An Integrated Object Tracking and Covert Visual MIMO Communication Service for Museum Security System Using Single Vision Sensor
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper explores the spatial coverage potential of a vision sensor to implement a dual service for a museum security system. Services include object monitoring and invisible visual Multiple-Input and Multiple-Output (MIMO) communication. For object monitoring, the Kalman filter algorithm is used. To implement a secret visual MIMO communication, an Adaptive Row-Column (ARC)-based LSB substitution technique is used along with the Integer Wavelet Transform method. These proposed services are implemented using existing electronic visual displays and surveillance cameras. Experiments are carried out using a sample object and four stego images. The performance of the object tracking system is measured in terms of accuracy by comparing the actual and estimated position of an object. Similarly, the performance of the covert visual MIMO system is measured at two different stages. On the transmitter side, differences between the cover and stego-images are used to measure imperceptibility. Likewise, at the receiver, differences between the original and the reconstructed data images are used to measure the accuracy. Results illustrate that the proposed system has improved imperceptibility, accuracy, and robustness, as compared to existing techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods · Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques · Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, India
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. The Integration of Interactive Display Method and Heritage Exhibition at Museum10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.064 ↗
2. Tsiropoulou, E.E., Thanou, A., Paruchuri, S.T., and Papavassiliou, S. (2016, January 20–21). Modelling Museum Visitors’ Quality of Experience. Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media adaptation and Personalization (SMAP), Thessaloniki, Greece.10.1109/SMAP.2016.7753388 ↗
3. Tsiropoulou, E.E., Thanou, A., and Papavassiliou, S. (2017, January 7–9). Self-organizing museum visitor communities: A participatory action research based approach. Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP), Bratislava, Slovakia.10.1109/SMAP.2017.8022677 ↗
4. Lykourentzou, L., Claude, X., Naudet, Y., Tobias, E., Antoniou, A., Lepouras, G., and Vasilakis, C. (2013, January 16–17). Improving museum visitors’ Quality of Experience through intelligent recommendations: A visiting style-based approach. Proceedings of the Workshop of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, Athens, Greece.
5. Tsiropoulou, E.E., Thanou, A., and Papavassiliou, S. (2017). Quality of experience-based museum touring: A human in the loop approach. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., 7.10.1007/s13278-017-0453-2 ↗
6. An intelligent surveillance platform for large metropolitan areas with dense sensor deployment10.3390/s130607414 ↗
7. Sookhanaphibarn, K., and Thawonmas, R. (2009). A Movement Data Analysis and Synthesis Tool for Museum Visitors’ Behaviors. PCM 2009: Advances in Multimedia Information Processing, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-10467-1_12 ↗
8. Lin, S., and Chou, S. (2017). Museum Visitor Routing Problem with the Balancing of Concurrent Visitors. Complex Systems Concurrent Engineering, Springer.
9. Survey on optical camera communications: Challenges and opportunities10.1049/iet-opt.2014.0151 ↗
10. Optical wireless communication systems10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.11.052 ↗
11. Ashok, A., Gruteser, M., Mandayam, N., Silva, J., Varga, M., and Dana, K. (2010, January 20–24). Challenge: Mobile Optical Networks through Visual MIMO. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1145/1859995.1860008 ↗
12. Ashok, A., Gruteser, M., Mandayam, N., Kwon, T., Yuan, W., Varga, M., and Dana, K. (2011, January 27–30). Rate Adaptation in Visual MIMO. Proceedings of the 2011 8th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/SAHCN.2011.5984946 ↗
13. Ashok, A., Gruteser, M., Mandayam, N., and Dana, K. (2011, January 23–25). Characterizing multiplexing and diversity in visual MIMO. Proceedings of the IEEE 2011 45th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), Baltimore, MD, USA.10.1109/CISS.2011.5766257 ↗
14. Yuan, W., Dana, K., Varga, M., Ashok, A., Gruteser, M., and Mandayam, N. (2011, January 20–25). Computer vision methods for visual MIMO optical system. Proceedings of the CVPR 2011 WORKSHOPS, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.10.1109/CVPRW.2011.5981735 ↗
15. Varga, M., Ashok, A., Gruteser, M., Mandayam, N., Yuan, W., and Dana, K. (July, January 28). Visual MIMO based led-camera communication applied to automobile safety. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, Bethesda, MD, USA.
16. Kim, J.E., Kim, J.W., and Kim, K.D. (2016). LEA detection and tracking method for color-independent visual-MIMO. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16071027 ↗
17. Manikanda, C., Neelamegam, P., and Wilfred, A.A. (2017, January 10–12). Visual-MIMO for vehicle to vehicle communications. Proceedings of the IEEE 2017th Microelectronic Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICMDCS), Vellore, India.10.1109/ICMDCS.2017.8211563 ↗
18. Simulation of MIMO channel characteristics for indoor visible light communication with LEDs10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.06.071 ↗
19. Yuan, W., Dana, K.J., Ashok, A., Gruteser, M., and Mandayam, N.B. (2013, January 3–5). Spatially varying radiometric calibration for camera-display messaging. Proceedings of the 2013th IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing, Austin, TX, USA.10.1109/GlobalSIP.2013.6737003 ↗
20. A novel visual SISO and MIMO computer Interface for process production system
21. Yuan, W., Dana, K., Ashok, A., Gruteser, M., and Mandayam, N. (2013, January 3–5). Dynamic and invisible messaging for visual MIMO. Proceedings of the IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing, Austin, TX, USA.10.1109/WACV.2012.6162992 ↗
22. Jambhekar, N., Dhawale, C., and Hegadi, R. (2014, January 14–16). Performance Analysis of Digital Image Steganographic Algorithm. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies, Rajasthan, India.10.1145/2677855.2677937 ↗
23. Performance and analysis of high capacity steganography of color images involving wavelet transform10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.08.208 ↗
24. An adaptive row-column least significant bit inlay approach for image steganography
25. Manikandan, C., Sai Siva Satwik, K., Rakesh Kumar, S., Neelamegam, P., and Venkatesh, S. (2018, January 8–9). Performance Analysis of Visual MIMO Communication System with Various Transform Domain Embedding Algorithms. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Sciences, Osaka, Japan.10.3390/app8101918 ↗
26. Liu, W., Zhang, Z., Li, S., and Tao, D. (2017). Road detection by using a generalized hough transform. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9060590 ↗
27. Jeong, J.M., Yoon, T.S., and Park, J.B. (2014, January 9–12). Kalman filter based multiple objects detection-tracking algorithm robust to occlusion. Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference (SICE), Sapporo, Japan.