journal article·2019-11-21Open access

A Feasibility Study for Using Fishnet to Protect Offshore Wind Turbine Monopile Foundations from Damage by Scouring

Bo Yang, Kexiang Wei, Wenxian Yang, Tieying Li, Bo Qin, Liwei Ning

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 23

Abstract

Offshore wind turbine monopile foundations are subjected to complex wind, wave, and flow coupling effects, which result in seabed scouring around the monopile. The consequent scour pits threaten the reliability, safety, and load-carrying capacity of the monopile. In order to develop a cost-effective measure to mitigate such an issue, a new countermeasure device, named “fishnet”, is studied in this paper using a combined approach of numerical simulations and experimental tests. In the research, the size of the fishnet, diameter of the fishnet thread, and the installation height of the fishnet were optimized in order to achieve the best protection to the monopile foundation. In the paper, both numerical simulations and laboratory tests proved the effectiveness of the proposed “fishnet” in reducing the scour around the wind turbine monopile foundations. Moreover, its contribution to erosion reduction can be further enhanced via optimization. It was found that, after optimization, the maximum shear force on the seabed could be reduced by 14% in the numerical study, and the maximum depth of the scour pit could be reduced by 38.2% in laboratory tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes · Hydraulic flow and structures · Soil erosion and sediment transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hunan Institute of Engineering, Xiangtan 411104, China

Hunan Province Engineering Laboratory of Wind Power Operation, Maintenance and Testing Technology, Xiangtan 411104, China

School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK

Funding

Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Prospects of Floating Wind Energy10.17736/ijope.2016.jcr46 ↗
2. Parametric CAPEX, OPEX, and LCOE expressions for offshore wind farms based on global deployment parameters10.1080/15567249.2018.1461150 ↗
3. Yang, W., and Tian, W. (2018). Concept Research of a Countermeasure Device for Preventing Scour around the Monopile Foundations of Offshore Wind Turbines. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11102593 ↗
4. Mechanics of riprap failure at bridge piers10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1995)121:9(635) ↗
5. Validation of the dynamic wake meander model for loads and power production in the Egmond aan Zee wind farm10.1002/we.1563 ↗
6. Evaluation of flow-altering countermeasures against bridge pier scour10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000512 ↗
7. Effect of local and global scour on lateral response of single piles in different soil conditions10.4236/eng.2012.46039 ↗
8. Protecting bridge piers with loose rock riprap10.1080/23249676.2013.828486 ↗
9. Use of sacrificial piles as pier scour countermeasures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:11(1221) ↗
10. Experimental study on local scouring at pile-supported piers
11. Application of collar to control scouring around rectangular bridge piers10.1080/00221686.2004.9641188 ↗
12. Use of sacrificial embankments to minimize bridge damage from scour during extreme flow events10.1007/s11069-017-2829-z ↗
13. Scour mitigation at bridge piers using sacrificial piles
14. Khassaf, S.I., and Obied, N.A. (2018). Experimental Study: Bridge Pier Protection against Local Scour Using Guide Panels, IOP Publishing.10.1088/1757-899X/433/1/012006 ↗
15. Reduction of local scour around bridge piers using slots and collars10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:12(1302) ↗
16. Effectiveness of combinations of raft foundation with aprons as a protection measure against bridge pier scour10.1007/s12046-018-0784-3 ↗
17. Whitehouse, R.J.S., Brown, A., Audenaert, S., Bolle, A., de Schoesitter, P., Haerens, P., Baelus, L., Troch, P.A., das Neves, L., and Ferradosa, T. (2014, January 2–4). Optimising scour protection stability at offshore foundations. In Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, Perth, Australia.10.1201/b17703-79 ↗
18. Riprap sizing for scour protection at river confluence
19. Parametric study of riprap failure around bridge piers10.1080/00221680109499803 ↗
20. Grüne, J., Sparboom, U., Schmidt-Koppenhagen, R., Wang, Z., and Oumeraci, H. (2007). Stability tests of geotextile sand containers for monopile scour protection. Coastal Engineering 2006: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference (In Volumes 5), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd.10.1142/9789812709554_0426 ↗
21. Control of scour at vertical circular piles under waves and current10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:3(270) ↗
22. Flow-altering countermeasures against scour at bridge piers: A review10.1080/00221686.2010.491645 ↗
23. Soulsby, R. (1997). Dynamics of Marine Sands: A Manual for Practical Applications, Thomas Telford.
24. (2019, July 02). Ansys-Fluent Theory Guide. Available online: 6Hhttps://www.pdfdrive.com/ansys-fluent-theory-guide-d7803205.html.
25. Hunt, J.C.R., Wray, A.A., and Moin, P. (July, January 27). Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Proceedings of the 1988 Summer Program, NASA Ames, Stanford, CA, USA.