Assessment of Failure Occurrence Rate for Concrete Machine Foundations Used in Gas and Oil Industry by Machine Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Concrete machine foundations are structures that transfer loads from machines in operation to the ground. The design of such foundations requires a careful analysis of the static and dynamic effects caused by machine exploitation. There are also other substantial differences between ordinary concrete foundations and machine foundations, of which the main one is that machine foundations are separated from the building structure. Appropriate quality and the preservation of operational parameters of machine foundations are essential, especially in the gas and oil industry, where every disruption in the technological process is costly. First and foremost, there are direct repair costs from damage to foundations, but there are also indirect costs associated with blockages of the production process. Foundation repairs can temporarily shut down a given part of the refining process from operation. Thanks to cooperation from our partner, we obtained data from 510 concrete machine foundations from a refinery. Our database included many parameters, such as concrete cover thickness, machine gravity center distortion, the angular frequency of vertical self-excited vibrations, the angular frequency of horizontal self-excited vibrations, amplitudes of oscillation, foundation area, foundation volume, and information on occurring failures. Concrete machine foundation failure is not yet fully understood. In our study, we assessed what affects the failure occurrence rate of concrete machine foundations and to what extent. We wanted to find out whether there are correlations between the foundation failure occurrence rate and the mentioned parameters. To achieve this goal, we utilized state-of-the-art machine learning techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Dam Engineering and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland
Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery Polish Academy of Sciences, Generala Jozefa Fiszera 14, 80-231 Gdansk, Poland
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Srinivasulu, P., and Vaidyanathan, C.V. (1977). Handbook of Machine Foundations, Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
2. Reynolds, C.E., Steedman, J.C., and Threlfall, A.J. (2007). Reinforced Concrete Designer’s Handbook, CRC Press.
3. Probability and sensitivity analysis of machine foundation and soil interaction
4. Council of Standards Australi (2009). Rotating Electrical Machines, Standards Australia. Part 1: Nominal data and parameters; PN-EN 60034-1:2009.
5. Sitharam, T.G. (2007). Advanced Foundation Engineering, Taylor & Francis.
6. Naik, L.D., Sajid, U.H., and Kiran, R. (2019). Texture-Based Metallurgical Phase Identification in Structural Steels: A Supervised Machine Learning Approach. Metals, 9.10.3390/met9050546 ↗
7. Rating Attributes Toolkit for the Residential Property Market10.3846/1648715X.2016.1270235 ↗
8. Procedure of Assessing Usefulness of the Land in the Process of Optimal Investment Location for Multi-family Housing Function10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.720 ↗
9. Ryu, S., Noh, J., and Kim, H. (2016, January 6–9). Deep neural network based demand side short term load forecasting. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communication, Sydney, Australia.
10. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Hall, M.A., and Pal, C.J. (2016). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Neal, R.M. (2007). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer.10.1198/tech.2007.s518 ↗
12. Artificial Neural Networks
13. Silva, I.N., Hernane Spatti, D., Andrade Flauzino, R., Liboni, L.H.B., and Reis Alves, S.F. (2017). Artificial Neural Networks, Springer.
14. Modeling of Strength of High-Performance Concrete Using Artificial Neural Networks10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00165-3 ↗
15. Prediction of concrete strength using artificial neural networks10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00004-X ↗
16. Prediction of Concrete Strength Using Neural-Expert System10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:3(462) ↗
17. A modified firefly algorithm-artificial neural network expert system for predicting compressive and tensile strength of high-performance concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.201 ↗
18. Compressive strength prediction of recycled concrete based on deep learning10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.169 ↗
19. Ziolkowski, P., and Niedostatkiewicz, M. (2019). Machine Learning Techniques in Concrete Mix Design. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12081256 ↗
20. Compressive strength prediction of environmentally friendly concrete using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.007 ↗
21. Vibration-based Damage Detection of Structures by Genetic Algorithm10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:3(222) ↗
22. Structural damage detection using neural network with learning rate improvement10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.02.029 ↗
23. An empirical comparison of machine learning techniques for dam behaviour modelling10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.05.001 ↗
24. Machine learning for durability and service-life assessment of reinforced concrete structures: Recent advances and future directions10.1016/j.autcon.2017.01.016 ↗
25. A novel study for the estimation of crack propagation in concrete using machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.227 ↗
26. A globally convergent BFGS method for pseudo-monotone variational inequality problems10.1080/10556788.2017.1332619 ↗
27. An adaptive scaled BFGS method for unconstrained optimization10.1007/s11075-017-0321-1 ↗
28. Battiti, R., and Masulli, F. (1990). BFGS optimization for faster and automated supervised learning. International Neural Network Conference, Springer.10.1007/978-94-009-0643-3_68 ↗
29. Berahas, A.S., Nocedal, J., and Takác, M. (2016). A multi-batch l-bfgs method for machine learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, The Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation.
30. Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm10.1109/72.329697 ↗
31. A modified BFGS method and its global convergence in nonconvex minimization10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00540-9 ↗
32. Grabowska, K., and Szczuko, P. (2015, January 23–25). Ship resistance prediction with Artificial Neural Networks. Proceedings of the Signal Processing: Algorithms, Architectures, Arrangements, and Applications (SPA), Poznan, Poland.10.1109/SPA.2015.7365154 ↗
33. Le, D., Huang, W., and Johnson, E. (2018). Neural network modeling of monthly salinity variations in oyster reef in Apalachicola Bay in response to freshwater inflow and winds. Neural Comput. Appl., 1–11.10.1007/s00521-018-3436-y ↗
34. Luenberger, D.G. (1973). Introduction to Linear and Nonlinear Programming, Addison-Wesley.
35. Flexural strength estimation of basalt fiber reinforced fly-ash added gypsum based composites
36. An improved seeded region growing algorithm10.1016/S0167-8655(97)00131-1 ↗
37. An efficient sequential learning algorithm for growing and pruning RBF (GAP-RBF) networks10.1109/TSMCB.2004.834428 ↗
38. Analysis of k-means and k-medoids algorithm for big data10.1016/j.procs.2016.02.095 ↗
39. Forecasting streamflow by combination of a genetic input selection algorithm and wavelet transforms using ANFIS models10.1080/02626667.2014.988155 ↗
40. An unsupervised feature selection algorithm based on ant colony optimization10.1016/j.engappai.2014.03.007 ↗
41. An efficient instance selection algorithm for k nearest neighbor regression10.1016/j.neucom.2017.04.018 ↗
42. An incremental design of radial basis function networks10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2295813 ↗
43. An introduction to ROC analysis10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 ↗
44. On the convergence rate of incremental aggregated gradient algorithms10.1137/15M1049695 ↗
45. Basic Principles of ROC Analysis10.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-2 ↗