Environmental Impact of Energy Systems Integrated with Electrochemical Accumulators and Powered by Renewable Energy Sources in a Life-Cycle Perspective
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study is to assess the environmental impact of storage systems integrated with energy plants powered by renewable sources. Stationary storage systems proved to be a valid solution for regulating networks, supporting frequency, and managing peaks in electricity supply and demand. Recently, their coupling with renewable energy sources has been considered a strategic means of exploiting their high potential since it permits them to overcome their intrinsic uncertainty. Therefore, the storage systems integration with distributed generation can improve the performance of the networks and decrease the costs associated with energy production. However, a question remains regarding the overall environmental sustainability of the final energy production. Focusing on electrochemical accumulators, the problems mainly concern the use of heavy metals and/or impacting chemical components of storage at the center of environmental hazard debates. In this paper, an environmental assessment from a life-cycle perspective of the hybrid energy systems powered by fossil and renewable sources located on two non-interconnected minor islands is presented. Existing configurations are compared with new ones obtained with the addition of batteries for the exploitation of renewable energy. The results show that, for batteries, the assembly phase, including raw material extraction, transport, and assembly, accounts for about 40% of the total, while the remaining part is related to end-of-life processes. The reuse and recycling of the materials have a positive effect on overall impacts. The results also show that the overall impact is strongly related to the actual energy mix of the place where batteries are installed, even if it is usually lower than that of the solution without the batteries. The importance of a proper definition of the functional unit in the analysis is also emphasized in this work.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Extraction and Separation Processes · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1, 35131 Padova, Italy
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Commission of the European Communities (2013). Green Paper: A 2030 Framework for Climate and Energy Policies, Publications Office of the European Union.
2. Commission of the European Communities (2011). A Roadmap for Moving to a Competitive Low Carbon Economy in 2050, European Commission.
3. Estimating CO2 emissions reduction from renewable energy use in Italy10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.022 ↗
4. Stoppato, A., and Benato, A. (2017). The Importance of Energy Storage. Energy Storage, World Scientific.10.1142/9789813208964_0001 ↗
5. Integrated Thermal Electricity Storage System: Energetic and cost performance10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111833 ↗
6. Design and Operation of a Cogeneration System with Energy Storage opportunity10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.036 ↗
7. Components design and daily operation optimization of a hybrid system with energy storages10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.097 ↗
8. IRENA (2017). Electricity Storage and Renewables: Costs and Markets to 2030, International Renewable Energy Agency.
9. EASE/EERA (2021, March 18). European Energy Storage Technology Development Roadmap towards 2030. Available online: https://eera-es.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/EASE-EERA-Storage-Technology-Development-Roadmap-2017-HR.pdf.
10. CO2 Footprint and Life-Cycle Costs of Electrochemical Energy Storage for Stationary Grid Applications10.1002/ente.201600622 ↗
11. Life Cycle Assessment of a Vanadium Redox Flow Battery10.1021/acs.est.8b02073 ↗
12. The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters—A review10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.039 ↗
13. Environmental impacts of electricity generation for Graciosa Island, Azores10.1016/j.est.2017.12.002 ↗
14. Life Cycle Assessment of repurposed electric vehicle batteries: An adapted method based on modelling energy flows10.1016/j.est.2018.07.008 ↗
15. Multi-dimensional life cycle assessment of decentralised energy storage systems10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.110 ↗
16. Environmental impacts of balancing offshore wind power with compressed air energy storage (CAES)10.1016/j.energy.2015.11.041 ↗
17. Development of net energy ratios and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of large-scale mechanical energy storage systems10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.183 ↗
18. (2006). International Organization for Standardization ISO 14040:2006—Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework 2006, ISO.
19. (2006). ISO International Organization for Standardization ISO 14044:2006 Environmental, ISO.
20. Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation10.1016/j.energy.2007.11.012 ↗
21. Stoppato, A., and Benato, A. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment of a Commercially Available Organic Rankine Cycle Unit Coupled with a Biomass Boiler. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13071835 ↗
22. Comparative study of heat pump system and biomass boiler system to a tertiary building using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.148 ↗
23. LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems—A review10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.004 ↗
24. (2021, March 18). Web Source. Available online: www.batteryuniversity.com.
25. (2021, March 18). Web Source. Available online: www.eniday.com.
26. Redox flow batteries for the storage of renewable energy: A review10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.001 ↗
27. Na-ion batteries, recent advances and present challenges to become low cost energy storage systems10.1039/c2ee02781j ↗
28. Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials10.1039/c1ee01782a ↗
29. Life cycle assessment of sodium-ion batteries10.1039/C6EE00640J ↗
30. Materials, System Designs and Modelling Approaches in Techno-Economic Assessment of All-Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries—A Review10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.058 ↗
31. Web Source (2021, March 18). GFE Metalle und Materialien GmbH. Vanadium Electrolyte Solution 1.6 M. 637. Available online: http://www.gfe.com/produktbereiche/vanadium-chemikalien/anwendungen/ 638 energiespeicher/.
32. Adolfsson, M., and Rashid, S. (2016). Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost of Heat Exchangers. A Case for Inter Terminals Sweden AB Located in Port of Gothenburg, Chalmers 688, University of Technology.
33. Schexnayder, S.M., Das, S., Dhingra, R., Overly, J.G., Tonn, B.E., Peretz, J.H., Waidley, G., and Davis, G.A. (2001). Environmental Evaluation of New Generation Vehicles and Vehicle Components.10.2172/814410 ↗
34. Life cycle inventories of electricity generation and power supply in version 3 of the ecoinvent database—Part II: Electricity markets10.1007/s11367-013-0665-2 ↗
35. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 ↗
36. Weiguang, L.V., Wang, Z., Cao, H., Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., and Sun, Z. (2013). Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Nanoscale Technology: Lithium-ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles.
37. (2021, March 18). Web Source. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Application of Life-Cycle Assessment to Nanoscale Technology: Lithium-ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles, Available online: https://archive.epa.gov/epa/sites/production/files/2014-01/documents/lithium_batteries_lca.pdf.
38. (2021, March 18). Web Source. Available online: www.vinyloop.com.
39. Sustainability-inspired cell design for a fully recyclable sodium ion battery
40. (2021, March 18). Web Source. Legambiente, CNR-IIA. ISOLE SOSTENIBILI: Osservatorio Sulle Isole Minori. Available online: https://www.isolesostenibili.it/.
41. (2021, March 18). Web Source. Ricerca Sistema Energetico. Sviluppo delle Fonti Energetiche Rinnovabili nelle Isole Minori non Interconnesse. Rapporto RSE 15000371. Available online: http://rse-web.it/documenti.page?RSE_manipulatePath=yes&RSE_originalURI=/documenti/documento/temi/316137&country=ita.
42. Farret, F.A., and Simões, M.G. (2005). Micropower system modeling with HOMER. Integration of Alternative Sources of Energy, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471755621 ↗
43. ReCiPe2016: A harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y ↗
44. Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P.M. (2013). 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.