journal article·2018-09-21Open access

Live Load Distribution Factors for Skew Stringer Bridges with High-Performance-Steel Girders under Truck Loads

Iman Mohseni, Yong Kwon Cho, Junsuk Kang

Applied Sciences· Volume 8· Issue 10

Abstract

Because the methods used to compute the live load distribution for moment and shear force in modern highway bridges subjected to vehicle loading are generally constrained by their range of applicability, refined analysis methods are necessary when this range is exceeded or new materials are used. This study developed a simplified method to calculate the live load distribution factors for skewed composite slab-on-girder bridges with high-performance-steel (HPS) girders whose parameters exceed the range of applicability defined by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)’s Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) specifications. Bridge databases containing information on actual bridges and prototype bridges constructed from three different types of steel and structural parameters that exceeded the range of applicability were developed and the bridge modeling verified using results reported for field tests of actual bridges. The resulting simplified equations for the live load distribution factors of shear force and bending moment were based on a rigorous statistical analysis of the data. The proposed equations provided comparable results to those obtained using finite element analysis, giving bridge engineers greater flexibility when designing bridges with structural parameters that are outside the range of applicability defined by AASHTO in terms of span length, skewness, and bridge width.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA

Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

Interdisciplinary Program in Urban Design, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

Funding

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Effect of skewness on the distribution of live load reaction at piers of skewed continuous bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:1(110) ↗
2. Lateral live-load distribution of dual-lane vehicles with nonstandard axle configurations10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001014 ↗
3. Transverse load distribution of skew cast-in-place concrete multicell Box—Girder bridges subjected to traffic condition10.1590/S1679-78252013000200002 ↗
4. Influence of skew angle on continuous composite girder bridge10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000273 ↗
5. Girder moment in continuous skew composite bridge10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1996)1:1(37) ↗
6. Hamby, G., Clinton, G., Nimis, R., and Lwin, M.M. (2002). High Performance Steel Designers’ Guide.
7. Trends in design and construction of steel highway bridges in the United States10.1002/pse.56 ↗
8. Kim, S.H., Heo, W.H., You, D.W., and Choi, G.J. (2017). Vehicle loads for assessing the required load capacity considering the traffic environment. Appl. Sci.10.3390/app7040365 ↗
9. Kim, S.H., Choi, G.J., Heo, W.H., and You, D.W. (2016). Reliability evaluation of a PSC highway bridge based on resistance capacity degradation due to a corrosive environment. Appl. Sci., 6.10.3390/app6120423 ↗
10. AASHTO-LRFD live load distribution specifications
11. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1996). Standard Specifications for Design of Highway Bridges, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. [16th ed.].
12. Simplified method for calculating lateral distribution factors for live load shear
13. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2017). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. [8th ed.].
14. Zokaie, T., and Imbsen, R.A. (1993). Distribution of Wheel Loads on Highway Bridges, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (Nchrp) 12-26 Project Report, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
15. Wheel load distribution in I-girder highway bridges10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1285) ↗
16. Live load distribution factors in two-girder bridge systems using precast trapezoidal U-girders10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000520 ↗
17. Applicability of the simplified load distribution factor equation to PSC girder bridges10.1007/BF02829044 ↗
18. Huo, X.S., Conner, S.O., and Iqbal, R. (2003). Re-Examination of the Simplified Method (Henry’s Method) of Distribution Factors for Live Load Moment and Shear, Tennessee Department of Transportation. Project No. Tnspr-Res 1218.
19. Development of the applicability of simplified Henry’s method for skewed multicell box-girder bridges under traffic loading conditions10.1631/jzus.A1200098 ↗
20. Live-load moments for continuous skew bridges10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:9(2361) ↗
21. Menkulasi, F., Wollmann, C.L.R., and Cousins, T. (2016). Live-load distribution factors for composite bridges with precast inverted T-beams. J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 30.10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000901 ↗
22. Development of live load distribution factor equation for girder bridges
23. Live load distribution factor at the piers of skewed continuous multicell box girder bridges subjected to moving loads
24. Load distribution factors in simply supported skew bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:4(241) ↗
25. Effect of intermediate diaphragm on lateral load distribution factor of multicell box-girder bridges10.1007/s12205-014-0148-4 ↗
26. Computers and Structures, Inc (2018). CSIbridge, Version 20, Structural Software, Berkley.
27. Load distribution factors for composite multicell box girder bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1999)4:1(71) ↗
28. Ambient vibration testing and structural identification of a cable-stayed bridge10.1007/s11012-016-0430-2 ↗
29. Mohseni, I., Ahn, Y., and Kang, J. Development of improved frequency expressions for composite horizontally curved bridges with high-performance steel girders. Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2018.10.1007/s13369-018-3356-2 ↗
30. Linzell, D.G. (1999). Studies of a Full-Scale Horizontally Curved Steel I-Girder Bridge System Under Self-Weight. [Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology].
31. Newmark, N.W., Siess, C.P., and Penman, R.R. (1946). Studies of Slab and Beam Highway Bridges Part. I Tests of Simple-Span. Right I-Beam Bridges, The Engineering Experimental Station, The University of Illinois.
32. Wegmuller, A.W. (1976). Post elastic behavior of composite steel-concrete bridges. Second International Conference on Finite Element Methods in Engineering, University of Adelaide.
33. Zhang, Q. (December 2008). Development of Skew Correction Factors for Live Load Shear and Reaction Distribution in Highway Bridge Design. [Ph.D. Dissertation, Tennessee Technological University].
34. Kashif, R.M. (2017). Load Distribution Factors for Skewed Composite Steel I-Girder Bridges. [Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Windsor].
35. Erhan, S., and Dicleli, M. (2009). Live load distribution equations for integral bridge substructures. Eng. Struct., 1250–1264.10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.01.020 ↗