journal article·2019-11-06Open access

Design Methodology for Soft Wearable Devices—The MOSAR Case

Juana-Mariel Dávila-Vilchis, LAZ-Avilés, Juan Carlos Ávila Vilchis, Adriana H. Vilchis-González

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 22

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodology from the conception to the manufacture of soft wearable devices (SWD). This methodology seeks to unify medical, therapeutic and engineering guidelines for research, development and innovation. The aforementioned methodology is divided into two stages (A and B) and four phases. Stage A only includes phase 1 to identify the main necessity for a patient that will define the target of its associated device. Stage B encompasses phases 2, 3 and 4. The development of three models (virtual, mathematical and experimental physical) of the required device is addressed in phase 2. Phase 3 concerns the control and manufacture of the experimental physical model (EPM). Phase 4 focuses on the EPM experimental validation. As a result of this methodology, 13 mobility, 11 usability and 3 control iterative design criteria for SWD are reported. Moreover, more than 50 products are provided on a technological platform with modular architectures that facilitate SWD diversification. A case study related to a soft mobilizer for upper limb rehabilitation is reported. Nevertheless, this methodology can be implemented in different areas and accelerates the transition from development to innovation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Muscle activation and electromyography studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, 50130 Toluca, Mexico

Cátedras CONACYT, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, 50130 Toluca, Mexico

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Biomedical applications of soft robotics10.1038/s41578-018-0022-y ↗
2. Sof Robotics with Compliance and Adaptation for Biomedical Applications and forthcoming Challenges
3. Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.014 ↗
4. A biologically inspired soft exosuit for walking assistance10.1177/0278364914562476 ↗
5. A soft robotic exosuit improves walking in patients after stroke10.1126/scitranslmed.aai9084 ↗
6. Park, Y.-L., Santos, J., Galloway, K.C., Goldfield, E.C., and Wood, R.J. (June, January 31). A soft wearable robotic device for active knee motions using flat pneumatic artificial muscles. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China.10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907562 ↗
7. A Soft-Inflatable Exosuit for Knee Rehabilitation: Assisting Swing Phase During Walking10.3389/frobt.2018.00044 ↗
8. O’Neill, C.T., Phipps, N.S., Cappello, L., Paganoni, S., and Walsh, C.J. (2017, January 17–20). A soft wearable robot for the shoulder: Design, characterization, and preliminary testing. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitaton Robotics (ICORR), London, UK.10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009488 ↗
9. Natividad, R.F., and Yeow, C.H. (2016, January 26–29). Development of a soft robotic shoulder assistive device for shoulder abduction. Proceedings of the 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Singapore.10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523758 ↗
10. Design of a Soft Robotic Elbow Sleeve with Passive and Intent-Controlled Actuation10.3389/fnins.2017.00597 ↗
11. Oguntosin, V., Harwin, W.S., Kawamura, S., Nasuto, S.J., and Hayashi, Y. (2015, January 11–14). Development of a wearable assistive soft robotic device for elbow rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 2015 ICORR 11th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Singapore.10.1109/ICORR.2015.7281291 ↗
12. A Soft Robotic Orthosis for Wrist Rehabilitation10.1115/1.4030554 ↗
13. Park, S., Yi, J., Kim, D., Lee, Y., Koo, H.S., and Park, Y. (2019, January 14–18). A Lightweight, Soft Wearable Sleeve for Rehabilitation of Forearm Pronation and Supination. Proceedings of the 2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), Seoul, Korea.10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2019.8722783 ↗
14. Effects of digital smart glove system on motor recovery of upper extremity in subacute stroke patients10.1016/j.rehab.2018.05.061 ↗
15. Soft robotic devices for hand rehabilitation and assistance: A narrative review10.1186/s12984-018-0350-6 ↗
16. Shahid, T., Gouwanda, D., Nurzaman, S.G., and Gopalai, A. (2018). Moving toward Soft Robotics: A Decade Review of the Design of Hand Exoskeletons. Biomimetics, 3.10.3390/biomimetics3030017 ↗
17. Boyraz, P., Runge, G., and Raatz, A. (2018). An Overview of Novel Actuators for Soft Robotics. Actuators, 7.10.20944/preprints201806.0172.v1 ↗
18. Towards compliant and wearable robotic orthoses: A review of current and emerging actuator technologies10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.01.010 ↗
19. Soft Material Characterization for Robotic Applications10.1089/soro.2015.0002 ↗
20. Robotic Glove with Soft-Elastic Composite Actuators for Assisting Activities of Daily Living10.1089/soro.2017.0125 ↗
21. A Bioinspired Soft Actuated Material10.1002/adma.201304018 ↗
22. Evolution of 3D printed soft actuators10.1016/j.sna.2016.09.028 ↗
23. 3D printing of soft robotic systems
24. Dávila-Vilchis, J.M., Vilchis-González, A.H., Ávila-Vilchis, J.C., and Zúniga-Avilés, L.A. Desing criteria of Soft Exo Gloves for Hand Rehabilitation and Assistance Tasks: A Review, (manuscript in preparation).
25. Product platform design: Method and application10.1007/s001630100002 ↗
26. Analyzing module commonality for platform design using dendrograms10.1007/s00163-008-0044-3 ↗
27. Meyer, M.H., and Lehnerd, A.P. (1997). The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership, Free Press. [1st ed.].
28. Zuniga-Aviles, L.A., Pedraza, J.C., Gorrostieta, E., and Ramos, J.M. (October, January 28). New Approach to Modeling and Simulation Methodology for the Mechatronic Design of IEDD-Unmanned Wheeled Mobile Manipulator. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference, Morelos, Mexico.10.1109/CERMA.2010.107 ↗
29. Experimental Study of the Methodology for the modeling and Simulation of Mobile Manipulators10.5772/51867 ↗
30. Soft Robotics: Review of Fluid-Driven Intrinsically Soft Devices; Manufacturing, Sensing, Control, and Applications in Human-Robot Interaction10.1002/adem.201700016 ↗
31. A Magnetic Resonance Compatible Soft Wearable Robotic Glove for Hand Rehabilitation and Brain Imaging10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2602941 ↗
32. Polygerinos, P., Galloway, K.C., Siddharth, S., Maxwell, H., and Walsh, C.J. (2015, January 11–14). EMG controlled soft robotic glove for assistance during activities of daily living. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Singapore.10.1109/ICORR.2015.7281175 ↗
33. Diseño de Exoesqueleto con base en Cuatro Casos de Estudio de Rehabilitaciõn de Miembro Superior
34. Hofer, M., and D’Andrea, R. (2018, January 1–5). Design, Modeling and Control of a Soft Robotic Arm. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Madrid, Spain.10.1109/IROS.2018.8594221 ↗
35. Gil-Agudo, A., Del Alma, A.J., Reyes-Guzman, A., Bernal-Sahun, A., and Roco, E. (2011). Applications of Upper Limb Biomechanical Models in Spinal Cord Injury Patients. Biomechanics in Applications, IntechOpen.10.5772/19920 ↗
36. Soft Poly-Limbs: Toward a New Paradigm of Mobile Manipulation for Daily Living Tasks10.1089/soro.2018.0065 ↗
37. The design and mathematical modeling of novel extensor bending pneumatic artificial muscles (EBPAMs) for soft exoskeletons10.1016/j.robot.2017.10.010 ↗
38. 3D printing for soft robotics–a review10.1080/14686996.2018.1431862 ↗
39. Soft-Material Robotics10.1561/2300000055 ↗
40. ASR glove: A wearable glove for hand assistance and rehabilitation using shape memory alloys10.1177/1045389X17742729 ↗
41. High-force soft printable pneumatics for soft robotic applications10.1089/soro.2016.0030 ↗
42. Soft Robots Manufacturing: A Review10.3389/frobt.2018.00084 ↗
43. Hydraulic Autonomous Soft Robotic Fish for 3D Swimming10.1007/978-3-319-23778-7_27 ↗
44. Thalman, C.M., Lam, Q.P., Nguyen, P.H., Sridar, S., and Panagiotis, P. (2018, January 1–5). A Novel Soft Elbow Exosuit to Supplement Bicep Lifting Capacity. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Madrid, Spain.10.1109/IROS.2018.8594403 ↗
45. In search of technology readiness level (TRL) 1010.1016/j.ast.2015.07.007 ↗
46. Teasell, R., and Viana, R. (2014). Evidence-based benefit of rehabilitation after stroke. Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511995590.049 ↗
47. Current Perspective on Assessment of Human Body Proportions of Relevance to Amputees10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00050-X ↗