journal article·2013-04

A geometric model of decohesion in solid continua

A. T. Baldwin, M. M. Rashid

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 180· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

A modeling framework for material separation is proposed within the broad class of cohesive-type models. A key feature of the proposed framework is that the cohesive tractions are governed by a separate boundary-value problem defined on the separation surface, rather than by a traction-separation rule or other constitutive construct. The traction BVP incorporates a boundary condition intended to enforce continuity of the strain field at the separation front, thus rendering the material state bounded and continuous at the front. The phenomenology of material separation is governed by a rupture function, which can depend arbitrarily on the bulk material state. The rupture function, which is evaluated on the separation front, delineates the conditions for, and direction of, material separation. A linearly-elastic analytical solution using the new theory is provided to illustrate the functioning of the theory, including the regularizing effect of the cohesive traction.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Contact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Atkins A (1999) Scaling laws for elastoplastic fracture. Int J Fract 95:51–6510.1023/A:1018683830486 ↗
2. Benthem J, Koiter W (1973) Asymptotic approximations to crack problems. In: Sih G (ed) Methods of analysis and solutions of crack problems. Noordhoff, London, pp 131–17810.1007/978-94-017-2260-5_3 ↗
3. Bishop J (2009) Simulating the pervasive fracture of materials and structures using randomly close packed voronoi tessellations. Comput Mech 44:455–47110.1007/s00466-009-0383-6 ↗
4. Bishop J, Strack O (2011) A statistical method for verifying mesh convergence in Monte Carlo simulations with application to fragmentation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 88:279–30610.1002/nme.3176 ↗
5. Camacho G, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modeling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33:2899–293810.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-3 ↗
6. Chang C, Ma C (2002) The mixed-mode fracture analysis of multiple embedded cracks in a semi-infinite plane by an analytical alternating method. J Press Vessel Tech 124:446–45610.1115/1.1493204 ↗
7. Chen C, Kolednik O, Heerens J, Fischer F (2005) Three-dimensional modeling of ductile crack growth: cohesive zone parameters and crack tip triaxiality. Eng Fract Mech 72:2072–209410.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.01.008 ↗
8. Cornec A, Scheider I, Schwalbe KH (2003) On the practical application of the cohesive model. Eng Fract Mech 70:1963–198710.1016/S0013-7944(03)00134-6 ↗
9. Costanzo F (1998) A continuum theory of cohesive zone models: deformation and constitutive equations. Int J Eng Sci 36:1763–179210.1016/S0020-7225(98)00025-1 ↗
10. Dugdale D (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100–10410.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
11. Elices M, Guinea G, Gomez J, Planas J (2002) The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations, and challenges. Eng Fract Mech 69:137–16310.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-2 ↗
12. Fagerström M, Larsson R (2008) A thermo-mechanical cohesive zone formulation for ductile fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 56:3037–305810.1016/j.jmps.2008.06.002 ↗
13. Foster C, Borja R, Regueiro R (2007) Embedded strong discontinuity finite elements for fractured geomaterials with variable friction. Int J Numer Methods Eng 72:549–58110.1002/nme.2020 ↗
14. Gurtin M (1979a) On the energy release rate in quasi-static elastic crack propagation. J Elast 9:187–19510.1007/BF00041325 ↗
15. Gurtin M (1979b) Thermodynamics and the cohesive zone in fracture. ZAMP 30:991–100310.1007/BF01590496 ↗
16. Gurtin M (1979c) Thermodynamics and the griffith criterion for brittle fracture. Int J Solids Struct 15:553–56010.1016/0020-7683(79)90082-9 ↗
17. Hohe J, Basser H, Gross D (1996) Analysis of ductile crack growth by means of a cohesive damage model. Int J Fract 81:99–11210.1007/BF00033176 ↗
18. Jirásek M (2000) Comparative study on finite elements with embedded discontinuities. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 188:307–33010.1016/S0045-7825(99)00154-1 ↗
19. Mosler J, Scheider I (2011) A thermodynamically and variationally consistent class of damage-type cohesive models. J Mech Phys Solids 59:1647–166810.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.012 ↗
20. Mota A, Jaroslaw K, Ortiz M (2008) Fracture and fragmentation of simplicial finite element meshes using graphs. Int J Numer Methods Eng 73:1547–157010.1002/nme.2135 ↗
21. Needleman A (1990a) An analysis of decohesion along an imperfect interface. Int J Fract 42:21–4010.1007/BF00018611 ↗
22. Needleman A (1990b) An analysis of tensile decohesion along an interface. J Mech Phys Solids 38:289–32410.1016/0022-5096(90)90001-K ↗
23. Noll W (1993) The geometry of contact, separation, and reformation of continuous bodies. Arch Ration Mech Anal 122:197–21210.1007/BF00380254 ↗
24. Oliver J, Huespe A (2004) Theoretical and computational issues in modelling material failure in strong discontinuity scenarios. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:2987–301410.1016/j.cma.2003.08.007 ↗
25. Oliver J, Huespe A, Pulido M, Samaniego E (2003) On the strong discontinuity approach in finite deformation settings. Int J Numer Methods Eng 56:1051–108210.1002/nme.607 ↗
26. Pandolfi A, Ortiz M (2002) An efficient adaptive procedure for three-dimensional fragmentation simulations. Eng Comput 18:148–15910.1007/s003660200013 ↗
27. Papoulia K, Sam C, Vavasis S (2003) Time continuity in cohesive finite element modeling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58:679–70110.1002/nme.778 ↗
28. Park K, Paulino G, Roesler J (2009) A unified potential-based cohesive model of mixed-mode fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 57:891–90810.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.003 ↗
29. Rashid M (1997) A new theory for free-surface formulation in solid continua. Int J Solids Struct 34:2303–232010.1016/S0020-7683(96)00168-0 ↗
30. Sam CH, Papoulia K, Vavasis S (2005) Obtainig initially rigid cohesive finite element models that are temporally convergent. Eng Fract Mech 72:2247–226710.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.12.008 ↗
31. Scheider I, Brocks W (2003) Simulation of cup-cone fracture using the cohesive model. Eng Fract Mech 70:1943–196110.1016/S0013-7944(03)00133-4 ↗
32. Settgast R, Rashid M (2009) Continuum coupled cohesive zone elements for analysis of fracture in solid bodies. Eng Fract Mech 76:1614–163510.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.02.024 ↗
33. Siegmund T, Brocks W (2000) A numerical study on the correlation between the work of separation and the dissipation rate in ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 67:139–15410.1016/S0013-7944(00)00054-0 ↗
34. Sokolnikoff I (1956) Mathematical theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York
35. Tijssens M, Sluys B, van der Giessen E (2000) Numerical simulation of quasi-brittle fracture using damaging cohesive surfaces. Euro J Mech A/Solids 19:761–77910.1016/S0997-7538(00)00190-X ↗
36. Tvergaard V (2001) Crack growth predictions by cohesive zone model for ductile fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 49:2191–220710.1016/S0022-5096(01)00030-8 ↗
37. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson J (1992) The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 40:1377–139710.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-3 ↗
38. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson J (1994) Effect of T-stress on mode I crack growth resistance in a ductile solid. Int J Solids Struct 31:823–83310.1016/0020-7683(94)90080-9 ↗
39. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson J (1996) Effect of strain-dependent cohesive zone model on predictions of crack growth resistance. Int J Solids Struct 33:3297–330810.1016/0020-7683(95)00261-8 ↗
40. van den Bosch M, Schreurs P, Geers M (2006) An improved description of the exponential Xu and Needleman cohesive zone law for mixed-mode decohesion. Eng Fract Mech 73:1220–123410.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.12.006 ↗
41. Wells G, Sluys L (2001) A new method for modelling cohesive cracks using finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:2667–268210.1002/nme.143 ↗
42. Wells G, Sluys L, de Borst R (2002) Simulating the propagation of displacement discontinuities in a regularized strain-softening medium. Int J Numer Methods Eng 53:1235–125610.1002/nme.375 ↗
43. Xu X, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42:1397–143410.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-5 ↗
44. Zhang C, Gross D (1995) A cohesive plastic/damage-zone model for ductile crack analysis. Nuclear Eng Des 158:319–33110.1016/0029-5493(95)01039-K ↗
45. Zhang Z, Paulino G, Celes W (2007) Extrinsic cohesive modelling of dynamic fracture and microbranching instability in brittle materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 72:893–92310.1002/nme.2030 ↗