journal article·2019-10-18Open access

New Security Improvements in Next-Generation Passive Optical Networks Stage 2 †

Vlastimil Clupek, Tomas Horvath, Petr Munster, Vaclav Oujezsky

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 20

Abstract

Passive optical networks are currently the most promising solution for access networks. These networks rely on broadcast signal distribution in the downstream direction and unicast signal transmission in the upstream direction. The upstream direction is controlled by optical line termination (OLT). The broadcast transmission method increases security vulnerability because the attacker is able to connect his/her modified optical network unit (ONU) to the free port of the splitter (commonly in the basement). We present the concept for the activation process of ONUs based on physical unclonable function (PUF) for next-generation passive optical networks stage 2 (NG-PON2). The use of PUF increases security in the NG-PON2. Furthermore, the registration identifier (ID) is not stored in a nonvolatile memory, in comparison with the common solution defined by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) recommendation G.989.3. An attacker cannot perform a reverse engineering attack to obtain the registration ID. For this reason, the attacker cannot clone an ONU. We proposed security improvements that involve authentication, encryption, integrity protection, and data origin verification methods in the NG-PON2. Our model uses the standard implementation of the transmission convergence layer of NG-PON2 with the new physical layer operations, administration, and maintenance (PLOAM) messages. The recommendation G.989.3 allows specifying own PLOAM messages since not all IDs are used in the current specification.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Telecommunication, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic

IT4Innovations, VSB–Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 15/2175, 708 33 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic

Department of Optical Networks, CESNET a.l.e., Zikova 4, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic

Funding

Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic · E-infrastructure CESNET – modernization · National Sustainability Program · Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports from the Large Infrastructures for Research, Experimental Development

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. (2019, May 05). Full Service Access Network. Available online: https://www.fsan.org/.
2. Horvath, T., Munster, P., and Vojtech, J. (2019). Deployment of PON in Europe and Deep Data Analysis of GPON. Telecommunication Systems [Working Title], InTech.10.5772/intechopen.82679 ↗
3. Weissberger, A. (2019, April 30). Combined FTTH and DSL Spending Set to Slow until 10 Gbps PON and G.fast Deployments. Available online: http://techblog.comsoc.org/tag/market-forecast/.
4. Meeting the Traffic Requirements of Residential Users in the Next Decade with Current FTTH Standards: How Much? How Long?10.1109/MCOM.2018.1800173 ↗
5. Is faster better? Quantifying the relationship between broadband speed and economic growth10.1016/j.telpol.2018.05.006 ↗
6. (2019, April 30). G.989.2: 40-Gigabit-Capable Passive Optical Networks 2 (NG-PON2): Physical Media Dependent (PMD) Layer Specification. Available online: https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.989.3.
7. (2019, April 08). G.989.3: 40-Gigabit-Capable Passive Optical Networks (NG-PON2): Transmission Convergence Layer Specification. Available online: https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.989.3.
8. (2010). ISO/IEC 13888-2:2010—Information Technology—Security Techniques—Non-Repudiation—Part 2: Mechanisms Using Symmetric Techniques, International Organization for Standardization. [2nd ed.].
9. Physical Unclonable Functions and Applications: A Tutorial10.1109/JPROC.2014.2320516 ↗
10. Physical One-Way Functions10.1126/science.1074376 ↗
11. Physical Unclonable Function based on a Multi-Mode Optical Waveguide10.1038/s41598-018-28008-6 ↗
12. Silicon photonic physical unclonable function10.1364/OE.25.012710 ↗
13. Initial tamper tests of novel tamper-indicating optical physical unclonable functions10.1364/AO.56.002863 ↗
14. MRAM PUF: A Novel Geometry Based Magnetic PUF With Integrated CMOS10.1109/TNANO.2015.2397951 ↗
15. Tehranipoor, F., Karimina, N., Xiao, K., and Chandy, J. (2015, January 20–22). DRAM based Intrinsic Physical Unclonable Functions for System Level Security. Proceedings of the 25th Edition on Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI—GLSVLSI ’15, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.10.1145/2742060.2742069 ↗
16. DRAM-Based Intrinsic Physically Unclonable Functions for System-Level Security and Authentication10.1109/TVLSI.2016.2606658 ↗
17. Memristive crypto primitive for building highly secure physical unclonable functions
18. Dodis, Y., Reyzin, L., and Smith, A. (2004). Fuzzy Extractors: How to Generate Strong Keys from Biometrics and Other Noisy Data. Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2004, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3_31 ↗
19. Fuzzy Extractors: How to Generate Strong Keys from Biometrics and Other Noisy Data10.1137/060651380 ↗
20. Secure and robust error correction for physical unclonable functions10.1109/MDT.2010.25 ↗
21. Hiller, M., Merli, D., Stumpf, F., and Sigl, G. (2012, January 3–4). Complementary IBS: Application specific error correction for PUFs. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/HST.2012.6224310 ↗
22. Muelich, S., Puchinger, S., Bossert, M., Hiller, M., and Sigl, G. (2014, January 7–13). Error Correction for Physical Unclonable Functions Using Generalized Concatenated Codes. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Workshop on Algebraic and Combinatorial Coding Theory ACCT2014, Svetlogorsk, Russia.
23. Puchinger, S., Mueelich, S., Bossert, M., Hiller, M., and Sigl, G. (2015, January 2–5). On Error Correction for Physical Unclonable Functions. Proceedings of the 10th International ITG Conference on Systems, Communications and Coding (SCC 2015), Hamburg, Germany.
24. Mueelich, S., and Bossert, M. (2017, January 6–9). A New Error Correction Scheme for Physical Unclonable Functions. Proceedings of the 11th International ITG Conference on Systems, Communications and Coding (SCC 2017), Hamburg, Germany.
25. Horvath, T., Malina, L., and Munster, P. (2015, January 6–7). On security in gigabit passive optical networks. Proceedings of the 2015 International Workshop on Fiber Optics in Access Network (FOAN), Brno, Czech Republic.10.1109/FOAN.2015.7320479 ↗
26. Malina, L., Munster, P., Hajný, J., and Horvath, T. (2015, January 20–22). Towards Secure Gigabit Passive Optical Networks. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT 2015), Colmar, France.
27. Security solution with signal propagation measurement for Gigabit Passive Optical Networks10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.04.069 ↗
28. Song, J.H., Poovendran, R., Lee, J., and Iwata, T. (2019, April 08). RFC4493—The AES-CMAC Algorithm. Available online: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4493.
29. Lipmaa, H., Wagner, D., and Rogaway, P. (2019, April 08). Comments to NIST Concerning AES Modes of Operation: CTR-Mode Encryption. Available online: https://bit.ly/2OTohab.
30. Daemen, J., and Rijmen, V. (2002). The Design of Rijndael: AES—The Advanced Encryption Standard, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-04722-4_1 ↗
31. Apostol, K. (2012). Brute-Force Attack, SaluPress.
32. Suh, G.E., and Devadas, S. (2007, January 4–8). Physical Unclonable Functions for Device Authentication and Secret Key Generation. Proceedings of the 2007 44th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/DAC.2007.375043 ↗
33. Maes, R. (2013). Physically Unclonable Functions: Constructions, Properties and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-41395-7 ↗
34. Bohm, C., and Hofer, M. (2013). Physical Unclonable Functions in Theory and Practice, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-5040-5 ↗
35. Maes, R., and Verbauwhede, I. (2010). Physically Unclonable Functions: A Study on the State of the Art and Future Research Directions. Towards Hardware-Intrinsic Security, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-14452-3_1 ↗
36. Horvath, T., Clupek, V., Munster, P., and Oujezsky, V. (2019, January 1–3). Key Exchange with PUF in NG-PON2 Networks. Proceedings of the 2019 42nd International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/TSP.2019.8769082 ↗
37. Dworkin, M. (2019, May 01). Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) and GMAC. Available online: https://bit.ly/2XWVuVo.10.6028/NIST.SP.800-38Gr1-draft ↗
38. Dworkin, M. (2019, May 01). Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: The CCM Mode for Authentication and Confidentiality, Available online: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-38c/final.
39. Bellare, M., Rogaway, P., and Wagner, D. (2004). The EAX Mode of Operation. Fast Software Encryption, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-25937-4_25 ↗
40. The offset codebook (OCB) block cipher mode of operation for authenticated encryption10.1080/01611194.2017.1422048 ↗
41. Dworkin, M. (2019, April 10). NIST Special Publication 800-38B: Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: The CMAC Mode for Authentication, Available online: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-38b.pdf.
42. Xi, X., Zhuang, H., Sun, N., and Orshansky, M. (2017, January 5–8). Strong subthreshold current array PUF with 265 challenge–response pairs resilient to machine learning attacks in 130nm CMOS. Proceedings of the 2017 Symposium on VLSI Circuits, Kyoto, Japan.10.23919/VLSIC.2017.8008503 ↗