutional neural network (CNN) has been trained on the Bosphorus database (DB) to perform expression recognition and the classification of the video frames in three classes of engagement (deactivation, average activation, and activation) according to the model of emotion developed by Russell. The results show that the two methodologies can be integrated to evaluate user engagement, to combine weighted answers and spontaneous reactions and to increase knowledge for the design of the new product or service.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Emotion and Mood Recognition · Color perception and design · Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy

Funding

Erasmus+

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement10.1002/asi.21229 ↗
2. Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation10.1017/S0266462307051677 ↗
3. (2019, December 20). User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780367807320.
4. Human-centered design considered harmful10.1145/1070960.1070976 ↗
5. (2019, December 20). Benefits of Co-Design in Service Design Projects. Available online: http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/890.
6. Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., and Paris, A. (2005). School Engagement. What Do Children Need to Flourish: Conceptualizing and Measuring Indicators of Positive Development, Springer Science + Business Media.
7. A standard reference model for intelligent multimedia presentation systems10.1016/S0920-5489(97)00013-5 ↗
8. Best Practices in Increasing Academic Learning Time
9. Design and implementation of 3D Web-based interactive medical devices for educational purposes10.1007/s12008-015-0277-0 ↗
10. Virtual Interactive e-Learning Application: An Evaluation of the Student Satisfaction10.1002/cae.21580 ↗
11. Implementing a new approach for the design of an e-learning platform in engineering education10.1002/cae.21564 ↗
12. Lalmas, M., O’Brien, H., and Yom-Tov, E. (2014). Measuring User Engagement; Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, Morgan Claypool.10.1007/978-3-031-02289-0 ↗
13. The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations10.1002/ir.283 ↗
14. The ABCs of Student Engagement10.1177/003172171409500806 ↗
15. EEG correlates of task engagement and mental workload in vigilance, learning, and memory tasks
16. Psychological correlates of blood pressure: A closer examination of hostility, anxiety, and engagement10.1097/00006199-198205000-00004 ↗
17. Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.001 ↗
18. Improving Student Engagement
19. Classroom engagement evaluation using computer vision techniques
20. Chanel, G., Rebetez, C., Bétrancourt, M., and Pun, T. (2008, January 7). Boredom, Engagement and Anxiety as Indicators for Adaptation to Difficulty in Games. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Entertainment and Media in the Ubiquitous Era, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/1457199.1457203 ↗
21. Latulipe, C., Carroll, E.A., and Lottridge, D. (2011, January 7–12). Love, Hate, Arousal and Engagement: Exploring Audience Responses to Performing Arts. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1145/1978942.1979210 ↗
22. Nonis, F., Dagnes, N., Marcolin, F., and Vezzetti, E. (2019). 3D Approaches and Challenges in Facial Expression Recognition Algorithms—A Literature Review. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183904 ↗
23. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion10.1037/h0030377 ↗
24. Li, S., and Deng, W. (2018). Deep Facial Expression Recognition: A Survey. arXiv.
25. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
26. A circumplex model of affect10.1037/h0077714 ↗
27. Panigrahi, B.K., Trivedi, M.C., Mishra, K.K., Tiwari, S., and Singh, P.K. (2019). 3D Face Recognition Method Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network. Smart Innovations in Communication and Computational Sciences, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-8968-8 ↗
28. Mollahosseini, A., Chan, D., and Mahoor, M.H. (2016, January 7–10). Going deeper in facial expression recognition using deep neural networks. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Lake Placid, NY, USA.10.1109/WACV.2016.7477450 ↗
29. Schouten, B., Juul, N.C., Drygajlo, A., and Tistarelli, M. (2008). Bosphorus Database for 3D Face Analysis. Biometrics and Identity Management, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-89991-4 ↗
30. Esposito, A., Faundez-Zanuy, M., Morabito, F.C., and Pasero, E. (2020). Assessing Discriminating Capability of Geometrical Descriptors for 3D Face Recognition by Using the GH-EXIN Neural Network. Neural Approaches to Dynamics of Signal Exchanges, Springer. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies.10.1007/978-981-13-8950-4 ↗
31. Novel descriptors for geometrical 3D face analysis10.1007/s11042-016-3741-3 ↗
32. Rizzi, C., Andrisano, A.O., Leali, F., Gherardini, F., Pini, F., and Vergnano, A. (2020). Deep CNN for 3D Face Recognition. Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-31154-4 ↗
33. 3D face recognition: An automatic strategy based on geometrical descriptors and landmarks10.1016/j.robot.2014.07.009 ↗
34. 3D geometry-based face recognition in presence of eye and mouth occlusions10.1007/s12008-019-00582-7 ↗
35. Examining the generalizability of the User Engagement Scale (UES) in exploratory search10.1016/j.ipm.2012.08.005 ↗
36. A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004 ↗
37. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests10.1007/BF02310555 ↗
38. DeVellis, R.F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications, SAGE Publications.
39. Evans, J.D. (1996). Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences.
40. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.-C. (2018, January 18–23). MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
41. Perez, L., and Wang, J. (2017). The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learning. arXiv.
42. Likert Scale: Explored and Explained10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975 ↗
43. Carlotta Olivetti, E., Violante, M.G., Vezzetti, E., Marcolin, F., and Eynard, B. (2019). Eynard Engagement Evaluation in a Virtual Learning Environment via Facial Expression Recognition and Self-Reports: A Preliminary Approach. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10010314 ↗