Observation of the Velocity Variation of an Explosively-Driven Flat Flyer Depending on the Flyer Width
Source abstract
Abstract
Lim proposed a theoretical study on the velocity profile of an explosively-driven flat flyer affected by the rarefaction (or release wave) intrusion during the metal’s projection. This work shows somewhat reasonable agreement in a given range. However, this work is limited only in the early stage of detonation (~3 µs), and the larger scaled flyer projection (or extended time duration) behavior is needed for an engineering perspective. As continued work originating from this investigation, the velocity profile of explosively-driven flyers with different widths is studied based on multiple different approaches which include hydrocode simulation, the Gurney model, and Baum’s side loss correction (or effective charge mass approach), followed by a series of field experiments. In this study, the focus is on the observation of the flat flyer velocity (or terminal velocity) variation, depending on the width of the flyers which vary from 12, 25, 50, and 75 mm (or 100 mm). The terminal velocity profile variation, depending on the flyer width, is observed, and a general trend is identified.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Combustion and Detonation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Energetic Systems Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
Funding
Office of Naval Research
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Gurney, R.W. (1943). The Initial Velocities of Fragments from Bombs, Shells, and Grenades, Army Ballistic Research Lab. Army Ballistic Research Lab Report BRL 405, Report.10.21236/ADA289704 ↗
2. Henry, I.G. (1967). The Gurney Formula and Related Approximations for High Explosive Deployment of Fragments, Hughes Aircraft Co.. Report PUB-189.
3. Baum, F.A. (1978). Physics of an Explosion (English Translation from Federal Clearinghouse AD), Federal Clearinghouse.
4. Terminal velocity and rotation rate of a flyer plate propelled by a tube-confined explosive charge
5. Numerical simulation of explosively driven metal by material point method10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.031 ↗
6. Chanteret, P.Y. (November, January 30). Velocity of the driven metal plates with finite lateral dimensions. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Ballistics, San Antonio, TX, USA.
7. Acceleration profile of a flat flyer driven by detonation isentrope10.1002/prep.201200188 ↗
8. Taylor, G.I. (1941). Analysis of the Explosion of a Long Cylindrical Bomb Detonated at One End, Cambridge Univ. Press. Scientific Paper.
9. Matuska, D.A. (1984). HULL Users Manual, DTIC. AFATL-TR-84-59.10.21236/ADA145000 ↗
10. Dobratz, B.M., and Crawford, P.C. (2018, December 20). LLNL Explosives Handbook. Available online: http://bulletpicker.com/pdf/LLNL%20Explosives%20Handbook.pdf.
11. Lee, E.L., Horning, H.C., and Kury, J.W. (1968). Adiabatic Expansion of High Explosives Detonation Products, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California. TID 4500-UCRL 50422.10.2172/4783904 ↗