journal article·2019-12-12Open access

Child’s Target Height Prediction Evolution

João Rala Cordeiro, Octavian Postolache, João C. Ferreira

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 24

Abstract

This study is a contribution for the improvement of healthcare in children and in society generally. This study aims to predict children’s height when they become adults, also known as “target height”, to allow for a better growth assessment and more personalized healthcare. The existing literature describes some existing prediction methods, based on longitudinal population studies and statistical techniques, which with few information resources, are able to produce acceptable results. The challenge of this study is in using a new approach based on machine learning to forecast the target height for children and (eventually) improve the existing height prediction accuracy. The goals of the study were achieved. The extreme gradient boosting regression (XGB) and light gradient boosting machine regression (LightGBM) algorithms achieved considerably better results on the height prediction. The developed model can be usefully applied by pediatricians and other clinical professionals in growth assessment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Child Nutrition and Water Access · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Birth, Development, and Health

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Instituto de Telecomunicações, IT-IUL, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, ISCTE-IUL, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal

INOV INESC Inovação—Instituto de Novas Tecnologias, 1000-029 Lisbon, Portugal

Instituto Superior Técnico, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal

ISTAR-IUL, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal

Centro ALGORITMI, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal

Funding

CIT

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Worldwide implementation of the WHO Child Growth Standards10.1017/S136898001200105X ↗
2. Maternal and child undernutrition. Consequences for adult health and human capital10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61692-4 ↗
3. The WHO growth standards: Strengths and limitations10.1097/MCO.0b013e3283511478 ↗
4. Growth as a Mirror of the Condition of Society: Secular Trends and Class Distinctions10.1111/j.1442-200X.1987.tb00015.x ↗
5. Normal growth and techniques of growth assessment10.1016/S0300-595X(86)80005-6 ↗
6. Physical growth and development10.1002/ajpa.1330100215 ↗
7. Impact of New WHO Growth Standards on the Prevalence of Acute Malnutrition and Operations of Feeding Programs-Darfur, Sudan
8. Operational implications of using 2006 World Health Organization growth standards in nutrition programmes: Secondary data analysis10.1136/bmj.39101.664109.AE ↗
9. World Health Organization (2006). WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/Height-for-Age, Weight-for-Age, Weight-for-Length, Weight-for-Height and Body Mass Index-for-Age: Methods and Development, WHO.
10. Limitations of the Current World Health Organization Growth References for Children and Adolescents10.1177/15648265060274S502 ↗
11. Construction of the World Health Organization child growth standards: Selection of methods for attained growth curves10.1002/sim.2227 ↗
12. World Health Organization (2003). The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS), WHO.
13. Should the UK use WHO growth charts?10.1016/j.paed.2009.11.001 ↗
14. Personalized medicine in children with asthma
15. Balancing personalized medicine and personalized care10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182806345 ↗
16. Personalized Medicine: Progress and Promise10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101446 ↗
17. Prediction of Adult Stature10.2307/1125715 ↗
18. Standards for children’s height at ages 2–9 years allowing for heights of parents10.1136/adc.45.244.755 ↗
19. The strengths and limitations of parental heights as a predictor of attained height10.1136/adc.81.3.257 ↗
20. A chart to predict adult height from a child’s current height10.3109/03014460.2011.598189 ↗
21. Prediction of adult height from height, bone age, and occurrence of menarche, at ages 4 to 16 with allowance for midparent height10.1136/adc.50.1.14 ↗
22. Prediction of adult height from height and bone age in childhood: A new system of equations (TW Mark II) based on a sample including very tall and very short children10.1136/adc.58.10.767 ↗
23. DMME: Data Mining Methodology for Engineering Applications-A Holistic Extension to the CRISP-DM Model10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.106 ↗
24. A survey of data mining and knowledge discovery process models and methodologies10.1017/S0269888910000032 ↗
25. Moro, S., Laureano, R., and Cortez, P. (2011, January 24–26). Using Data Mining for Bank Direct Marketing: An Application of the CRISP-DM Methodology. Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference, Guimaraes, Portugal.
26. Chapman, P., Clinton, J., Kerber, R., Khabaza, T., Reinartz, T., Shearer, C., and Wirth, R. (2000). CRISP-DM 1.0: Step-by-Step Data Mining Guide, SPSS.
27. Caetano, N., Cortez, P., and Laureano, R.M. (2015). Using Data Mining for Prediction of Hospital Length of Stay: An Application of the CRISP-DM Methodology, Springer. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.10.1007/978-3-319-22348-3_9 ↗
28. (2019, September 10). CRISP-DM by Smart Vision Europe-DM Methodology. Available online: http://crisp-dm.eu/home/crisp-dm-methodology/.
29. Pllana, S., Janciak, I., Brezany, P., and Wohrer, A. (2011, January 7–9). A Survey of the State of the Art in Data Mining and Integration Query Languages. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems, Tirana, Albania.10.1109/NBiS.2011.58 ↗
30. A Review on Evaluation Metrics for Data Classification Evaluations10.5121/ijdkp.2015.5201 ↗
31. Flach, P. (2003, January 21–24). The Geometry of ROC Space: Understanding Machine Learning Metrics through ROC Isometrics. Proceedings of the ICML03, Washington, DC, USA.
32. Sokolova, M., Japkowicz, N., and Szpakowicz, S. (2006). Beyond Accuracy, F-Score and ROC: A Family of Discriminant Measures for Performance Evaluation. AI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.10.1007/11941439_114 ↗
33. Namlı, E., Erdal, H., and Erdal, H.I. (2019). Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction Models for Energy Performance of Residential Buildings. Recycling and Reuse Approaches for Better Sustainability, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-95888-0_12 ↗
34. Galton’s Bend: A Previously Undiscovered Nonlinearity in Galton’s Family Stature Regression Data10.1198/0003130031874 ↗
35. Understanding Relationships Using Copulas10.1080/10920277.1998.10595667 ↗
36. Chadha, A.N., Zaveri, M.A., and Sarvaiya, J.N. (2016, January 6–8). Optimal feature extraction and selection techniques for speech processing: A review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP), Melmaruvathur, India.10.1109/ICCSP.2016.7754447 ↗
37. Tang, J., Alelyani, S., and Liu, H. (2014). Feature Selection for Classification: A Review. Data Classification: Algorithms and Applications, CRC Press.
38. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics10.1093/bioinformatics/btm344 ↗
39. Top 10 Algorithms in Data Mining10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2 ↗
40. Orzechowski, P., La Cava, W., and Moore, J.H. (2018, January 15–19). Where Are We Now?: A Large Benchmark Study of Recent Symbolic Regression Methods. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Kyoto, Japan.10.1145/3205455.3205539 ↗
41. Support Vector Machines for classification and regression10.1039/B918972F ↗
42. Support Vector Regression Machines
43. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., and Ma, W. (2017, January 4–9). LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
44. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
45. Comparison between XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost Using a Home Credit Dataset
46. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.I. (2017, January 4–9). A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
47. Lundberg, S.M., Erion, G.G., and Lee, S.I. (2018). Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensembles. arXiv.